World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert A. Monserud

Robert A. Monserud

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
10396
World Ranking
5709
National Ranking
1948

Robert A. Monserud publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Monserud sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Robert A. Monserud D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Monserud sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert A. Monserud is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their research spans several areas within environmental science, with a focus on forest ecosystems and the impacts of climate on species distribution.

The main fields of study for Monserud include:

  • Environmental Science

The subfields of study encompass:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Ecology

Monserud's work addresses multiple key topics relevant to forest and ecological research. These topics include:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management

Their recent publication record features a paper titled "Species, Climatypes, Climate Change, and Forest Health: A Conversion of Science to Practice for Inland Northwest (USA) Forests", published in 2020 in the journal Forests. This paper has been cited several times and examines the practical applications of scientific findings related to forest health and climate types in the Inland Northwest region of the United States.

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Monserud include:

  • Gerald E. Rehfeldt
  • Marcus V. Warwell

Monserud's research contributions have appeared predominantly in the journal:

  • Forests

The scope of Monserud's work integrates empirical modeling and analysis to understand how climate change influences species distribution patterns and forest health, particularly in relation to fire ecology and insect dynamics within forest systems.

Best Publications

  • A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate

    I. Colin Prentice;Wolfgang Cramer;Sandy P. Harrison;Rik Leemans

  • Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic

    Robert A. Monserud;Rik Leemans

  • A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even- and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria

    Robert A. Monserud;Hubert Sterba

  • Modeling individual tree mortality for Austrian forest species

    Robert A. Monserud;Robert A. Monserud;Hubert Sterba;Hubert Sterba

  • Height Growth and Site Index Curves for Inland Douglas-fir Based on Stem Analysis Data and Forest Habitat Type

    Robert A. Monserud

  • Simulation of forest tree mortality

    Robert A. Monserud

  • A crown ratio model for Austrian forests

    Hubert Hasenauer;Robert A. Monserud

  • Homeostatic gas-exchange parameters inferred from 13C/12C in tree rings of conifers.

    John D. Marshall;Robert A. Monserud

  • Effects of diversity of tree species and size on forest basal area growth, recruitment, and mortality

    Jingjing Liang;Joseph Buongiorno;Robert A. Monserud;Eric L. Kruger

  • Time-series analyses of tree-ring chronologies

    Ra Monserud

  • Allometric crown relations in three northern Idaho conifer species

    Robert A Monserud;John D Marshall

  • Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands: II. effects of decision criteria

    Robert G. Haight;Robert A. Monserud

  • Time-series analysis of δ13C from tree rings. I. Time trends and autocorrelation

    Robert A. Monserud;John D. Marshall

  • An evaluation of diagnostic tests and their roles in validating forest biometric models

    Yuqing Yang;Robert A Monserud;Shongming Huang

  • Foliage height influences specific leaf area of three conifer species

    John D Marshall;Robert A Monserud

  • Applicability of the forest stand growth simulator PROGNAUS for the Austrian part of the Bohemian Massif

    Hubert Sterba;Robert A. Monserud

  • Performance and comparison of stand growth models based on individual tree and diameter class growth

    Alan R. Ek;Robert A. Monserud

  • Global vegetation change predicted by the modified Budyko model

    Robert A. Monserud;Nadja M. Tchebakova;Rik Leemans

  • Do individual-tree growth models correctly represent height:diameter ratios of Norway spruce and Scots pine?

    Sonja Vospernik;Robert A. Monserud;Hubert Sterba

  • Growth and yield of all-aged Douglas-fir western hemlock forest stands: a matrix model with stand diversity effects

    Jingjing Liang;Joseph Buongiorno;Robert A Monserud

  • Biased predictions for tree height increment models developed from smoothed ‘data’

    Hubert Hasenauer;Robert A. Monserud

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron R. Weiskittel
Aaron R. Weiskittel University of Maine
Hubert Sterba
Hubert Sterba BOKU University
John D. Marshall
John D. Marshall University of Gothenburg
Joseph Buongiorno
Joseph Buongiorno University of Wisconsin–Madison
Douglas A. Maguire
Douglas A. Maguire Oregon State University
N. M. Tchebakova
N. M. Tchebakova Sukachev Institute of Forest
Robert G. Haight
Robert G. Haight US Forest Service
Gerald E. Rehfeldt
Gerald E. Rehfeldt US Forest Service
Hubert Hasenauer
Hubert Hasenauer BOKU University
Eric L. Kruger
Eric L. Kruger University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Ecology and Evolution, there are diverse online degree options and career pathways to consider. Many students choose healthcare-related fields, where flexible and specialized online programs are available. For example, online direct entry msn programs offer a fast-track for non-nurses looking to enter advanced nursing roles. These programs allow students from various undergraduate backgrounds, including biology or environmental science, to quickly qualify in the medical sector.

When comparing healthcare education providers, understanding the differences between schools is crucial. Resources like this overview of chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program can clarify which university aligns best with your goals. In addition, rn to msn bridge programs provide affordable, flexible routes for registered nurses wanting to advance their careers.

Students seeking reputable online degrees should also consider enrolling at non profit online schools. These accredited institutions often provide higher quality standards and greater value for your investment—key factors in building a strong foundation for careers in science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Monserud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles