World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
46
Citations
6731
World Ranking
4300
National Ranking
1662

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Seismology
  • Plate tectonics
  • Optics

Seismology, Seismic wave, Induced seismicity, Crust and Fault are his primary areas of study. His study in Amplitude extends to Seismology with its themes. His Amplitude study combines topics in areas such as Attenuation and Basin and Range Province.

His Seismic wave research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Rift, Tomography and Pit crater, Caldera. While the research belongs to areas of Induced seismicity, Harley M. Benz spends his time largely on the problem of Sequence, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Precambrian. When carried out as part of a general Fault research project, his work on Strike-slip tectonics is frequently linked to work in Basement, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.

His most cited work include:

  • Three‐dimensional P and S wave velocity structure of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska (214 citations)
  • Upper-mantle seismic discontinuities and the thermal structure of subduction zones (183 citations)
  • Sharpness of upper-mantle discontinuities determined from high-frequency reflections (178 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Harley M. Benz focuses on Seismology, Induced seismicity, Geophysics, Aftershock and Crust. In most of his Seismology studies, his work intersects topics such as Geological survey. His Induced seismicity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Subduction and Submarine pipeline.

His work on Mantle as part of general Geophysics research is often related to Earth, thus linking different fields of science. His research integrates issues of Volcano, Magma chamber, Magma, Basin and Range Province and Triple junction in his study of Crust. His Basin and Range Province study incorporates themes from Lithosphere and Basin and range topography.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Seismology (79.71%)
  • Induced seismicity (31.16%)
  • Geophysics (16.67%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Seismology (79.71%)
  • Aftershock (14.49%)
  • Induced seismicity (31.16%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Harley M. Benz mostly deals with Seismology, Aftershock, Induced seismicity, Foreshock and Sequence. As part of his studies on Seismology, Harley M. Benz often connects relevant subjects like Magnitude. His Magnitude study combines topics in areas such as Event, Longitude, Latitude and Sequence.

He usually deals with Aftershock and limits it to topics linked to Intraplate earthquake and Subduction. Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Geophysics under Induced seismicity, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Epicenter. His research integrates issues of Fault and Earthquake hazard in his study of Hypocenter.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Oklahoma experiences largest earthquake during ongoing regional wastewater injection hazard mitigation efforts (108 citations)
  • Source modeling of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Nepal (Gorkha) earthquake sequence: Implications for geodynamics and earthquake hazards (26 citations)
  • Tectonic summaries of magnitude 7 and greater earthquakes from 2000 to 2015 (24 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Seismology
  • Optics
  • Plate tectonics

His primary areas of study are Seismology, Aftershock, Induced seismicity, Tectonics and Foreshock. His study in Seismology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Magnitude and Arc. He performs integrative study on Induced seismicity and Basement.

His research in Foreshock intersects with topics in Geodynamics, Intraplate earthquake and Subduction. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Fault and Earthquake hazard. His Interferometric synthetic aperture radar studies intersect with other disciplines such as Relocation and Geological survey.

Best Publications

  • Three‐dimensional P and S wave velocity structure of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska

    H. M. Benz;B. A. Chouet;P. B. Dawson;J. C. Lahr

  • Sharpness of upper-mantle discontinuities determined from high-frequency reflections

    H. M. Benz;J. E. Vidale

  • Upper-mantle seismic discontinuities and the thermal structure of subduction zones

    John E. Vidale;Harley M. Benz

  • Continuing megathrust earthquake potential in Chile after the 2014 Iquique earthquake

    Gavin P. Hayes;Matthew W. Herman;William D. Barnhart;Kevin P. Furlong

  • Monitoring the Earthquake source process in North America

    R. B. Herrmann;H. Benz;Charles James Ammon

  • Oklahoma experiences largest earthquake during ongoing regional wastewater injection hazard mitigation efforts

    William L. Yeck;Gavin P. Hayes;Daniel E. McNamara;Justin L. Rubinstein

  • Lithospheric structure of northern California from teleseismic images of the upper mantle

    H. M. Benz;G. Zandt;D. H. Oppenheimer

  • Imaging the crustal magma sources beneath Mauna Loa and Kilauea volcanoes, Hawaii

    Paul G. Okubo;Harley M. Benz;Bernard A. Chouet

  • Far-field pressurization likely caused one of the largest injection induced earthquakes by reactivating a large preexisting basement fault structure

    William L. Yeck;Matthew Weingarten;Harley M. Benz;Daniel E. McNamara

  • The 2001–Present Induced Earthquake Sequence in the Raton Basin of Northern New Mexico and Southern Colorado

    Justin L. Rubinstein;William L. Ellsworth;Arthur F. McGarr;Harley M. Benz

  • Earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms in central Oklahoma reveal a complex system of reactivated subsurface strike‐slip faulting

    Daniel E. McNamara;Harley M. Benz;Robert B. Herrmann;Eric A. Bergman

  • Regional Lg attenuation for the continental United States

    Harley M. Benz;Arthur Frankel;David M. Boore

  • Frequency-Dependent Lg Q within the Continental United States

    Dirk Erickson;Daniel E. McNamara;Harley M. Benz

  • On the Composition of Earth's Short-Period Seismic Noise Field

    Keith D. Koper;Kevin Seats;Harley Benz

  • Rapid Characterization of the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquake Sequence

    Unknown

  • Three‐dimensional velocity structure of the Kilauea Caldera, Hawaii

    P. B. Dawson;B. A. Chouet;P. G. Okubo;A. Villaseñor

  • Rapid Characterization of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake Sequence and Its Seismotectonic Context

    Gavin P. Hayes;Richard W. Briggs;William D. Barnhart;William L. Yeck

  • Seismotectonic framework of the 2010 February 27 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake sequence

    Gavin P. Hayes;Eric Bergman;Kendra L. Johnson;Kendra L. Johnson;Harley M. Benz

  • Time functions of deep earthquakes from broadband and short‐period stacks

    Heidi Houston;Harley M. Benz;John E. Vidale

  • A Method to Establish Seismic Noise Baselines for Automated Station Assessment

    D. E. McNamara;C.R. Hutt;L.S. Gee;Harley M. Benz

  • A sharp and flat section of the core-mantle boundary

    John E. Vidale;Harley M. Benz

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavin P. Hayes
Gavin P. Hayes United States Geological Survey
Kevin P. Furlong
Kevin P. Furlong Pennsylvania State University
Daniel E. McNamara
Daniel E. McNamara United States Geological Survey
Paul S. Earle
Paul S. Earle United States Geological Survey
Antonio Villaseñor
Antonio Villaseñor Spanish National Research Council
Robert B. Herrmann
Robert B. Herrmann Saint Louis University
Eric A. Bergman
Eric A. Bergman University of Colorado Boulder
Richard C. Aster
Richard C. Aster Colorado State University
David J. Wald
David J. Wald United States Geological Survey
John E. Vidale
John E. Vidale University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields that can be pursued through flexible online education. For seniors interested in continuing their learning journey, open university free courses for over 60s provide valuable opportunities to explore new subjects without financial barriers.

For those aiming to combine Earth Science knowledge with information management, pursuing a ala-accredited program offers specialized training in library and information science. A masters in library science can further deepen expertise, preparing graduates for careers in research libraries, archives, and data management related to environmental and geoscience data.

Meanwhile, creativity intersects with science through degrees like an online photography degree, which can complement Earth Science careers in fields such as environmental documentation, geospatial imaging, and scientific visualization.

These diverse pathways demonstrate the broad scope of opportunities for Earth Science students to expand their skills and career readiness through relevant online degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Harley M. Benz

Trending Scientists