World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3691 3404 393 373 193 13906

Richard J. Crisp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard J. Crisp between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard J. Crisp published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2014. 5 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2014. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1999 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard J. Crisp: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 3
2004 7
2005 10
2006 15
2007 7
2008 9
2009 16
2010 15
2011 13
2012 13
2013 17
2014 18
2015 16
2016 7
2017 11
2018 6
2019 4
2020 7
2021 4
2022 5
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 221
Download as CSV

Richard J. Crisp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Crisp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 193 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 193
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard J. Crisp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Crisp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Richard J. Crisp is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans Social Sciences and Psychology, with a significant focus on Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. Additional subfields include Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, and Health.

The main topics covered in their work include Social and Intergroup Psychology, Cultural Differences and Values, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Social and Cultural Dynamics, Emotions and Moral Behavior, and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression.

Several recent papers authored by Richard J. Crisp are as follows:

  • "40 Years of Multiple Social Categorization: A Tool for Social Inclusivity," 2020, European Review of Social Psychology
  • "Perceptions of Emotional Functionality: Similarities and Differences Among Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultures," 2022, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • "Fluctuations in Prejudice Do Not Track Fluctuations in Ordinary Contact in Three 5-Wave "Shortitudinal" Studies Examining Daily, Weekly, or Monthly Intervals," 2024, Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Let's stay close: An examination of the effects of imagined contact on behavior toward children with disability," 2022, Social Development
  • "Building bonds: A pre-registered secondary data analysis examining linear and curvilinear relations between socio-economic status and communal attitudes," 2022, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard J. Crisp include:

  • Deborah Shulman
  • Rose Meleady
  • Gordon Hodson
  • Gian Antonio Di Bernardo
  • Loris Vezzali

The common publication venues where their work appears include:

  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • European Review of Social Psychology
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • Social Development

Awards received by Richard J. Crisp comprise the Spearman Medal from the British Psychological Society in 2006 and a fellowship of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact.

    Richard J. Crisp;Rhiannon N. Turner

  • Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Improve Intergroup Attitudes

    Rhiannon N. Turner;Richard J. Crisp;Emily Lambert

  • Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity.

    Richard J. Crisp;Rhiannon N. Turner

  • Multiple social categorization

    Richard J. Crisp;Miles Hewstone

  • A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis

    Eleanor Miles;Richard J. Crisp

  • Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals.

    Serge Guimond;Armand Chatard;Delphine Martinot;Richard J. Crisp

  • Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice

    Rhiannon N. Turner;Richard J. Crisp

  • Essential Social Psychology

    Richard J. Crisp;Rhiannon N. Turner

  • Recategorization and Subgroup Identification: Predicting and Preventing Threats From Common Ingroups

    Richard J. Crisp;Catriona H. Stone;Natalie Rebecca Hall

  • Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts.

    Serge Guimond;Richard J Crisp;Pierre De Oliveira;Rodolphe Kamiejski

  • Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect

    Senel Husnu;Richard J. Crisp

  • Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups

    Sofia Stathi;Richard J. Crisp

  • Imagined Intergroup Contact: Theory, Paradigm and Practice

    Richard J. Crisp;Sofia Stathi;Rhiannon N. Turner;Senel Husnu

  • Reducing Stereotype Threat by Blurring Intergroup Boundaries

    Harriet E. S. Rosenthal;Richard J. Crisp

  • Threat Inoculation: Experienced and Imagined Intergenerational Contact Prevents Stereotype Threat Effects on Older People's Math Performance

    Dominic Abrams;Richard J. Crisp;Sibila Marques;Emily Fagg

  • Differential Evaluation of Crossed Category Groups: Patterns, Processes, and Reducing Intergroup Bias:

    Richard J. Crisp;Miles Hewstone

  • Hope in the Middle East: Malleability beliefs, hope, and the willingness to compromise for peace

    Smadar Cohen-Chen;Smadar Cohen-Chen;Eran Halperin;Richard J. Crisp;James J. Gross

  • The Imagined Contact Hypothesis

    Richard J. Crisp;Richard J. Crisp;Rhiannon N. Turner

  • From imagery to intention:A dual route model of imagined contact effects

    Richard J. Crisp;Senel Husnu;Rose Meleady;Sofia Stathi

  • Imagined Intergroup Contact: A New Technique for Encouraging Greater Inter-Ethnic Contact in Cyprus

    Senel Husnu;Richard J. Crisp

Frequent Co-Authors

Rhiannon N. Turner
Rhiannon N. Turner Queen's University Belfast
Miles Hewstone
Miles Hewstone University of Oxford
Loris Vezzali
Loris Vezzali University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Mark Rubin
Mark Rubin Durham University
Alberto Voci
Alberto Voci University of Padua
Serge Guimond
Serge Guimond University of Clermont Auvergne
Michael A. Hogg
Michael A. Hogg Claremont Graduate University
Dominic Abrams
Dominic Abrams University of Kent
Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain
James J. Gross
James J. Gross Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online study options and career pathways, particularly in counseling. As demand for mental health professionals continues to rise, many students seek programs that are both flexible and affordable. Online psychology and counseling degrees cater to these needs, offering accessibility for students across different states.

Affordability is a major concern for prospective students. Those interested in the most affordable counseling degree programs in San Diego will find several budget-conscious alternatives without compromising on quality. Similarly, for those on the West Coast, exploring the cheapest counseling degrees in Seattle can help manage tuition expenses.

Students in the Southwest can benefit from information about affordable counseling programs in Tempe, which provide more opportunities at a reasonable cost. For those considering the Southern U.S., the most affordable counseling degree programs in Texas offer robust training and lower tuition rates.

Exploring these options helps students make informed decisions about their education and future careers in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Crisp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles