World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 50 3398 3112 222 217 196 9530

Peng Cui publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peng Cui between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peng Cui published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2022. 55 of the 430 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2022. 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 65 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 44 publications 2025: 53 publications 2026: 2 publications
2003 2026

430 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peng Cui: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 4
2004 7
2005 3
2006 9
2007 9
2008 4
2009 12
2010 14
2011 13
2012 9
2013 16
2014 8
2015 16
2016 16
2017 18
2018 12
2019 17
2020 15
2021 16
2022 65
2023 48
2024 44
2025 53
2026 2
Total 430
Download as CSV

Peng Cui publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peng Cui sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 196 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401 196
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Peng Cui D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peng Cui sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183 50
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peng Cui is affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences in China and has a research focus spanning environmental science and engineering. Their work primarily addresses natural hazards, disaster risk, and environmental monitoring. They have contributed extensively to topics including landslides and related hazards, cryospheric studies and observations, flood risk assessment and management, climate change and permafrost, hydrology and watershed management studies, domain adaptation and few-shot learning, as well as geotechnical engineering and analysis.

The scientist's frequent publication venues include arXiv (Cornell University) with 29 publications, SSRN Electronic Journal (9 publications), Journal of Mountain Science (8 publications), Advances in Climate Change Research (7 publications), and Engineering Geology (6 publications).

Coauthors who have frequently collaborated with Peng Cui are Guotao Zhang, Nazir Ahmed Bazai, Qiang Zou, Yan Wang, and Jiao Wang.

Notable recent papers by Peng Cui include:

  • Scientific challenges in disaster risk reduction for the Sichuan-Tibet Railway, 2022, Engineering Geology
  • Scientific challenges of research on natural hazards and disaster risk, 2021, Geography and Sustainability

Additional highly cited works associated with the dataset include research on methanol oxidation, glacial lake outburst flood hazard, and battery catalyst materials, though these are authored by other researchers.

Peng Cui has also contributed to book publications, including one titled Integrated Disaster Risk Management: From Earth Sciences to Policy Making, published by Frontiers Media in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Recent Third Pole’s Rapid Warming Accompanies Cryospheric Melt and Water Cycle Intensification and Interactions between Monsoon and Environment: Multidisciplinary Approach with Observations, Modeling, and Analysis

    Tandong Yao;Yongkang Xue;Deliang Chen;Fahu Chen

  • The 12 May Wenchuan earthquake-induced landslide lakes: distribution and preliminary risk evaluation

    Peng Cui;Ying-yan Zhu;Yong-shun Han;Xiao-qing Chen

  • The Wenchuan Earthquake (May 12, 2008), Sichuan Province, China, and resulting geohazards

    Peng Cui;Xiao-Qing Chen;Ying-Yan Zhu;Feng-Huan Su

  • Experimental analysis on the impact force of viscous debris flow

    Peng Cui;Chao Zeng;Yu Lei

  • Scale amplification of natural debris flows caused by cascading landslide dam failures

    P. Cui;Gordon G.D. Zhou;X.H. Zhu;J.Q. Zhang

  • Comprehensive analyses of the initiation and entrainment processes of the 2000 Yigong catastrophic landslide in Tibet, China

    Jia-wen Zhou;Peng Cui;Ming-hui Hao

  • Increasing glacial lake outburst flood hazard in response to surge glaciers in the Karakoram

    Nazir Ahmed Bazai;Peng Cui;Paul A. Carling;Hao Wang

  • Dynamic process analysis for the initiation and movement of the Donghekou landslide-debris flow triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake

    Jia-wen Zhou;Jia-wen Zhou;Peng Cui;Xing-guo Yang

  • Changes in glacial lakes and glaciers of post-1986 in the Poiqu River basin, Nyalam, Xizang (Tibet)

    Xiao-qing Chen;Peng Cui;Yong Li;Zhong Yang

  • Intensity-duration threshold of rainfall-triggered debris flows in the Wenchuan Earthquake affected area, China

    Xiaojun Guo;Peng Cui;Yong Li;Li Ma

  • Destruction of vegetation due to geo-hazards and its environmental impacts in the Wenchuan earthquake areas

    Peng Cui;Yong-ming Lin;Can Chen

  • Engineering measures for debris flow hazard mitigation in the Wenchuan earthquake area

    Xiaoqing Chen;Peng Cui;Yong You;Jiangang Chen

  • Landslide Detection of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data Based on Deep Learning With Constrains

    Chengming Ye;Yao Li;Peng Cui;Li Liang

  • Jiangjia Ravine debris flows in south-western China

    Peng Cui;Xiaoqing Chen;Yuyi Waqng;Kaiheng Hu

  • Dynamic process analysis for the formation of Yangjiagou landslide-dammed lake triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake, China

    Jia-wen Zhou;Jia-wen Zhou;Peng Cui;Hua Fang

  • The mechanisms behind shallow failures in slopes comprised of landslide deposits

    Peng Cui;Chao-xu Guo;Jia-wen Zhou;Ming-hui Hao

  • Landslide-dammed lake at Tangjiashan, Sichuan province, China (triggered by the Wenchuan Earthquake, May 12, 2008): risk assessment, mitigation strategy, and lessons learned

    Peng Cui;Chao Dang;Jian-qi Zhuang;Yong You

  • Experimental study on cascading landslide dam failures by upstream flows

    Gordon G. D. Zhou;P. Cui;H. Y. Chen;X. H. Zhu

  • Characteristics and triggering mechanism of Xinmo landslide on 24 June 2017 in Sichuan, China

    Li-jun Su;Kai-heng Hu;Wei-feng Zhang;Jiao Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Yong Li
Yong Li Chinese Academy of Sciences
Hao Wang
Hao Wang Swinburne University of Technology
Alessandro Pasuto
Alessandro Pasuto National Research Council (CNR)
Jonathan Li
Jonathan Li University of Waterloo
Zhaoyin Wang
Zhaoyin Wang Tsinghua University
Emily Y. Y. Chan
Emily Y. Y. Chan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Rajib Shaw
Rajib Shaw Keio University
Paul A. Carling
Paul A. Carling University of Southampton
Peijun Shi
Peijun Shi Beijing Normal University
Tao Wang
Tao Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens the door to diverse career options, but many students also explore complementary fields through online programs. For those interested in creative and interdisciplinary skills, online MFA programs offer flexible paths to enhance knowledge in areas like environmental communication and digital media.

Students aiming to develop leadership and organizational skills alongside their Earth Science studies may benefit from pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online. This combination can prepare graduates for management roles within scientific organizations and environmental firms.

Earth Science appeals to learners of all ages, and many older adults find advantages in enrolling through degree programs tailored for them. The list of best degrees for older adults highlights flexible, accessible options ideal for lifelong learners looking to restart or advance their careers in geosciences or related fields.

Additionally, those interested in data, information management, and research can leverage expertise through ALA accredited MLS programs. These programs complement Earth Science by providing skills in managing scientific libraries and archives, crucial for research and education sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Peng Cui

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles