World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 33 952 948 306 306 101 3007
Engineering and Technology 36 8837 8518 1497 1490 98 3481

Clarence Choi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Clarence Choi between 2012 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Clarence Choi published across 14 years, from 2012 to 2025, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2024. 29 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2024. 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 10 publications
2012 2025

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Clarence Choi: publications per year, 2012 to 2025
Year Publications
2012 1
2013 4
2014 1
2015 9
2016 8
2017 11
2018 17
2019 18
2020 9
2021 16
2022 14
2023 16
2024 19
2025 10
Total 153
Download as CSV

Clarence Choi publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clarence Choi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 98 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283 98
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Clarence Choi D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clarence Choi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311 36
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Clarence Choi is affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China and contributes extensively to fields spanning Environmental Science and Engineering. Their research frequently addresses topics related to landslides, sediment transport, granular flow, and fluid dynamics, as well as dam engineering and ecosystem fire effects.

The main fields of study where Choi's work is situated include:

  • Environmental Science (110 publications)
  • Engineering (90 publications)

They further specialize in several subfields, including:

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change

The primary research topics addressed by Choi encompass:

  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Dam Engineering and Safety
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis

Choi has published multiple articles in a selection of academic venues, with recurrent contributions to:

  • Computers and Geotechnics (10 publications)
  • Canadian Geotechnical Journal (8 publications)
  • Engineering Geology (7 publications)
  • Landslides (6 publications)
  • E3S Web of Conferences (6 publications)

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Choi are:

  • Improved Settling Velocity for Microplastic Fibers: A New Shape-Dependent Drag Model (2021), Environmental Science & Technology
  • Impact Dynamics of Boulder-Enriched Debris Flow on a Rigid Barrier (2021), Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Numerical investigation of the mechanism of granular flow impact on rigid control structures (2021), Acta Geotechnica
  • Effect of slit size on the impact load against debris-flow mitigation dams (2020), Engineering Geology
  • Effects of barrier deformability on load reduction and energy dissipation of granular flow impact (2020), Computers and Geotechnics

Clarence Choi frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Charles Wang Wai Ng (15 coauthored works)
  • Haiming Liu (11 coauthored works)
  • W. A. R. K. De Silva (7 coauthored works)
  • Sunil Poudyal (6 coauthored works)
  • Charles W.W. Ng (5 coauthored works)

Best Publications

  • Influence of debris flow solid fraction on rigid barrier impact

    Dongri Song;C.W.W. Ng;Clarence Choi;Gordon G.D. Zhou

  • The cost of rapid and haphazard urbanization: lessons learned from the Freetown landslide disaster

    Yifei Cui;Deqiang Cheng;Clarence Edward Choi;Wen Jin

  • Impact mechanisms of granular and viscous flows on rigid and flexible barriers

    C.W.W. Ng;Dongri Song;Clarence Choi;L. H. D. Liu

  • Flume investigation of landslide granular debris and water runup mechanisms

    C. E. Choi;S. C. H. Au-Yeung;C. W. W. Ng;D. Song

  • Experimental investigation on the longitudinal evolution of landslide dam breaching and outburst floods

    Gordon G.D. Zhou;Mingjun Zhou;Mandira Singh Shrestha;Dongri Song

  • Physical Modeling of Baffles Influence on Landslide Debris Mobility

    Charles Wang Wai Ng;Clarence Choi;Dongri Song;J.H.S. Kwan

  • Effects of Particle Size of Mono-disperse Granular Flows Impacting A Rigid Barrier

    Yifei Cui;Clarence Edward Choi;Luis H. D. Liu;Charles Wang Wai Ng

  • Computational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow

    Clarence Choi;Charles Wang Wai Ng;Raymond P.H. Law;Dongri Song

  • Froude characteristics of both dense granular and water flows in flume modelling

    C. E. Choi;C. W. W. Ng;S. C. H. Au-Yeung;G. R. Goodwin

  • Improved Settling Velocity for Microplastic Fibers: A New Shape-Dependent Drag Model

    Unknown

  • Geophysical flows impacting a flexible barrier: effects of solid-fluid interaction

    Dong Song;Dong Song;Clarence Edward Choi;Charles Wang Wai Ng;Gongdan Zhou

  • Dry granular flow interaction with dual-barrier systems

    C. W. W. Ng;C. E. Choi;R. C. H. Koo;G. R. Goodwin

  • Numerical study of granular debris flow run-up against slit dams by discrete element method

    Gordon G. D. Zhou;Junhan Du;Dongri Song;Clarence E. Choi

  • Depositional mechanisms and morphology of debris flow: physical modelling

    Gordon G. D. Zhou;Shuai Li;Dongri Song;Clarence E. Choi

  • Impact Dynamics of Boulder-Enriched Debris Flow on a Rigid Barrier

    Charles Wang Wai Ng;Haiming Liu;Clarence Edward Choi;Julian S. H. Kwan

  • Quantitative analysis of debris-flow flexible barrier capacity from momentum and energy perspectives

    Dongri Song;Gongdan G.D. Zhou;Min Xu;Clarence Edward Choi

  • Discrete-element investigation of influence of granular debris flow baffles on rigid barrier impact

    Raymond Pak Hei Law;Clarence Edward Choi;Charles Wang Wai Ng

  • Velocity attenuation of debris flows and a new momentum-based load model for rigid barriers

    R. C. H. Koo;J. S. H. Kwan;C. W. W. Ng;C. Lam

  • Numerical investigation of the mechanism of granular flow impact on rigid control structures

    Edward Yang;Ha H. Bui;Giang D. Nguyen;Clarence E. Choi

  • Coarse Granular Flow Interaction with Slit Structures

    C. E. Choi;G. R. Goodwin;C. W. W. Ng;D. K. H. Cheung

  • Influence of particle size on the mechanism of dry granular run-up on a rigid barrier

    C. W. W. Ng;C. E. Choi;L. H. D. Liu;Y. Wang

  • Large-Scale Successive Boulder Impacts on a Rigid Barrier Shielded by Gabions

    Charles Wang Wai Ng;Clarence Choi;A.Y. Su;Julian S.H. Kwan

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Wang Wai Ng
Charles Wang Wai Ng Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Abdelmalek Bouazza
Abdelmalek Bouazza Monash University
Alessandro Pasuto
Alessandro Pasuto National Research Council (CNR)
Kostas Senetakis
Kostas Senetakis City University of Hong Kong
Ha H. Bui
Ha H. Bui Monash University
Hao Wang
Hao Wang Tianjin University
Matthew Richard Coop
Matthew Richard Coop University College London
Jeffrey S. Kargel
Jeffrey S. Kargel Planetary Science Institute
Li Min Zhang
Li Min Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Giang D. Nguyen
Giang D. Nguyen University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and Technology graduates often consider a range of further online degrees to enhance their skills and expand their career options. Many choose programs that complement technical expertise, such as the online MBA AACSB, which focuses on business management skills highly valued in tech-driven industries.

Another popular pathway is law and compliance. For those interested in the legal aspects of technology, such as intellectual property or technology contracts, ABA approved paralegal programs online provide foundational legal knowledge that can open up new roles.

Human resources and communications also play key roles in tech organizations. Graduates may opt for a masters in human resources to develop talents in people management, or an online masters in communications to master clear, effective communication—critical for team leadership and client relations.

Exploring these online degrees can help you diversify your skills and increase your value in both traditional engineering roles and interdisciplinary fields.

Best Scientists Citing Clarence Choi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles