World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10027 9385 5283 4824 64 9244

James W. Smither publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James W. Smither between 1985 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James W. Smither published across 36 years, from 1985 to 2020, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1999. 3 of the 69 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1999. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications
1985 2020

69 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James W. Smither: publications per year, 1985 to 2020
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 4
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 2
1997 1
1998 4
1999 5
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 3
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 1
2014 2
2015 2
2016 3
2017 0
2018 1
2019 1
2020 2
Total 69
Download as CSV

James W. Smither publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Smither sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 64 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 64
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James W. Smither D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Smither sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James W. Smither is affiliated with La Salle University in the United States. Their academic profile primarily reflects association with this institution without additional noted affiliations or collaborations.

While there are no recent papers listed under their name, the absence of specified publications, coauthors, fields of study, and topics suggests a profile still centered on their institutional role rather than an extensive public research portfolio.

No information was provided regarding publications in books, editorial contributions, or scientific awards, indicating that such activities may not be documented or prominent in the available data.

This profile does not include detailed domain-specific research fields or subfields connected to James W. Smither, nor does it list main topics of work or frequent venues of publication.

Best Publications

  • DOES PERFORMANCE IMPROVE FOLLOWING MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK? A THEORETICAL MODEL, META-ANALYSIS, AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS

    James W. Smither;Manuel London;Richard R. Reilly

  • APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES

    James W. Smither;Richard R. Reilly;Roger E. Millsap;Kenneth Pearlman At T

  • CAN MULTI-SOURCE FEEDBACK CHANGE PERCEPTIONS OF GOAL ACCOMPLISHMENT, SELF-EVALUATIONS, AND PERFORMANCE-RELATED OUTCOMES? THEORY-BASED APPLICATIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH

    Manuel London;James W. Smither

  • Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process

    Manuel London;James W. Smither

  • CAN WORKING WITH AN EXECUTIVE COACH IMPROVE MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK RATINGS OVER TIME? A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL FIELD STUDY

    James W. Smither;Manuel London;Raymond Flautt;Yvette Vargas

  • Self–other rating agreement in leadership: A review.

    John W. Fleenor;James W. Smither;Leanne E. Atwater;Phillip W. Braddy

  • Empowered self‐development and continuous learning

    Manuel London;James W. Smither

  • A FIVE‐YEAR STUDY OF UPWARD FEEDBACK: WHAT MANAGERS DO WITH THEIR RESULTS MATTERS

    Alan G. Walker;James W. Smither

  • AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF AN UPWARD FEEDBACK PROGRAM OVER TIME

    James W. Smither;Manuel London;Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos;Richard R. Reilly

  • Accountability: The Achilles' Heel of Multisource Feedback

    Manuel London;James W. Smither;Dennis J. Adsit

  • A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF UPWARD FEEDBACK

    Richard R. Reilly;James W. Smither;Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos

  • Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others' ratings of leadership?

    Leanne Atwater;Mo Wang;James W. Smither;John W. Fleenor

  • The Effects of Religiosity on Ethical Judgments

    Alan G. Walker;James W. Smither;Jason DeBode

  • AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF USING BEHAVIOR CHECKLISTS ON THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS

    Richard R. Reilly;Sarah Henry;James W. Smither

  • Performance management: Putting research into action.

    James W. Smither;Manuel London

  • Performance appraisal : state of the art in practice

    James W. Smither

  • The Relationship Between Leaders’ Personality and Their Reactions to and Use of Multisource Feedback A Longitudinal Study

    James W. Smither;Manuel London;Kristin Roukema Richmond

  • Career-related continuous learning: Defining the construct and mapping the process.

    Manuel London;James W. Smither

  • Can Psychotherapy Research Serve as a Guide for Research About Executive Coaching? An Agenda for the Next Decade

    James W. Smither

  • Effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: Contrast versus assimilation revisited.

    James W. Smither;Richard R. Reilly;Richard Buda

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard R. Reilly
Richard R. Reilly Stevens Institute of Technology
Manuel London
Manuel London Stony Brook University
Leanne E. Atwater
Leanne E. Atwater University of Houston
Roger E. Millsap
Roger E. Millsap Arizona State University
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
John Byrne
John Byrne University of Delaware
David A. Waldman
David A. Waldman Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a diverse range of pathways, including counseling, research, and social services. Online psychology degrees make it possible for students to study from virtually anywhere, offering flexible schedules and accelerated programs.

One growing field is mental health counseling. Becoming a counselor requires a solid educational foundation followed by supervised clinical experience. For details on location-specific requirements, learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Boise, including necessary degrees and licensure steps.

Each state and city may have unique steps. It's essential to review the Boston mental health counselor education requirements as well as what’s needed to become a mental health counselor in Buffalo, as these will differ from one region to another.

Online programs can help you prepare to become a mental health counselor in Chandler or elsewhere, giving you valuable skills for roles in both clinical and community settings.

Best Scientists Citing James W. Smither

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles