World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
24234
World Ranking
15650
National Ranking
7877

Rick W. Wright publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick W. Wright sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 306 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rick W. Wright D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick W. Wright sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rick W. Wright is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States and is primarily engaged in the field of Medicine with a focus on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Epidemiology, Rheumatology, and Biomedical Engineering. Their research portfolio includes work across several subfields emphasizing surgical techniques and outcomes, particularly involving knee and shoulder injuries.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

The scientist has contributed extensively to various peer-reviewed journals, frequently publishing in:

  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
  • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates?", 2020, The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Race- and Gender-Based Differences in Descriptions of Applicants in the Letters of Recommendation for Orthopaedic Surgery Residency", 2020, JBJS Open Access
  • "Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort", 2021, The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Meniscal Repair Outcomes at Greater Than 5 Years", 2022, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • "Descriptive Epidemiology From the Research in Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee (ROCK) Prospective Cohort", 2021, The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative research include Robert H. Brophy, Charles L. Cox, Matthew V. Smith, Eric C. McCarty, and Brian R. Wolf, reflecting ongoing partnerships in advancing clinical and epidemiological aspects of orthopaedic surgery and sports medicine.

Best Publications

  • Enhancement by N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide of water-soluble carbodiimide-mediated coupling reactions.

    James V. Staros;Rick W. Wright;Deborah M. Swingle

  • Surgery versus Physical Therapy for a Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis

    Jeffrey N. Katz;Robert H. Brophy;Christine E. Chaisson;Leigh de Chaves

  • How to write a systematic review

    Rick W Wright;Richard A Brand;Warren Dunn;Kurt P Spindler

  • Clinical practice. Anterior cruciate ligament tear.

    Kurt P. Spindler;Rick W. Wright

  • Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases

    Sharlene Teefey;S. Hasan;William Middleton;Mihir Patel

  • Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort.

    Rick W Wright;Laura J Huston;Kurt P Spindler

  • Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Failure From a MOON Prospective Longitudinal Cohort

    Christopher C. Kaeding;Brian Aros;Angela Pedroza;Eric Pifel

  • Return to Play and Future ACL Injury Risk After ACL Reconstruction in Soccer Athletes From the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Group

    Robert H. Brophy;Leah Schmitz;Rick W. Wright;Warren R. Dunn

  • Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review

    Rick W. Wright;Robert A. Magnussen;Warren R. Dunn;Kurt P. Spindler

  • Meniscal Repair Outcomes at Greater Than Five Years: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

    Jeffrey J. Nepple;Warren R. Dunn;Rick W. Wright

  • Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study

    John E Kuhn;Warren R Dunn;Rosemary Sanders;Qi An

  • Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

    L.M. Kruse;B. Gray;R.W. Wright

  • Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

    Rick W. Wright;Corey S. Gill;Ling Chen;Robert H. Brophy

  • Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review.

    John C. Clohisy;Amanda L. Schutz;Lauren St. John;Perry L. Schoenecker

  • Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.

    Matthew V Smith;Sandra E Klein;John C Clohisy;Geneva R Baca

  • Disorders of the long head of the biceps tendon.

    Navin Sethi;Rick Wright;Ken Yamaguchi

  • Risk of Tearing the Intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the Contralateral Knee and Rupturing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft During the First 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Prospective MOON Cohort Study

    Rick W. Wright;Warren R. Dunn;Annunziato Amendola;Jack T. Andrish

  • Effect of Graft Choice on the Outcome of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort

    Rick W. Wright;Laura J. Huston;Amanda K. Haas

  • Are Articular Cartilage Lesions and Meniscus Tears Predictive of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx Activity Level Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A 6-Year Multicenter Cohort Study

    Charles L. Cox;Laura J. Huston;Warren R. Dunn;Emily K. Reinke

  • The prognosis and predictors of sports function and activity at minimum 6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population cohort study.

    Kurt P. Spindler;Laura J. Huston;Rick W. Wright;Christopher C. Kaeding

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt P. Spindler
Kurt P. Spindler Cleveland Clinic
Robert G. Marx
Robert G. Marx Hospital for Special Surgery
Annunziato Amendola
Annunziato Amendola University of Iowa
Brian J. Cole
Brian J. Cole Rush University Medical Center
John C. Clohisy
John C. Clohisy Washington University in St. Louis
Bernard R. Bach
Bernard R. Bach Rush University Medical Center
Linda J. Sandell
Linda J. Sandell Washington University in St. Louis
Jeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Elena Losina
Elena Losina Brigham and Women's Hospital
Scot T. Martin
Scot T. Martin Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine doesn't always mean becoming a doctor. Several related online degrees and alternative pathways allow you to make a difference in healthcare, whether you prefer patient care, administration, or wellness.

For those interested in nursing careers but concerned about entry exams, several nursing schools that don't require teas offer flexible admissions, making it easier to enter the nursing profession.

If you see yourself leading teams or managing healthcare facilities, consider a health administration degree. This pathway opens doors to vital non-clinical roles and can often be completed online.

Registered nurses (RNs) seeking career advancement may benefit from an asn to np bridge program, helping you qualify for nurse practitioner roles through accelerated and flexible online study.

Lastly, if you’re passionate about food, wellness, and science, an online bachelor's in nutrition can lead to careers in dietetics, public health, or health education. Each pathway offers different opportunities to make a meaningful impact in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Rick W. Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles