World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
9224
World Ranking
5740
National Ranking
384

Marc Hanewinkel publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Hanewinkel sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Marc Hanewinkel D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Hanewinkel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Hanewinkel is affiliated with the University of Freiburg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a notable emphasis on global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, and ecology. The scientist has contributed extensively to these subfields, engaging in studies related to insect science and environmental engineering as well.

Hanewinkel's research covers topics central to forest ecosystems, including forest management and policy, forest ecology and management, as well as ecology and vegetation dynamics studies. Other significant aspects include plant water relations and carbon dynamics, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, conservation, biodiversity, and resource management, and tree root and stability studies.

Frequent co-authors of Hanewinkel include Rasoul Yousefpour, Lukas Baumbach, Anja Nölte, Thomas Hickler, and Barry Gardiner, indicating active collaboration within the environmental science and forestry research communities.

Their publications are often found in specialized venues, with the most frequent appearances in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Annals of Forest Science
  • Ecological Economics
  • Journal of Environmental Management

Recent papers authored by or including Hanewinkel cover various aspects of forest science and ecology:

  • Growth resistance and resilience of mixed silver fir and Norway spruce forests in central Europe: Contrasting responses to mild and severe droughts, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Concerns about reported harvests in European forests, 2021, Nature
  • Applying a science-based systems perspective to dispel misconceptions about climate effects of forest bioenergy, 2021, GCB Bioenergy
  • Can nature conservation and wood production be reconciled in managed forests? A review of driving factors for integrated forest management in Europe, 2020, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of retention forestry to enhance biodiversity in production forests of Central Europe using an interdisciplinary, multi-scale approach, 2020, Ecology and Evolution

Best Publications

  • Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land

    Marc Hanewinkel;Dominik A. Cullmann;Mart-Jan Schelhaas;Gert-Jan Nabuurs

  • Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition

    Georges Kunstler;Georges Kunstler;Daniel Falster;David A. Coomes;Francis Hui

  • Climate change and European forests: What do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management?

    Marcus Lindner;Joanne B. Fitzgerald;Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Christopher Reyer

  • A review of decision-making approaches to handle uncertainty and risk in adaptive forest management under climate change

    Rasoul Yousefpour;Jette Bredahl Jacobsen;Bo Jellesmark Thorsen;Henrik Meilby

  • Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting.

    Kristina Blennow;Johannes Persson;Margarida Tomé;Marc Hanewinkel

  • Are forest disturbances amplifying or canceling out climate change-induced productivity changes in European forests?

    Christopher P.O. Reyer;Stephen Bathgate;Kristina Blennow;Jose G. Borges

  • By 2050 the Mitigation Effects of EU Forests Could Nearly Double through Climate Smart Forestry

    Gert Jan Nabuurs;Philippe Delacote;David Ellison;Marc Hanewinkel

  • Assessing natural hazards in forestry for risk management: a review

    Marc Hanewinkel;Susan Hummel;Axel Albrecht

  • How does silviculture affect storm damage in forests of south-western Germany? Results from empirical modeling based on long-term observations

    Axel Albrecht;Marc Hanewinkel;Jürgen Bauhus;Ulrich Kohnle

  • An inventory-based approach for modeling single- tree storm damage — experiences with the winter storm of 1999 in southwestern Germany

    Matthias SchmidtM. Schmidt;Marc HanewinkelM. Hanewinkel;Gerald KändlerG. Kändler;Edgar KublinE. Kublin

  • Retention as an integrated biodiversity conservation approach for continuous-cover forestry in Europe

    Lena Gustafsson;Jürgen Bauhus;Thomas Asbeck;Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik

  • Digitization in wood supply – A review on how Industry 4.0 will change the forest value chain

    Fabian Müller;Dirk Jaeger;Marc Hanewinkel

  • Survival of Norway spruce remains higher in mixed stands under a dryer and warmer climate.

    Susanne Neuner;Axel Albrecht;Dominik Cullmann;Friedrich Engels

  • Growth resistance and resilience of mixed silver fir and Norway spruce forests in central Europe: Contrasting responses to mild and severe droughts.

    Alessandra Bottero;David I Forrester;David I Forrester;Maxime Cailleret;Ulrich Kohnle

  • Vulnerability of uneven-aged forests to storm damage

    Marc Hanewinkel;Thomas Kuhn;Harald Bugmann;Adrian Lanz

  • Alternative forest management strategies to account for climate change-induced productivity and species suitability changes in Europe

    Mart-Jan Schelhaas;Gert-Jan Nabuurs;Geerten Hengeveld;Chrristopher Reyer

  • A forest management risk insurance model and its application to coniferous stands in southwest Germany

    Jan Holecy;Marc Hanewinkel

  • Predicting constant decay rates of coarse woody debris - a meta-analysis approach with a mixed model.

    Jürgen Zell;Gerald Kändler;Marc Hanewinkel

  • Seventy-seven years of natural disturbances in a mountain forest area—the influence of storm, snow, and insect damage analysed with a long- term time series

    Marc HanewinkelM. Hanewinkel;Johannes BreidenbachJ. Breidenbach;Till NeeffT. Neeff;Edgar KublinE. Kublin

  • Concerns about reported harvests in European forests

    Marc Palahí;Rubén Valbuena;Cornelius Senf;Nezha Acil

  • Modelling and economic evaluation of forest biome shifts under climate change in Southwest Germany.

    Marc Hanewinkel;Susan Hummel;Dominik A. Cullmann

  • Modelling the conversion from even-aged to uneven-aged stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) with a distance-dependent growth simulator

    Marc Hanewinkel;Hans Pretzsch

Frequent Co-Authors

Rasoul Yousefpour
Rasoul Yousefpour University of Freiburg
Gert-Jan Nabuurs
Gert-Jan Nabuurs Wageningen University & Research
Marcus Lindner
Marcus Lindner European Forest Institute
Niklaus E. Zimmermann
Niklaus E. Zimmermann Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Harald Bugmann
Harald Bugmann ETH Zurich
Christopher P.O. Reyer
Christopher P.O. Reyer Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Jürgen Bauhus
Jürgen Bauhus University of Freiburg
Manfred J. Lexer
Manfred J. Lexer BOKU University
Margarida Tomé
Margarida Tomé University of Lisbon
Mart-Jan Schelhaas
Mart-Jan Schelhaas Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, pursuing advanced online degrees can provide valuable opportunities. Many students explore online ed d programs without dissertation as a flexible alternative to traditional doctorate paths, allowing them to focus on applied leadership rather than extensive research.

Additionally, professionals looking to transition smoothly between teaching credentials and doctoral studies often consider the eds to edd bridge program. This pathway supports educators in advancing their qualifications while continuing their careers.

For those interested in social impact, the dsw program offers a practical doctorate to develop leadership skills in social work without the lengthy dissertation process, which can complement environmental advocacy roles.

Students mindful of cost may also explore a low cost online general studies degree, providing a broad academic foundation that supports interdisciplinary approaches essential for addressing complex environmental challenges.

Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways can enhance your qualifications and open doors in environmental policy, education, social services, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Hanewinkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles