World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joachim I. Krueger

Joachim I. Krueger

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
20007
World Ranking
4498
National Ranking
2497

Joachim I. Krueger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim I. Krueger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joachim I. Krueger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim I. Krueger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joachim I. Krueger is affiliated with Brown University in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of Psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work extensively covers several main topics, notably the Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation, Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion, as well as Cultural Differences and Values.

Joachim I. Krueger has contributed numerous publications to various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • The American Journal of Psychology
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Psychological Inquiry
  • Genome biology

Some of the most recent papers authored or co-authored by Krueger include:

  • "Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints." (2021) published in Psychological Methods
  • "Social game theory: Preferences, perceptions, and choices" (2020) published in European Review of Social Psychology
  • "Strategic Thinking: A Random Walk Into the Rabbit Hole" (2021) published in Collabra Psychology
  • "The data-hypothesis relationship" (2021) published in Genome biology
  • "Feeling good without doing good: Comment on Orth and Robins (2022)." (2022) published in American Psychologist

Frequent collaborators of Joachim I. Krueger include:

  • David Joachim Grüning
  • Patrick R. Heck
  • Johannes Ullrich
  • André P. Dieskau
  • Jorma Hassfeld

This profile reflects the interdisciplinary nature of Krueger's work, bridging psychological theory and practice with social and behavioral economic frameworks. Their research contributions are documented with a combination of theoretical perspectives and empirical studies in a variety of well-regarded venues within the field of psychology and related disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?

    RF Baumeister;JD Campbell;JI Krueger;KD Vohs

  • The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.

    Peter Fischer;Joachim I. Krueger;Tobias Greitemeyer;Claudia Vogrincic

  • Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis:

    Jordan M. Robbins;Joachim I. Krueger

  • The Truly False Consensus Effect: An Ineradicable and Egocentric Bias in Social Perception

    Joachim Krueger;Russell W. Clement

  • Towards a balanced social psychology: causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition

    Joachim I. Krueger;David C. Funder

  • Exploding the self-esteem myth.

    Roy F. Baumeister;Jennifer D. Campbell;Joachim I. Krueger;Kathleen D. Vohs

  • On the Perception of Social Consensus

    Joachim Krueger

  • Developmental Expectations for the Self and Most Other People: Age Grading in Three Functions of Social Comparison

    Jutta Heckhausen;Joachim Krueger

  • Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than-average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance.

    Joachim Krueger;Ross A. Mueller

  • Enhancement Bias in Descriptions of Self and Others

    Joachim Krueger

  • Social psychology: A field in search of a center

    Joachim I. Krueger;David C. Funder

  • Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality.

    Joachim Krueger;Myron Rothbart

  • Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics.

    Joachim Krueger

  • Null hypothesis significance testing. On the survival of a flawed method.

    Joachim Krueger

  • Social categorization moderates social projection.

    Russell W. Clement;Joachim Krueger

  • From social projection to social behaviour

    Joachim I. Krueger

  • The Long Way From α-Error Control to Validity Proper Problems With a Short-Sighted False-Positive Debate

    Klaus Fiedler;Florian Kutzner;Joachim I. Krueger

  • The Projective Perception of the Social World

    Joachim Krueger

  • The Psychology (and Economics) of Trust

    Anthony M. Evans;Joachim I. Krueger

  • Two Egocentric Sources of the Decision to Vote: The Voter's Illusion and the Belief in Personal Relevance

    Melissa Acevedo;Joachim I. Krueger

  • A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Herbert Gintis;George Ainslie;Larry Arnhart;R. Alexander Bentley

  • "The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception": Correction.

    Joachim Krueger;Russell W. Clement

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Fischer
Peter Fischer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jan J. Koenderink
Jan J. Koenderink Delft University of Technology
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Kathleen D. Vohs
Kathleen D. Vohs University of Minnesota
Teppo Felin
Teppo Felin University of Oxford
Dieter Frey
Dieter Frey Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jutta Heckhausen
Jutta Heckhausen University of California, Irvine
David C. Funder
David C. Funder University of California, Riverside
Tobias Greitemeyer
Tobias Greitemeyer University of Innsbruck
Keith E. Stanovich
Keith E. Stanovich University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens up various rewarding career paths. One of the most in-demand options is becoming a mental health counselor. Online psychology programs not only offer flexible learning but also pave the way toward state-specific counseling credentials.

Career requirements can differ based on location. If you want to become a mental health counselor in Atlanta, you’ll find unique licensure steps and training prerequisites. Similarly, those interested in how to become a mental health counselor in Aurora should review regional educational requirements and local job market trends.

For students evaluating mental health counselor requirements in Austin, or investigating mental health counselor requirements in Bakersfield, it’s important to research your state’s licensing process. Many roles require a master’s degree, supervised clinical hours, and a passing score on a standardized exam.

Online psychology degrees can provide the foundational knowledge and flexibility you need to pursue counseling, social work, or other allied health professions, preparing you for a meaningful career wherever you choose to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim I. Krueger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles