World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
39
Citations
6317
World Ranking
2122
National Ranking
156

Robin O. Cleveland publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin O. Cleveland sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 282 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Robin O. Cleveland D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin O. Cleveland sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robin O. Cleveland is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Medicine, with a focus on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Materials Chemistry, and Surgery.

The scientist's work centers on multiple key topics, including:

  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • "Transcranial ultrasound stimulation in humans is associated with an auditory confound that can be effectively masked," 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • "Transcranial ultrasound stimulation to human middle temporal complex improves visual motion detection and modulates electrophysiological responses," 2022, Brain Stimulation
  • "Dual-Array Passive Acoustic Mapping for Cavitation Imaging With Enhanced 2-D Resolution," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
  • "Effect of Acoustic Radiation Force on Displacement of Nanoparticles in Collagen Gels," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
  • "Dorsal Raphe Nucleus Controls Motivational State Transitions in Monkeys," 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Co-authorship patterns indicate collaboration with various researchers, including:

  • Eleanor Stride
  • Christopher Butler
  • Constantin Coussios
  • Xinghao Cheng
  • Michael Gray

Frequently publishing venues for Robin O. Cleveland include:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Stimulation
  • IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
  • Bioengineering

Best Publications

  • Ultrasound Neuromodulation: A Review of Results, Mechanisms and Safety.

    Joseph Blackmore;Shamit Shrivastava;Jerome Sallet;Chris R. Butler

  • Shock Wave Technology and Application: An Update

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Thomas Knoll;Kai Uwe Köhrmann;James A. McAteer

  • Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shockwaves

    Yuriy A. Pishchalnikov;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Michael R. Bailey;James C. Williams

  • FDTD simulation of finite-amplitude pressure and temperature fields for biomedical ultrasound

    Ibrahim M. Hallaj;Robin O. Cleveland

  • Experimental validation of a tractable numerical model for focused ultrasound heating in flow-through tissue phantoms.

    Jinlan Huang;R. Glynn Holt;Robin O. Cleveland;Ronald A. Roy

  • Time‐domain modeling of finite‐amplitude sound in relaxing fluids

    Robin O. Cleveland;Mark F. Hamilton;David T. Blackstock

  • Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy

    Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Vera A. Khokhlova;Michael R. Bailey;James C. Williams

  • Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy

    Robin O. Cleveland;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov

  • Numerical simulations of heating patterns and tissue temperature response due to high-intensity focused ultrasound

    F.P. Curra;P.D. Mourad;V.A. Khokhlova;R.O. Cleveland

  • Physics of Shock‐Wave Lithotripsy

    Robin O. Cleveland;James A. McAteer

  • Modeling of an electrohydraulic lithotripter with the KZK equation.

    Michalakis A. Averkiou;Robin O. Cleveland

  • Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on whole blood with and without microbubble contrast agent

    Sandra L B Poliachik;Wayne L. Chandler;Pierre D. Mourad;Michael R. Bailey

  • Acoustic Field of a Ballistic Shock Wave Therapy Device

    Robin O. Cleveland;Parag V. Chitnis;Scott R. McClure

  • Derivation of elastic stiffness from site-matched mineral density and acoustic impedance maps.

    Kay Raum;Kay Raum;Robin O Cleveland;Robin O Cleveland;Françoise Peyrin;Pascal Laugier

  • Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals

    A.Y. Ammi;R.O. Cleveland;J. Mamou;G.I. Wang

  • Design and characterization of a research electrohydraulic lithotripter patterned after the Dornier HM3

    Robin O. Cleveland;Michael R. Bailey;Naomi Fineberg;Bruce Hartenbaum

  • Cavitation detection during shock-wave lithotripsy.

    Michael R. Bailey;Yuri A. Pishchalnikov;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Robin O. Cleveland

  • A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.

    Robin O. Cleveland;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Michael R. Bailey;Lawrence A. Crum

  • Time domain simulation of nonlinear acoustic beams generated by rectangular pistons with application to harmonic imaging.

    Xinmai Yang;Robin O. Cleveland

  • Scattering of ultrasound in cancellous bone: predictions from a theoretical model.

    P.H.F Nicholson;R Strelitzki;R.O Cleveland;M.L Bouxsein

  • Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. I. Acoustic fields

    Michael R. Bailey;David T. Blackstock;Robin O. Cleveland;Lawrence A. Crum

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence A. Crum
Lawrence A. Crum University of Washington
Ronald A. Roy
Ronald A. Roy University of Oxford
Oleg A. Sapozhnikov
Oleg A. Sapozhnikov Lomonosov Moscow State University
Andrew P. Evan
Andrew P. Evan Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Constantin C. Coussios
Constantin C. Coussios University of Oxford
Vera A. Khokhlova
Vera A. Khokhlova Lomonosov Moscow State University
Eric L. Miller
Eric L. Miller Tufts University
Tim Colonius
Tim Colonius California Institute of Technology
Ann C. McKee
Ann C. McKee Boston University
Robert C. Cantu
Robert C. Cantu Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, pursuing related online degrees can offer valuable career opportunities. Degrees in fields like counseling, applied behavior analysis, speech-language pathology, and audiology provide alternative paths in growing industries.

Many online programs focus on accessibility and flexibility, with options such as the easiest counseling degrees designed to balance academic rigor with practical experience. These programs can serve as excellent complements for engineers interested in leadership or human factors roles.

For professionals considering advanced certifications, accelerated options like the accelerated bcba program allow quicker entry into specialized behavioral analysis careers. These programs emphasize practical skills, often appealing to those seeking a new focus or career pivot.

Speech and hearing sciences also present promising fields. Understanding the slp grad school admission process is crucial for aspiring speech-language pathologists, while exploring the easiest audiology programs to get into can help students identify programs that fit their academic profiles.

Overall, these related online degrees offer diverse career pathways that can complement an engineering background, providing professionals with unique skills to innovate and lead across multiple disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Robin O. Cleveland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles