World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 67 2548 2332 1475 1319 137 28298

Nicholas Epley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicholas Epley between 1998 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicholas Epley published across 27 years, from 1998 to 2024, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2017. 8 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2017. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications
1998 2024

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicholas Epley: publications per year, 1998 to 2024
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 2
2004 7
2005 8
2006 10
2007 6
2008 12
2009 4
2010 8
2011 2
2012 2
2013 4
2014 12
2015 5
2016 7
2017 14
2018 6
2019 4
2020 4
2021 8
2022 11
2023 5
2024 3
Total 152
Download as CSV

Nicholas Epley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Epley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicholas Epley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Epley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 67
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Nicholas Epley is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a specific focus on subfields such as Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

The main topics covered in Epley's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology, Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Cultural Differences and Values, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction.

Among Epley's recent papers are:

  • "Overly shallow?: Miscalibrated expectations create a barrier to deeper conversation." (2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • "Demeaning: Dehumanizing others by minimizing the importance of their psychological needs." (2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • "It's surprisingly nice to hear you: Misunderstanding the impact of communication media can lead to suboptimal choices of how to connect with others." (2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General)
  • "Undersociality: miscalibrated social cognition can inhibit social connection" (2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  • "Defining key concepts for mental state attribution" (2024, Communications Psychology)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Epley include Amit Kumar, Michael Kardas, Juliana Schroeder, Xuan Zhao, and James Dungan.

Common publication venues for Epley's work include:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Psychological Science
  • Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings

In 2015, Nicholas Epley was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.

    Nicholas Epley;Adam Waytz;John T. Cacioppo

  • Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment

    Nicholas Epley;Boaz Keysar;Leaf Van Boven;Thomas Gilovich

  • The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle

    Adam Waytz;Joy Heafner;Nicholas Epley

  • The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic Why the Adjustments Are Insufficient

    Nicholas Epley;Thomas Gilovich

  • Who Sees Human?: The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism

    Adam Waytz;John Cacioppo;Nicholas Epley

  • Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.

    Adam L. Alter;Daniel M. Oppenheimer;Nicholas Epley;Rebecca N. Eyre

  • Feeling "holier than thou": are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?

    Nicholas Epley;David Dunning

  • WHEN WE NEED A HUMAN: MOTIVATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ANTHROPOMORPHISM

    Nicholas Epley;Adam Waytz;Scott Akalis;John T. Cacioppo

  • Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors

    Nicholas Epley;Thomas Gilovich

  • Creating Social Connection Through Inferential Reproduction: Loneliness and Perceived Agency in Gadgets, Gods, and Greyhounds

    Nicholas Epley;Scott Akalis;Adam Waytz;John T. Cacioppo

  • Causes and consequences of mind perception

    Adam Waytz;Kurt James Gray;Nicholas Epley;Daniel M. Wegner

  • Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction

    Nicholas Epley;Carey K Morewedge;Boaz Keysar

  • Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.

    Adam Waytz;Carey K. Morewedge;Nicholas Epley;George Monteleone

  • Egocentrism over e-mail: Can we communicate as well as we think?

    Justin Kruger;Nicholas Epley;Jason Parker;Zhi-Wen Ng

  • When perspective taking increases taking: reactive egoism in social interaction.

    Nicholas Epley;Eugene M. Caruso;Max H. Bazerman

  • Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention

    Shuhong Lin;Boaz Keysar;Nicholas Epley

  • When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors

    Nicholas Epley;Thomas Gilovich

  • Social Cognition Unbound Insights Into Anthropomorphism and Dehumanization

    Adam Waytz;Nicholas Epley;John T. Cacioppo

  • Mistakenly seeking solitude.

    Nicholas Epley;Juliana Schroeder

  • The Mechanics of Motivated Reasoning

    Nicholas Epley;Thomas Gilovich

  • Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment

    Nicholas Epley;Boaz Keysar;Thomas Gilovich;Leaf Van Boven

  • The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic the Adjustments Are Insufficient

    Nicholas Epley;Thomas Gilovich

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam Waytz
Adam Waytz Northwestern University
Thomas Gilovich
Thomas Gilovich Cornell University
John T. Cacioppo
John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago
Max H. Bazerman
Max H. Bazerman Harvard University
Leaf Van Boven
Leaf Van Boven University of Colorado Boulder
Boaz Keysar
Boaz Keysar University of Chicago
David Dunning
David Dunning University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ayse K. Uskul
Ayse K. Uskul University of Sussex
Daniel M. Wegner
Daniel M. Wegner Harvard University
Kurt Gray
Kurt Gray University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and related counseling fields opens up a variety of dynamic career pathways. With growing demand for mental health professionals, online counseling programs offer flexible options for those seeking to study while balancing work or family commitments.

Locations like California and Texas are known for their concentration of reputable institutions. For example, students seeking the most popular counseling programs in San Francisco can find a variety of accredited programs suited to urban environments. Similarly, if your interests lie in smaller cities, there are most popular counseling degree programs in Stockton that provide specialized local perspectives.

Texas serves as another hotspot with an array of best-ranked counseling degree programs in Texas, designed to address the state's unique community needs. On a national scale, reviewing popular counseling programs in the US can help you compare curriculum, faculty expertise, and graduation outcomes across leading colleges and universities.

Whether you're planning to become a licensed counselor, psychologist, or pursue a niche in organizational or school counseling, online degrees provide flexibility and access to diverse, high-quality programs nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Epley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles