World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
6981
World Ranking
8806
National Ranking
10

N. M. Tchebakova publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where N. M. Tchebakova sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

N. M. Tchebakova D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where N. M. Tchebakova sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests

    Jingjing Liang;Thomas W. Crowther;Nicolas Picard;Susan Wiser

  • Climate-induced boreal forest change: Predictions versus current observations

    Amber J. Soja;Nadezda M. Tchebakova;Nancy H.F. French;Michael D. Flannigan

  • Productivity of forests in the Eurosiberian boreal region and their potential to act as a carbon sink –- a synthesis

    E.-D. Schulze;J. Lloyd;F. M. Kelliher;C. Wirth

  • Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris

    Gerald E. Rehfeldt;Nadejda M. Tchebakova;Yelena I. Parfenova;William R. Wykoff

  • The effects of climate, permafrost and fire on vegetation change in Siberia in a changing climate

    Unknown

  • An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory based, eddy covariance and inversion methods

    A. J. Dolman;A. Shvidenko;D. Schepaschenko;P. Ciais

  • Reviews and syntheses: Arctic fire regimes and emissions in the 21st century

    Jessica L. McCarty;Juha Aalto;Juha Aalto;Ville-Veikko Paunu;Steve R. Arnold

  • Seasonal and annual variations in the photosynthetic productivity and carbon balance of a central Siberian pine forest

    Jon Lloyd;Olga Shibistova;Daniil Zolotoukhine;Olaf Kolle

  • Effects of Fire and Climate on Successions and Structural Changes in The Siberian Boreal Forest

    Valentin V. Furyaev;Eugene A. Vaganov;Nadejda M. Tchebakova;Erik N. Valendik

  • Assessing Population Responses to Climate in Pinus sylvestris and Larix spp. of Eurasia with Climate-Transfer Models

    Gerald E. Rehfeldt;Nadejda M. Tchebakova;Leonid I. Milyutin;Elena I. Parfenova

  • Global vegetation change predicted by the modified Budyko model

    Robert A. Monserud;Nadja M. Tchebakova;Rik Leemans

  • Comparative ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of energy and mass in a European Russian and a central Siberian bog I. Interseasonal and interannual variability of energy and latent heat fluxes during the snowfree period

    Juliya Kurbatova;Almut Arneth;Natasha N. Vygodskaya;Olaf Kolle

  • Response of evapotranspiration and water availability to changing climate and land cover on the Mongolian Plateau during the 21st century

    Yaling Liu;Qianlai Zhuang;Min Chen;Zhihua Pan

  • Northern Eurasia Future Initiative (NEFI): facing the challenges and pathways of global change in the twenty-first century

    Pavel Ya Groisman;Pavel Ya Groisman;Herman Shugart;David W. Kicklighter;Geoffrey Henebry

  • Three years of trace gas observations over the EuroSiberian domain derived from aircraft sampling – a concerted action

    Ingeborg Levin;Philippe Ciais;Ray Langenfelds;Martina Schmidt

  • Potential change in lodgepole pine site index and distribution under climatic change in Alberta

    Robert A. MonserudR.A. Monserud;Robert A. MonserudR.A. Monserud;Yuqing YangY. Yang;Yuqing YangY. Yang;Shongming HuangS. Huang;Shongming HuangS. Huang;Nadja TchebakovaN. Tchebakova;Nadja TchebakovaN. Tchebakova

  • Climate Changes in Siberia

    Pavel Ya. Groisman;Tatiana A. Blyakharchuk;Alexander V. Chernokulsky;Maksim M. Arzhanov

  • Carbon balance assessment of a natural steppe of southern Siberia by multiple constraint approach

    L. Belelli Marchesini;D. Papale;M. Reichstein;N. Vuichard

  • Agroclimatic potential across central Siberia in an altered twenty-first century

    N. M. Tchebakova;E. I. Parfenova;G. I. Lysanova;A. J. Soja

  • The Eurosiberian Transect: an introduction to the experimental region

    E.-D. Schulze;N. N. Vygodskaya;N. M. Tchebakova;C. I. Czimczik

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, several online degree options can complement or enhance career prospects. Educators or professionals aiming for leadership roles may explore online eds to edd bridge program pathways, which provide a streamlined transition from a master’s to a doctorate in education.

If the traditional dissertation route seems daunting, there are multiple online doctoral programs without dissertation available. These programs emphasize applied knowledge and practical research, ideal for professionals seeking advanced credentials without the extended research commitment.

For those drawn to social and community impacts linked to environmental issues, pursuing online dsw programs offers an affordable way to gain advanced social work expertise. These degrees often focus on leadership and policy advocacy, which can align well with environmental justice careers.

Finally, individuals exploring flexible and cost-effective options might consider some of the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs provide a broad educational foundation with customizable coursework that can include environmental science topics, perfect for multidisciplinary interests.

Recently Published Articles