World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Angelo S. DeNisi

Angelo S. DeNisi

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6515 6063 3531 3203 108 20753

Angelo S. DeNisi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Angelo S. DeNisi between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Angelo S. DeNisi published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1996. 9 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1996. 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 1 publication
1974 2024

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Angelo S. DeNisi: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 2
1975 0
1976 2
1977 5
1978 1
1979 3
1980 5
1981 6
1982 3
1983 5
1984 4
1985 4
1986 4
1987 4
1988 4
1989 4
1990 2
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 7
1995 4
1996 9
1997 6
1998 5
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 5
2008 8
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 2
2014 5
2015 3
2016 5
2017 3
2018 2
2019 3
2020 3
2021 4
2022 6
2023 8
2024 1
Total 174
Download as CSV

Angelo S. DeNisi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo S. DeNisi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 108
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Angelo S. DeNisi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo S. DeNisi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Angelo S. DeNisi is affiliated with Tulane University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields within Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences, with substantial contributions to Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Gender Studies, Demography, and Communication.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics including Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Retirement, Disability, and Employment, International Student and Expatriate Challenges, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, AI and HR Technologies, and the Ethics and Social Impacts of AI.

Recent significant publications by Angelo S. DeNisi include:

  • "Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT" (2023) in Human Resource Management Journal
  • "Do Age Stereotypes Predict Personnel Decisions? The State of the Evidence" (2021) in Work Aging and Retirement
  • "Research on host-country nationals in multinational enterprises: The last five decades and ways forward" (2022) in Journal of World Business
  • "Performance management systems and multinational enterprises: Where we are and where we should go" (2021) in Human Resource Management
  • "The road to more sustainable firms in the face of a pandemic: Changes needed in employment relationships" (2021) in BRQ Business Research Quarterly

Frequent coauthors of Angelo S. DeNisi include:

  • Kevin R. Murphy
  • Pawan Budhwar
  • Arup Varma
  • Soumyadeb Chowdhury
  • Geoffrey Wood

Their research has appeared repeatedly in venues such as Work Aging and Retirement, Human Resource Management Journal, Journal of World Business, Human Resource Management, and BRQ Business Research Quarterly.

Throughout their career, Angelo S. DeNisi has been recognized with awards including Fellowship of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1989 and designation as Dean of Fellow by the Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.

    Avraham N. Kluger;Angelo DeNisi

  • Communication with Employees Following a Merger: A Longitudinal Field Experiment

    David M. Schweiger;Angelo S. Denisi

  • A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions

    Angelo S. DeNisi;Thomas P. Cafferty;Bruce M. Meglino

  • Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?

    Angelo S. DeNisi;Kevin R. Murphy

  • Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?

    Angelo S. DeNisi;Avraham N. Kluger

  • Performance Appraisal, Performance Management and Improving Individual Performance: A Motivational Framework

    Angelo S. DeNisi;Robert D. Pritchard

  • Cross-level effects of demography and diversity climate on organizational attachment and firm effectiveness

    Jorge A. Gonzalez;Angelo S. DeNisi

  • Feedback Interventions: Toward the Understanding of a Double-Edged Sword

    Avraham N. Kluger;Angelo DeNisi

  • A Cognitive Approach to Performance Appraisal

    Angelo DeNisi

  • Host country nationals as socializing agents: a social identity approach

    Soo Min Toh;Angelo S. DeNisi

  • Modeling new venture performance: An analysis of new venture strategy, industry structure, and venture origin☆

    Patricia P. McDougall;Richard B. Robinson;Angelo S. DeNisi

  • Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research

    Angelo S. DeNisi;Caitlin E. Smith

  • Investigation of the uses of self-reports of abilities.

    Angelo S. DeNisi;James B. Shaw

  • Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage : designing strategies for effective human resource management

    Susan E. Jackson;Michael A. Hitt;Angelo S. DeNisi

  • The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: The role of disability–job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards.

    Adrienne Colella;Angelo S. DeNisi;Arup Varma

  • INTERPERSONAL AFFECT AND PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL: A FIELD STUDY

    Arup Varma;Angelo S. Denisi;Lawrence H. Peters

  • A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance evaluations.

    Tina L. Robbins;Angelo S. DeNisi

  • Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.

    Unknown

  • The Impact of Work Environment, Instrumentality Beliefs, Perceived Labor Union Image, and Subjective Norms on Union Voting Intentions.

    Stuart A. Youngblood;Angelo S. DeNisi;Julie L. Molleston;William H. Mobley

  • EFFECTS OF PREVIOUS JOB EXPOSURE AND SUBSEQUENT JOB STATUS ON THE FUNCTIONING OF A REALISTIC JOB PREVIEW

    Bruce M. Meglino;Angelo S. Denisi;Elizabeth C. Ravlin

  • A Meta-Analytic Examination of Realistic Job Preview Effectiveness: A Test of Three Counterintuitive Propositions

    Bruce M Meglino;Elizabeth C Ravlin;Angelo S DeNisi

  • Effects of realistic job previews: A comparison using an enhancement and a reduction preview.

    Bruce M. Meglino;Angelo S. DeNisi;Stuart A. Youngblood;Kevin J. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Arup Varma
Arup Varma Loyola University Chicago
Peter W. Hom
Peter W. Hom Arizona State University
Chester A. Schriesheim
Chester A. Schriesheim University of Miami
Michael A. Hitt
Michael A. Hitt Texas A&M University
Brian L. Connelly
Brian L. Connelly Auburn University
Angelo J. Kinicki
Angelo J. Kinicki Arizona State University
Pawan Budhwar
Pawan Budhwar Aston University
Avraham N. Kluger
Avraham N. Kluger Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Rodger W. Griffeth
Rodger W. Griffeth Ohio University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and rewarding career pathways. Popular online options include bachelor’s and master’s degrees in psychology, counseling, and specialized areas like Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). These degrees often combine flexible coursework with field experience, preparing students for licensure and professional roles.

If you’re interested in becoming an MFT, it’s important to understand certification requirements which can vary by location. For example, Cleveland mft certification requirements focus on state-approved graduate programs and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, mft requirements in Colorado Springs highlight steps like coursework in ethics and counseling theories.

The process of how to become a marriage and family therapist in Columbus includes passing specific exams and completing supervised internships. In Texas, mft requirements in Corpus Christi require additional background checks and state licensing exams.

Exploring these pathways ensures you’re equipped to meet state standards and launch a successful career in mental health or family therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Angelo S. DeNisi

Trending Scientists