World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
151
Citations
80452
World Ranking
1127
National Ranking
648

Freddie H. Fu publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freddie H. Fu sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,106 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Freddie H. Fu D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Freddie H. Fu sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 151 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1993 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Freddie H. Fu is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States, with a primary research focus in the field of Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Mechanics of Materials. The scientist's research topics predominantly cover knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, sports injuries and prevention, orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation, tendon structure and treatment, lower extremity biomechanics and pathologies, and shoulder injury and treatment.

The scientist has published extensively in several notable venues. Frequent publication outlets include Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. These journals reflect a consistent focus on orthopedics, sports medicine, and surgical innovation.

Freddie H. Fu's recent published papers demonstrate a particular interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, treatments, and rehabilitation outcomes. These papers include:

  • Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group, 2020, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
  • Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction With a BTB Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2020, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Treatment after ACL injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group, 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation, 2021, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
  • Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent coauthors, indicating ongoing research partnerships. These include Volker Musahl, Benjamin B. Rothrauff, Jón Karlsson, Theresa Diermeier, and James J. Irrgang. Their collaboration patterns suggest multidisciplinary and multi-institutional research efforts.

Freddie H. Fu was recognized as a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 1993, reflecting an acknowledgment within the academic and engineering communities.

Best Publications

  • The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries

    S.M. Lephart;D.M. Pincivero;J.L. Giraldo;F.H. Fu

  • Biomechanical Analysis of an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

    Masayoshi Yagi;Eric K. Wong;Akihiro Kanamori;Richard E. Debski

  • Meniscal tears: The effect of meniscectomy and of repair on intraarticular contact areas and stress in the human knee A preliminary report

    Mark E. Baratz;Freddie H. Fu;Richard Mengato

  • Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement

    John C Loh;Yukihisa Fukuda;Eiichi Tsuda;Richard J Steadman

  • Muscle injuries and repair: current trends in research.

    Johnny Huard;Yong Li;Freddie H. Fu

  • Development of a Patient-Reported Measure of Function of the Knee*

    James J. Irrgang;Lynn Snyder-Mackler;Robert S. Wainner;Freddie H. Fu

  • Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction.

    Fu Fh;Bennett Ch;Lattermann C;Ma Cb

  • In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads

    M. Sakane;R. J. Fox;S. L.-Y. Woo;G. A. Livesay

  • The Role of the Long Head of the Biceps Muscle and Superior Glenoid Labrum in Anterior Stability of the Shoulder

    Mark W. Rodosky;Christopher D. Harner;Freddie H. Fu

  • Knee joint laxity and neuromuscular characteristics of male and female soccer and basketball players.

    Susan L. Rozzi;Scott M. Lephart;William S. Gear;Freddie H. Fu

  • Recovery from mild concussion in high school athletes.

    Mark R. Lovell;Michael W. Collins;Grant L. Iverson;Melvin Field

  • The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon . A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads.

    Savio L-Y. Woo;Akihiro Kanamori;Jennifer Zeminski;Masayoshi Yagi

  • Gender differences in strength and lower extremity kinematics during landing

    Scott M. Lephart;Cheryl M. Ferris;Bryan L. Riemann;Joseph B. Myers

  • Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.

    Mario Ferretti;Max Ekdahl;Wei Shen;Freddie H. Fu

  • Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Part II. Operative Procedures and Clinical Correlations

    F H Fu;C H Bennett;C B Ma;Jacques Menetrey

  • The Role of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Anterior Tibial Translation and Internal Rotation

    Thore Zantop;Mirko Herbort;Michael J. Raschke;Freddie H. Fu

  • Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts

    John C. L'Insalata;Brian Klatt;Freddie H. Fu;Christopher D. Harner

  • Loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

    Christopher D. Harner;James J. Irrgang;Jonathan Paul;Steven Dearwater

  • Importance of the medial meniscus in the anterior cruciate ligament‐deficient knee

    Christina R. Allen;Eric K. Wong;Glen A. Livesay;Masataka Sakane

  • Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

    J. Höher;H. D. Möller;F. H. Fu

Frequent Co-Authors

James J. Irrgang
James J. Irrgang University of Pittsburgh
Johnny Huard
Johnny Huard The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Christopher D. Harner
Christopher D. Harner The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Savio L. C. Woo
Savio L. C. Woo Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jon Karlsson
Jon Karlsson University of Gothenburg
Scott M. Lephart
Scott M. Lephart University of Kentucky
Arvydas Usas
Arvydas Usas Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Paul D. Robbins
Paul D. Robbins University of Minnesota
Lyle J. Micheli
Lyle J. Micheli Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens diverse career pathways beyond traditional medical school routes. Many students pursue related online programs to expand their healthcare expertise or transition into specialized roles quickly and flexibly.

For example, those interested in mental health can consider shortest online pmhnp programs to become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners faster. This accelerated pathway enables working professionals to upskill while balancing job and personal commitments.

If you are interested in the business and administrative side of healthcare, fully online healthcare administration degrees and master's in healthcare administration online programs provide affordable and reputable options. These degrees equip graduates for leadership, management, and policy roles within hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

For nurses aiming to advance clinical practice, exploring the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs can lead to the highest level of nursing education with cost-effective, flexible online study. Online education in these fields continues to break down barriers, making healthcare careers more accessible and varied for students worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Freddie H. Fu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles