World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margarida Tomé

Margarida Tomé

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
8432
World Ranking
7012
National Ranking
38

Margarida Tomé publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margarida Tomé sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 226 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Margarida Tomé D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margarida Tomé sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margarida Tomé is affiliated with the University of Lisbon in Portugal and focuses their research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. The main areas of study addressed in their work include Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Insect Science, and Ecology. Their contributions span a diverse range of topics in forest science and ecosystem management.

The scientist's research topics cover:

  • Forest ecology and management
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management

Margarida Tomé has published articles in various scientific journals with several venues appearing frequently in their publication record:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Forests
  • European Journal of Forest Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Remote Sensing

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Margarida Tomé include:

  • "Concerns about reported harvests in European forests," 2021, Nature
  • "Opportunities and challenges of Eucalyptus plantations in Europe: the Iberian Peninsula experience," 2021, European Journal of Forest Research
  • "Comparison of linear regression, k-nearest neighbour and random forest methods in airborne laser-scanning-based prediction of growing stock," 2020, Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
  • "Shrub understorey clearing and drought affects water status and growth of juvenile Quercus suber trees," 2021, Forest Ecology and Management
  • "Effects of numbers of observations and predictors for various model types on the performance of forest inventory with airborne laser scanning," 2021, Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Margarida Tomé frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Joana Amaral Paulo
  • Paulo N. Firmino
  • Susana Barreiro
  • Paula Soares
  • Diogo Nepomuceno Cosenza

Best Publications

  • Modeling Forest Trees and Stands

    Harold E. Burkhart;Margarida Tomé

  • Distance-Dependent Competition Measures for Predicting Growth of Individual Trees

    Margarida Tomé;Harold E. Burkhart

  • Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union

    Michael den Herder;Gerardo Moreno;Rosa M. Mosquera-Losada;João H.N. Palma

  • Evaluating a growth model for forest management using continuous forest inventory data

    Paula Soares;Margarida Tomé;J P Skovsgaard;Jerome K Vanclay

  • 3-D mapping of a multi-layered Mediterranean forest using ALS data

    António Ferraz;António Ferraz;Frédéric Bretar;Stéphane Jacquemoud;Gil Gonçalves

  • Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives

    Miren del Río;Miren del Río;Hans Pretzsch;Iciar Alberdi;Kamil Bielak

  • Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting.

    Kristina Blennow;Johannes Persson;Margarida Tomé;Marc Hanewinkel

  • Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests?

    Christopher P.O. Reyer;Stephen Bathgate;Kristina Blennow;Jose G. Borges

  • A generalized nonlinear mixed-effects height-diameter model for Eucalyptus globulus L. in northwestern Spain.

    Felipe Crecente-Campo;Margarida Tomé;Paula Soares;Ulises Diéguez-Aranda

  • Effect of tree, stand, and site variables on the allometry of Eucalyptus globulus tree biomass

    Nuno AntónioN. António;Margarida ToméM. Tomé;José ToméJ. Tomé;Paula SoaresP. Soares

  • Height-diameter equation for first rotation eucalypt plantations in Portugal.

    Paula Soares;Margarida Tomé

  • How Sensitive Are Ecosystem Services in European Forest Landscapes to Silvicultural Treatment

    Peter Biber;José G. Borges;Ralf Moshammer;Susana Barreiro

  • Modeling dominant height growth : Eucalyptus plantations in Portugal

    Ana Amaro;David Reed;Margarida Tomé;Isabel Themido

  • Modelling spatial and temporal variability in a zero-inflated variable: The case of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) cone production

    Rafael Calama;Sven Mutke;José Tomé;Javier Gordo

  • The effect of organic-matter management on the productivity of Eucalyptus globulus stands in Spain and Portugal: tree growth and harvest residue decomposition in relation to site and treatment

    H.E Jones;M Madeira;L Herraez;J Dighton

  • Comparison of ALS- and UAV(SfM)-derived high-density point clouds for individual tree detection in Eucalyptus plantations

    Juan Guerra-Hernández;Diogo N. Cosenza;Luiz Carlos Estraviz Rodriguez;Margarida Silva

  • Use of multi-temporal UAV-derived imagery for estimating individual tree growth in Pinus pinea stands

    Juan Guerra-Hernández;Eduardo González-Ferreiro;Vicente J. Monleón;Sonia P. Faias

  • Site index model for Pinus sylvestris in north-east Spain

    M Palahı́;M Tomé;T Pukkala;A Trasobares

  • State of Europe's forests 2015

    Iciar Alberdi Asensio;Tanya Baycheva-Merger;Alain Bouvet;Michele Bozzano

  • Concerns about reported harvests in European forests

    Marc Palahí;Rubén Valbuena;Cornelius Senf;Nezha Acil

  • Sustainable Forest Management

    Klaus von Gadow;Timo Pukkala;Margarida Tomé

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold E. Burkhart
Harold E. Burkhart Virginia Tech
Paula Soares
Paula Soares University of Porto
Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo
Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya
Marco Marchetti
Marco Marchetti University of Molise
Felipe Bravo
Felipe Bravo University of Valladolid
Gregorio Montero
Gregorio Montero Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
Marc Hanewinkel
Marc Hanewinkel University of Freiburg
Stéphane Jacquemoud
Stéphane Jacquemoud Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Miren del Río
Miren del Río University of Valladolid
João Santos Pereira
João Santos Pereira University of Lisbon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various related online degrees that complement this field. For students seeking a flexible and achievable option, exploring the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify programs that align well with your learning style and career goals.

For those interested in earth processes and sustainability, online geology programs provide solid foundations useful in environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation efforts. Similarly, integrating technology with environmental studies is possible through the best gis undergraduate programs, where skills in spatial analysis and data mapping enhance career prospects significantly.

For environmental professionals aiming to influence policy and administration, a Master of Public Administration can be a strategic choice. Accelerated options such as the mpa one year programs make it easier to advance leadership skills without long breaks from the workforce.

Choosing these pathways alongside Environmental Sciences creates a versatile and impactful career, addressing complex ecological challenges with a blend of science, technology, and policy expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Margarida Tomé

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles