World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5250 4870 2480 2257 126 9171

Richard R. Reilly publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard R. Reilly between 1969 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard R. Reilly published across 53 years, from 1969 to 2021, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2012. 2 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2012. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 3 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications
1969 2021

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard R. Reilly: publications per year, 1969 to 2021
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 1
1971 3
1972 5
1973 4
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 6
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 0
2000 4
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 4
2005 6
2006 7
2007 5
2008 9
2009 5
2010 7
2011 3
2012 12
2013 1
2014 3
2015 2
2016 3
2017 0
2018 0
2019 2
2020 0
2021 2
Total 131
Download as CSV

Richard R. Reilly publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard R. Reilly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 126
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard R. Reilly D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard R. Reilly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Management
  • Social psychology
  • Project management

His primary scientific interests are in New product development, Social psychology, Applied psychology, Process and Personality. His New product development study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Knowledge management, Structural equation modeling, Competitive advantage, Industrial organization and Voice of the customer. Social psychology and Control are commonly linked in his work.

Richard R. Reilly combines subjects such as Construct validity, Criterion validity and Checklist with his study of Applied psychology. His research in Process intersects with topics in Spite, Organizational performance and Balanced scorecard. His Personality research includes elements of Willingness to recommend, Standard written English and Cognitive test.

His most cited work include:

  • APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES (429 citations)
  • DOES PERFORMANCE IMPROVE FOLLOWING MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK? A THEORETICAL MODEL, META‐ANALYSIS, AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS (417 citations)
  • Beyond the Balanced Scorecard (206 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns New product development, Knowledge management, Social psychology, Personality and Process. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Industrial organization and Process management. His work carried out in the field of Knowledge management brings together such families of science as Empirical research and Task.

His work is dedicated to discovering how Social psychology, Applied psychology are connected with Affect and Test validity and other disciplines. His Personality research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Developmental psychology, Psychometrics and Personnel selection. His Process course of study focuses on Experiential learning and Capability Maturity Model.

He most often published in these fields:

  • New product development (29.90%)
  • Knowledge management (25.77%)
  • Social psychology (24.74%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?

  • New product development (29.90%)
  • Knowledge management (25.77%)
  • Autonomy (4.12%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are New product development, Knowledge management, Autonomy, Public relations and Empirical research. His New product development research incorporates elements of Absorptive capacity, Industrial organization and Process management. His Knowledge management study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Social psychology.

His study connects Incremental validity and Social psychology. His work in the fields of Business ethics overlaps with other areas such as Personal style, Quality of Life Research, Qualitative research and Management practices. Richard R. Reilly interconnects Situational leadership theory, Creative problem-solving and Information processing theory in the investigation of issues within Empirical research.

Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • New Product Development Speed: Too Much of a Good Thing? (79 citations)
  • The relationship between team autonomy and new product development performance under different levels of technological turbulence (40 citations)
  • Prototyping, customer involvement, and speed of information dissemination in new product success (11 citations)

Best Publications

  • DOES PERFORMANCE IMPROVE FOLLOWING MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK? A THEORETICAL MODEL, META-ANALYSIS, AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS

    James W. Smither;Manuel London;Richard R. Reilly

  • APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES

    James W. Smither;Richard R. Reilly;Roger E. Millsap;Kenneth Pearlman At T

  • Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights – A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss

    Brian J. Sauser;Richard R. Reilly;Aaron J. Shenhar

  • Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: A meta-analysis

    Jiyao Chen;Fariborz Damanpour;Richard R. Reilly

  • VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES

    Unknown

  • The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: the moderating effects of uncertainty

    Jiyao Chen;R.R. Reilly;G.S. Lynn

  • Beyond the Balanced Scorecard

    Alan C. Maltz;Aaron J. Shenhar;Richard R. Reilly

  • AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF AN UPWARD FEEDBACK PROGRAM OVER TIME

    James W. Smither;Manuel London;Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos;Richard R. Reilly

  • Knowledge management in new product teams: practices and outcomes

    G.S. Lynn;R.R. Reilly;A.E. Akgun

  • A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF UPWARD FEEDBACK

    Richard R. Reilly;James W. Smither;Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos

  • The Effects of Peer Feedback on Team Member Behavior

    Peter G. Dominick;Richard R. Reilly;Jack W. Mcgourty

  • AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF USING BEHAVIOR CHECKLISTS ON THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS

    Richard R. Reilly;Sarah Henry;James W. Smither

  • Why Do We Trust? Moving Beyond Individual to Dyadic Perceptions

    Maria Yakovleva;Richard R. Reilly;Robert Werko

  • New Product Development Speed: Too Much of a Good Thing?

    Jiyao Chen;Richard R. Reilly;Gary S. Lynn

  • The role of personality in new product development team performance

    Richard R Reilly;Gary S Lynn;Zvi H Aronson

  • The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty

    Zvi H. Aronson;Richard R. Reilly;Gary S. Lynn

  • Toward a NASA-Specific Project Management Framework

    Aaron Shenhar;Dov Dvir;Dragan Milosevic;Jerry Mulenburg

  • Multi‐dimensionality of learning in new product development teams

    Ali E. Akgu¨n;Gary S. Lynn;Richard Reilly

  • Faking Biodata Tests Are Option-Keyed Instruments More Resistant?

    Avraham N. Kluger;Richard R. Reilly;Craig J. Russell

  • Effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: Contrast versus assimilation revisited.

    James W. Smither;Richard R. Reilly;Richard Buda

  • Localized sources of knowledge and the effect of knowledge spillovers: an empirical study of inventors in the telecommunications industry

    Sherwat E. Ibrahim;M. Hosein Fallah;Richard R. Reilly

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary S. Lynn
Gary S. Lynn Stevens Institute of Technology
James W. Smither
James W. Smither La Salle University
Aaron J. Shenhar
Aaron J. Shenhar Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Manuel London
Manuel London Stony Brook University
Donald O. Neubaum
Donald O. Neubaum Florida Atlantic University
Jerry N. Luftman
Jerry N. Luftman Global Institute for IT Management
Roger E. Millsap
Roger E. Millsap Arizona State University
Brian Sauser
Brian Sauser University of North Texas
Sheldon Zedeck
Sheldon Zedeck University of California, Berkeley
Ali E. Akgün
Ali E. Akgün Yıldız Technical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a variety of flexible and accessible educational pathways. Many students are turning to online master programs that can be completed in as little as one year. These programs allow learners to boost their career potential while balancing other commitments.

For those seeking a faster route to a bachelor’s degree, accelerated online degrees offer condensed coursework and flexible scheduling. This is an ideal option for adult learners or those wishing to enter the job market quickly.

Cost is a major consideration for many students pursuing advanced humanities and social sciences degrees. Fortunately, there are cheapest online msw options that provide both quality and affordability for those entering social work and related fields.

Additionally, professionals interested in behavior analysis can find bcba programs that are recognized for both their affordability and academic rigor. These diverse online opportunities expand access to rewarding career paths while accommodating different life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Richard R. Reilly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles