World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
111
Citations
41140
World Ranking
861
National Ranking
519

Medicine

D-Index
114
Citations
43102
World Ranking
4782
National Ranking
2592

Elena Losina publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Losina sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 614 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elena Losina D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Losina sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Elena Losina is a researcher affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their work spans multiple topics within medicine, with a strong focus on surgery and rheumatology as leading subfields. Their research outputs predominantly address musculoskeletal conditions, specifically osteoarthritis and related treatment strategies.

Their recent publications include studies published in notable scientific journals:

  • The burden of OA-health services and economics, 2021, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
  • Clinical Impact, Costs, and Cost-effectiveness of Expanded Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Testing in Massachusetts, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Cost-effectiveness of public health strategies for COVID-19 epidemic control in South Africa: a microsimulation modelling study, 2020, The Lancet Global Health
  • College Campuses and COVID-19 Mitigation: Clinical and Economic Value, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Effect of Diet and Exercise on Knee Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis and Overweight or Obesity, 2022, JAMA

Their research has accumulated citations across these domains, indicating engagement with health economics, infectious diseases, and musculoskeletal pain management. The primary scientific fields include medicine, with a concentration in surgery (95 publications) and rheumatology (76 publications). Additional focus areas include pharmacology, infectious diseases, and epidemiology.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with them comprise:

  • Jeffrey N. Katz (64 joint publications)
  • Jamie E. Collins (49 joint publications)
  • David J. Hunter (24 joint publications)
  • Faith Selzer (22 joint publications)
  • Kenneth A. Freedberg (16 joint publications)

Their work appears regularly in key publication venues such as:

  • Arthritis Care & Research (26 publications)
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (24 publications)
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open (21 publications)
  • UNC Libraries (13 publications)
  • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (5 publications)

Main research topics covered by their publications include:

  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Overall, Elena Losina's scholarly output contributes to diverse aspects of musculoskeletal health and intersects with public health policy, economic evaluation, and infectious disease control, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to contemporary medical challenges.

Best Publications

  • Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population.

    Nizar N. Mahomed;Jane A. Barrett;Jeffrey N. Katz;Charlotte B. Phillips

  • Surgery versus Physical Therapy for a Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis

    Jeffrey N. Katz;Robert H. Brophy;Christine E. Chaisson;Leigh de Chaves

  • Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population

    Jeffrey N. Katz;Elena Losina;Jane Barrett;Charlotte B. Phillips

  • The Survival Benefits of AIDS Treatment in the United States

    Rochelle P. Walensky;Rochelle P. Walensky;A. David Paltiel;Elena Losina;Lauren M. Mercincavage

  • Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness.

    A. David Paltiel;Milton C. Weinstein;April D. Kimmel;George R. Seage

  • Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement.

    Charlotte B. Phillips;Jane A. Barrett;Elena Losina;Nizar N. Mahomed

  • Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume.

    Elena Losina;Rochelle P. Walensky;Courtenay L. Kessler;Parastu S. Emrani

  • The Cost Effectiveness of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Disease

    Kenneth A. Freedberg;Elena Losina;Milton C. Weinstein;A. David Paltiel

  • Number of Persons With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis in the US: Impact of Race and Ethnicity, Age, Sex, and Obesity.

    Bhushan R. Deshpande;Jeffrey N. Katz;Daniel H. Solomon;Edward H. Yelin

  • The lifetime cost of current human immunodeficiency virus care in the United States.

    Bruce R. Schackman;Kelly A. Gebo;Rochelle P. Walensky;Elena Losina

  • Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and the Outcomes of Total Knee Replacement

    Jeffrey N. Katz;Jane Barrett;Nizar N. Mahomed;John A. Baron

  • Estimating the Burden of Total Knee Replacement in the United States

    Alexander M. Weinstein;Benjamin N. Rome;William M. Reichmann;Jamie E. Collins

  • The Dramatic Increase in Total Knee Replacement Utilization Rates in the United States Cannot Be Fully Explained by Growth in Population Size and the Obesity Epidemic

    Elena Losina;Thomas S. Thornhill;Benjamin N. Rome;John Wright

  • Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population.

    Nizar N. Mahomed;Jane Barrett;Jeffrey N. Katz;John A. Baron

  • Lifetime risk and age at diagnosis of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the US.

    Elena Losina;Alexander M. Weinstein;William M. Reichmann;Sara A. Burbine

  • Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: A simulation study

    William M Reichmann;William M Reichmann;David Gagnon;David Gagnon;C Robert Horsburgh;Elena Losina;Elena Losina

  • Risk of Progression to Active Tuberculosis Following Reinfection With Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Jason R. Andrews;Farzad Noubary;Rochelle P. Walensky;Rodrigo Cerda

  • Review of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Related Opportunistic Infections in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Charles B. Holmes;Elena Losina;Rochelle P. Walensky;Yazdan Yazdanpanah

  • Lifetime Medical Costs of Knee Osteoarthritis Management in the United States: Impact of Extending Indications for Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Elena Losina;A. David Paltiel;Alexander M. Weinstein;Edward Yelin

  • Cost-effectiveness of Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States:

    Elena Losina;Rochelle P. Walensky;Courtenay L. Kessler;William M. Reichmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Kenneth A. Freedberg
Kenneth A. Freedberg Harvard University
Rochelle P. Walensky
Rochelle P. Walensky Harvard University
Milton C. Weinstein
Milton C. Weinstein Harvard University
David J. Hunter
David J. Hunter Harvard University
Daniel H. Solomon
Daniel H. Solomon Brigham and Women's Hospital
Sue J. Goldie
Sue J. Goldie Harvard University
Paul E. Sax
Paul E. Sax Brigham and Women's Hospital
George R. Seage
George R. Seage Harvard University
Ali Guermazi
Ali Guermazi Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Medicine in the USA is a major commitment, there are alternative online degrees and healthcare career paths that can complement or offer alternatives to traditional medical education. Many students choose to start their journey in healthcare with specialized online programs that can be completed in less time and often at a lower cost.

One popular choice is the average cost of medical billing and coding program, which provides a gateway into medical administration and is ideal for those interested in healthcare support roles. For those drawn to direct patient care but not ready to commit to medical school, there are the cheapest fnp programs and cheapest online nursing program. Both pathways offer flexible study options and strong job prospects across various healthcare settings.

For those already in nursing and seeking leadership or academic opportunities, pursuing the cheapest phd nursing programs can be a strategic next step. Exploring these online degree pathways enables career advancement and personal growth, all while managing costs and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Elena Losina

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles