World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta

Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
60
Citations
11100
World Ranking
2328
National Ranking
26

Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 209 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta is affiliated with Roma Tre University in Italy. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with 110 and 70 publications respectively. Within these domains, their research further delves into specialized subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecology, and Ecological Modeling.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad spectrum related to ecological and botanical studies. Key areas of focus include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Plant and Animal Studies, Mediterranean and Iberian Flora and Fauna, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Botany and Plant Ecology Studies, and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications.

Their recent scholarly contributions include several papers published in notable scientific journals. Some of these are:

  • Impact of invasive alien plants on native plant communities and Natura 2000 habitats: State of the art, gap analysis and perspectives in Italy, 2020, Journal of Environmental Management
  • sPlotOpen - An environmentally balanced, open-access, global dataset of vegetation plots, 2021, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Global relationships in tree functional traits, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Distance decay 2.0 - A global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities, 2022, Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Benchmarking plant diversity of Palaearctic grasslands and other open habitats, 2021, Journal of Vegetation Science

Their work appears frequently in a consistent set of publication venues, including:

  • Journal of Vegetation Science
  • Applied Vegetation Science
  • Vegetation Classification and Survey
  • Plant Sociology
  • Remote Sensing

Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta has collaborated extensively with several researchers, reflecting patterns of repeated co-authorship. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marta Carboni
  • Flavio Marzialetti
  • Gianmaria Bonari
  • Marta Gaia Sperandii
  • María Laura Carranza

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • European Red List of Habitats : Part 2. Terrestrial and freshwater habitats

    J. A. M. Janssen;J. S. Rodwell;M. Garcia Criado;S. Gubbay

  • Are there habitats that contribute best to plant species diversity in coastal dunes

    Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta;M. L. Carranza;Carmela Francesca Izzi

  • Morphological analysis of herbaceous communities under different grazing regimes

    S. Diaz;Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta;M. Cabido

  • Assessing conservation status on coastal dunes: a multiscale approach.

    Marta Carboni;M. L. Carranza;Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta

  • Coastal Vegetation Zonation and Dune Morphology in Some Mediterranean Ecosystems

    Alicia Acosta;Stefania Ercole;Angela Stanisci;Valério De Patta Pillar

  • What has happened to coastal dunes in the last half century? A multitemporal coastal landscape analysis in Central Italy

    Marco Malavasi;R. Santoro;Maurizio Cutini;Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta

  • Native woody vegetation in central Argentina: Classification of Chaco and Espinal forests

    Marcelo Cabido;Marcelo Cabido;Sebastián R. Zeballos;Sebastián R. Zeballos;Marcelo Zak;María L. Carranza

  • Environmental Factors Influencing Coastal Vegetation Pattern: New Insights from the Mediterranean Basin

    Giuseppe Fenu;Marta Carboni;Alicia T. R. Acosta;Gianluigi Bacchetta

  • Community structure in montane grasslands of central Argentina in relation to land use

    S Diaz;Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta;M. Cabido

  • Effects of Trampling Limitation on Coastal Dune Plant Communities

    Riccardo Santoro;Tommaso Jucker;Irene Prisco;Marta Carboni

  • Distance decay 2.0 – A global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities

    Unknown

  • Global relationships in tree functional traits

    Unknown

  • Marine litter in Mediterranean sandy littorals: Spatial distribution patterns along central Italy coastal dunes

    Gianluca Poeta;Corrado Battisti;Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta

  • Impact of invasive alien plants on native plant communities and Natura 2000 habitats: State of the art, gap analysis and perspectives in Italy.

    L. Lazzaro;R. Bolpagni;G. Buffa;R. Gentili

  • The impact of human pressure on landscape patterns and plant species richness in Mediterranean coastal dunes

    M. Malavasi;R. Santoro;M. Cutini;A.T.R. Acosta

  • Combining land cover mapping of coastal dunes with vegetation analysis

    Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta;M. L. Carranza;C. F. Izzi

  • sPlotOpen – An environmentally balanced, open-access, global dataset of vegetation plots

    Francesco Maria Sabatini;Jonathan Lenoir;Tarek Hattab;Elise Aimee Arnst

  • Beach litter occurrence in sandy littorals: The potential role of urban areas, rivers and beach users in central Italy

    Gianluca Poeta;Luisa Conti;Marco Malavasi;Corrado Battisti

  • Ecosystem classification for EU habitat distribution assessment in sandy coastal environments: an application in central Italy.

    Maria Laura Carranza;Alicia T. R. Acosta;Angela Stanisci;Gianfranco Pirone

  • Vegetation changes along a precipitation gradient in Central Argentina

    M. Cabido;C. Gonz;A. Acosta;S. Diaz

  • Are some communities of the coastal dune zonation more susceptible to alien plant invasion

    M. Carboni;R. Santoro;A. T. R. Acosta

  • Spatial connectivity and boundary patterns in coastal dune vegetation in the Circeo National Park, Central Italy

    Alicia Acosta;Carlo Blasi;Carlo Blasi;Angela Stanisci;Angela Stanisci

Frequent Co-Authors

Marta Carboni
Marta Carboni Roma Tre University
Maria Laura Carranza
Maria Laura Carranza University of Molise
Carlo Blasi
Carlo Blasi Sapienza University of Rome
Marcelo Cabido
Marcelo Cabido National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Carlo Ricotta
Carlo Ricotta Sapienza University of Rome
Sandra Díaz
Sandra Díaz National University of Córdoba
Corrado Battisti
Corrado Battisti Metropolitan City of Rome Capital
Tommaso Jucker
Tommaso Jucker University of Bristol
Alessandro Chiarucci
Alessandro Chiarucci University of Bologna
Milan Chytrý
Milan Chytrý Masaryk University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution often intersects with broader scientific and healthcare education. Many students look for flexible, accredited options, especially when considering further studies or career pivots. Advances in online education now allow learners to explore programs such as direct entry msn programs, which are ideal for those without a nursing background wishing to enter advanced practice fields.

Comparing institutions is crucial. Insights from resources like chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program can help you make informed choices about program quality and learning outcomes. Additionally, bridge programs such as the bsn to msn online offer affordable pathways for advancing your credentials while balancing other commitments.

It's also important to consider institutional credibility. Choosing from not for profit online colleges can ensure you receive a recognized and respected degree. Whether advancing in healthcare, environmental sciences, or research, these online learning options provide valuable, adaptable career pathways for students pursuing Ecology and Evolution in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta

Trending Scientists