World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 109 942 899 574 543 451 40209
Medicine 109 5795 5441 3111 2884 447 42535

Lynn Snyder-Mackler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lynn Snyder-Mackler between 1966 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lynn Snyder-Mackler published across 61 years, from 1966 to 2026, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2010. 5 of the 463 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2010. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1966 2026

463 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lynn Snyder-Mackler: publications per year, 1966 to 2026
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 4
1990 2
1991 3
1992 0
1993 2
1994 3
1995 6
1996 5
1997 3
1998 7
1999 4
2000 8
2001 14
2002 11
2003 19
2004 11
2005 18
2006 8
2007 18
2008 12
2009 20
2010 29
2011 14
2012 19
2013 28
2014 21
2015 17
2016 11
2017 24
2018 22
2019 18
2020 21
2021 18
2022 12
2023 12
2024 8
2025 4
2026 1
Total 463
Download as CSV

Lynn Snyder-Mackler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn Snyder-Mackler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 447 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 447
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Lynn Snyder-Mackler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn Snyder-Mackler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 109
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Lynn Snyder-Mackler is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation.

Their work extensively addresses topics related to knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, sports injuries and prevention, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, shoulder injury and treatment, muscle activation and electromyography studies, tendon structure and treatment, and osteoarthritis treatment and mechanisms.

Among their recent scholarly publications are the following:

  • "ACL Reconstruction Rehabilitation: Clinical Data, Biologic Healing, and Criterion-Based Milestones to Inform a Return-to-Sport Guideline," 2021, Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach
  • "Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group," 2020, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Quadriceps Strength Symmetry Does Not Modify Gait Mechanics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Return-to-Sport Training," 2020, The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "Activity and functional readiness, not age, are the critical factors for second anterior cruciate ligament injury - the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study," 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "A Secondary Injury Prevention Program May Decrease Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Athletes: 2-Year Injury Rates in the ACL-SPORTS Randomized Controlled Trial," 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

Lynn Snyder-Mackler has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors including Thomas S. Buchanan, Karin Grävare Silbernagel, May Arna Risberg, Jacob J. Capin, and Elanna K. Arhos.

Their research appears regularly in established academic journals, with a significant number of publications appearing in:

  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
  • International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
  • Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Best Publications

  • OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis

    Raveendhara Bannuru;M. C. Osani;E. E. Vaysbrot;Nigel Arden;Nigel Arden

  • Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study

    Hege Grindem;Lynn Snyder-Mackler;Håvard Moksnes;Lars Engebretsen

  • OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis

    Fiona Dobson;Rana Hinman;Ewa Roos;Ewa Roos;J Abbott

  • Development of a Patient-Reported Measure of Function of the Knee*

    James J. Irrgang;Lynn Snyder-Mackler;Robert S. Wainner;Freddie H. Fu

  • Quadriceps Strength and the Time Course of Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Ryan L. Mizner;Stephanie C. Petterson;Lynn Snyder-Mackler

  • The effect of insufficient quadriceps strength on gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

    Michael Lewek;Katherine Rudolph;Michael Axe;Lynn Snyder-Mackler

  • Current Concepts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Criterion–Based Rehabilitation Progression

    Douglas Adams;David S Logerstedt;Airelle Hunter-Giordano;Michael J Axe

  • Strength of the Quadriceps Femoris Muscle and Functional Recovery after Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Electrical Stimulation *

    Lynn Snyder-Mackler;Anthony Delitto;Sherri L. Bailey;Susan W. Stralka

  • Eccentric Muscle Contractions: Their Contribution to Injury, Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Sport

    Paul C. LaStayo;John M. Woolf;Michael D. Lewek;Lynn Snyder-Mackler

  • Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation.

    Ryan L Mizner;Stephanie C Petterson;Jennifer E Stevens;Krista Vandenborne

  • Dynamic stability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.

    Katherine S. Rudolph;Michael J. Axe;Thomas S. Buchanan;John P. Scholz

  • Quadriceps strength and volitional activation before and after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis

    Jennifer E. Stevens;Ryan L. Mizner;Lynn Snyder-Mackler

  • Control of frontal plane knee laxity during gait in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis

    Michael D. Lewek;Katherine S. Rudolph;Lynn Snyder-Mackler

  • Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers.

    Marty E. Eastlack;Michael J. Axe;Lynn Snyder-Mackler

  • Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Weakness and Activation Failure in Patients with Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

    Michael D. Lewek;Katherine S. Rudolph;Lynn Snyder-Mackler

  • A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

    G K Fitzgerald;M J Axe;L Snyder-Mackler

  • Dynamic stability after ACL injury: who can hop?

    K.S. Rudolph;M.J. Axe;L. Snyder-Mackler

  • Dynamic knee stability: current theory and implications for clinicians and scientists

    Glenn N. Williams;Terese Chmielewski;Katherine S. Rudolph;Thomas S. Buchanan

  • The Efficacy of Perturbation Training in Nonoperative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation Programs for Physically Active Individuals

    G Kelley Fitzgerald;Michael J Axe;Lynn Snyder-Mackler

  • Fate of the ACL-injured patient: a prospective outcome study

    L Snyder-Mackler

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Engebretsen
Lars Engebretsen Oslo University Hospital
Kim L. Bennell
Kim L. Bennell University of Melbourne
Kurt P. Spindler
Kurt P. Spindler Cleveland Clinic
James J. Irrgang
James J. Irrgang University of Pittsburgh
Rana S. Hinman
Rana S. Hinman University of Melbourne
Ewa M. Roos
Ewa M. Roos University of Southern Denmark
Robert G. Marx
Robert G. Marx Hospital for Special Surgery
David J. Hunter
David J. Hunter Harvard University
Aileen M. Davis
Aileen M. Davis University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Medicine but seeking flexibility or alternative career options, there are several affordable online healthcare degrees worth considering. For example, health information management (HIM) programs can be an excellent fit for those drawn to data, technology, and administration in a healthcare setting. Choosing from him programs can help you build a specialized skillset for roles in medical records management and information security.

Many students also explore medical billing and coding online courses cost to determine if this career path provides a quick entry into healthcare. These programs teach the skills needed to process patient data and insurance claims, and they are often more affordable than traditional degrees.

For those who aspire to direct patient care but want a faster or cost-effective path, becoming a nurse practitioner through one of the cheap np programs can be a rewarding option. Similarly, understanding how much does online nursing school cost is crucial for those planning to pursue registered nursing online.

Best Scientists Citing Lynn Snyder-Mackler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles