World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
27670
World Ranking
11840
National Ranking
6070

Robert G. Marx publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert G. Marx sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 374 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert G. Marx D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert G. Marx sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert G. Marx is affiliated with the Hospital for Special Surgery in the United States. Their research primarily covers the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and Epidemiology. The focus of their work lies in clinical and surgical aspects related to musculoskeletal injuries and treatment outcomes.

The key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

They have published extensively in several academic journals, with recurring contributions in these venues:

  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
  • Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
  • Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Some recent representative papers authored or coauthored by them include:

  • "Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction," 2020, Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review
  • "Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates?", 2020, The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group," 2020, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Clinical Outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group," 2020, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
  • "Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort," 2021, The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Brian R. Wolf
  • Robert H. Brophy
  • Eric C. McCarty
  • Rick W. Wright
  • Keith M. Baumgarten

Best Publications

  • Erratum: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) (American Journal of Industrial Medicine (1996) 29:6 (602-608))

    P. L. Hudak;P. C. Amadio;C. Bombardier;D. Beaton

  • The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee : A prospective cohort study

    Kai Mithoefer;Riley J. Williams;Russell F. Warren;Hollis G. Potter

  • Surgery versus Physical Therapy for a Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis

    Jeffrey N. Katz;Robert H. Brophy;Christine E. Chaisson;Leigh de Chaves

  • Development and Evaluation of an Activity Rating Scale for Disorders of the Knee

    Robert G. Marx;Timothy J. Stump;Timothy J. Stump;Edward C. Jones;Thomas L. Wickiewicz

  • A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments

    Robert G Marx;Alia Menezes;Lois Horovitz;Edward C Jones

  • Clinimetric and psychometric strategies for development of a health measurement scale.

    Robert G. Marx;Claire Bombardier;Sheila Hogg-Johnson;James G. Wright

  • Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery.

    Stephen Lyman;Panagiotis Koulouvaris;Seth Sherman;Huong Do

  • Decision Making in the Multiligament-Injured Knee: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review

    Bruce A. Levy;Khaled A. Dajani;Daniel B. Whelan;James P. Stannard

  • Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Failure From a MOON Prospective Longitudinal Cohort

    Christopher C. Kaeding;Brian Aros;Angela Pedroza;Eric Pifel

  • Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients.

    Robert G. Marx;Edward C. Jones;Answorth A. Allen;David W. Altchek

  • Indications for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

    Luke S Oh;Brian R Wolf;Michael P Hall;Bruce A Levy

  • 20 Years of Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in New York State

    Emily R. Dodwell;Lauren E. LaMont;Daniel W. Green;Ting Jung Pan

  • Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

    Robert G Marx;Edward C Jones;Michael Angel;Thomas L Wickiewicz

  • Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study

    John E Kuhn;Warren R Dunn;Rosemary Sanders;Qi An

  • American Collegiate Men’s Ice Hockey An Analysis of Injuries

    Kyle Flik;Stephen Lyman;Robert G. Marx

  • High-Impact Athletics After Knee Articular Cartilage Repair A Prospective Evaluation of the Microfracture Technique

    Kai Mithoefer;Riley J. Williams;Russell F. Warren;Thomas L. Wickiewicz

  • Risk of Tearing the Intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the Contralateral Knee and Rupturing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft During the First 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Prospective MOON Cohort Study

    Rick W. Wright;Warren R. Dunn;Annunziato Amendola;Jack T. Andrish

  • Updating the assignment of levels of evidence.

    Robert G Marx;Sean M Wilson;Marc F Swiontkowski

  • Effect of Graft Choice on the Outcome of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort

    Rick W. Wright;Laura J. Huston;Amanda K. Haas

  • Local cytokine profiles in knee osteoarthritis: elevated synovial fluid interleukin-15 differentiates early from end-stage disease.

    C.R. Scanzello;E. Umoh;F. Pessler;C. Diaz-Torne

Frequent Co-Authors

Rick W. Wright
Rick W. Wright Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Kurt P. Spindler
Kurt P. Spindler Cleveland Clinic
Annunziato Amendola
Annunziato Amendola University of Iowa
Russell F. Warren
Russell F. Warren Hospital for Special Surgery
Brian J. Cole
Brian J. Cole Rush University Medical Center
Jeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Thomas L. Wickiewicz
Thomas L. Wickiewicz Hospital for Special Surgery
Hollis G. Potter
Hollis G. Potter Hospital for Special Surgery
James G. Wright
James G. Wright University of Toronto
Elena Losina
Elena Losina Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Medicine in the USA, it’s worth considering alternative and complementary career pathways in healthcare. Many roles are accessible with online degrees, offering flexibility and affordability compared to traditional programs.

For example, an him associate degree online can lead to a career in health information management, focusing on maintaining and securing patient records. Another popular route is taking a medical billing and coding online program, which prepares you to handle essential behind-the-scenes processes in healthcare administration.

Nursing is also one of the most in-demand professions. Those seeking advanced nursing roles can explore the cheapest online np programs to become a nurse practitioner, while entry-level programs such as affordable online nursing programs make it possible for new students to enter the nursing field.

These online degrees offer a range of career options and can be a practical first step or an excellent complement to further medical studies in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Robert G. Marx

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles