World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 34 9461 9059 14 14 83 4339

Graciela Valladares publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Graciela Valladares between 1991 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Graciela Valladares published across 34 years, from 1991 to 2024, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2002. 4 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2002. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications
1991 2024

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Graciela Valladares: publications per year, 1991 to 2024
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 4
1998 2
1999 4
2000 0
2001 2
2002 7
2003 3
2004 1
2005 3
2006 5
2007 5
2008 4
2009 3
2010 3
2011 6
2012 3
2013 3
2014 2
2015 6
2016 5
2017 5
2018 2
2019 2
2020 5
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
2024 3
Total 97
Download as CSV

Graciela Valladares publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graciela Valladares sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 83 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 83
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Graciela Valladares D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graciela Valladares sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123 34
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Graciela Valladares is affiliated with the National University of Córdoba in Argentina. Their research spans several scientific fields, notably Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Social Sciences. Subfields of study include Genetics, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Gender Studies.

The main topics addressed in their research involve various aspects of insect and arachnid ecology and behavior, plant parasitism and resistance, plant and animal studies, and ecology and vegetation dynamics. Other areas covered include insect-plant interactions and control, feminism, gender, and social issues, as well as religion and society in Latin America.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • Forest cover and proximity decrease herbivory and increase crop yield via enhanced natural enemies in soybean fields (2020, Journal of Applied Ecology)
  • Edge effects on insect-plant food webs: assessing the influence of geographical orientation and microclimatic conditions (2020, Ecological Entomology)
  • Microclimatic edge effects in a fragmented forest: disentangling the drivers of ecological processes in plant-leafminer-parasitoid food webs (2021, Ecological Entomology)
  • Habitat area and edges affect the length of trophic chains in a fragmented forest (2023, Journal of Animal Ecology)
  • La indumentaria como voz de protesta. Los pañuelos verdes en la subversión del género, en el marco de la lucha por la legalización del aborto en Argentina (Buenos Aires, 2018 - 2020) (2024, Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación)

Graciela Valladares has co-authored several papers with the following researchers:

  • Adriana Salvo (3 collaborations)
  • María Laura Bernaschini (2 collaborations)
  • Ezequiel González (1 collaboration)
  • Douglas A. Landis (1 collaboration)
  • Michal Knapp (1 collaboration)

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Ecological Entomology (2 publications)
  • Journal of Applied Ecology (1 publication)
  • Journal of Animal Ecology (1 publication)
  • Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación (1 publication)

Their book publication record includes a recent title:

  • Atlas geoambiental de prevenção e combate a incêndios em Uruçuí, Piauí, Brasil published by IFPI eBooks (2024)

Best Publications

  • Habitat Fragmentation Effects on Trophic Processes of Insect-Plant Food Webs

    Graciela Valladares;Adriana Salvo;Luciano Cagnolo

  • Habitat fragmentation and species loss across three interacting trophic levels: effects of life-history and food-web traits.

    Luciano Cagnolo;Graciela Valladares;Adriana Salvo;Marcelo Cabido

  • Larvicide and oviposition deterrent effects of fruit and leaf extracts from Melia azedarach L. on Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae).

    C. Coria;W. Almiron;G. Valladares;C. Carpinella

  • Plant species richness in the Chaco Serrano Woodland from central Argentina : Ecological traits and habitat fragmentation effects

    Luciano Cagnolo;Marcelo Ruben Cabido;Graciela Rosa Valladares

  • Network topology: patterns and mechanisms in plant-herbivore and host-parasitoid food webs.

    Luciano Cagnolo;Adriana Salvo;Graciela Valladares

  • The influence of habitat structure on arthropod diversity in Argentine semi‐arid Chaco forest

    Sarah M. Gardner;Marcelo R. Cabido;Graciela R. Valladares;Sandra Diaz

  • Laboratory Evaluation of Melia azedarach (Meliaceae) Extracts Against the Elm Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

    G. Valladares;M. T. Defago;S. Palacios;M. C. Carpinella

  • Potent limonoid insect antifeedant from Melia azedarach.

    Cecilia Carpinella;Carlos Ferrayoli;Graciela Valladares;Maria Defago

  • Forest fragmentation leads to food web contraction

    Graciela Valladares;Luciano Cagnolo;Adriana Salvo

  • Diversity and guild structure of insect assemblages under grazing and exclusion regimes in a montane grassland from Central Argentina

    Luciano Cagnolo;Silvia Itatí Molina;Graciela Rosa Valladares

  • Intimacy and fidelity: internal and external feeding by the British microlepidoptera

    Kevin J. Gaston;Duncan Reavey;Graciela R. Valladares

  • Changes in feeding habit as caterpillars grow

    Kevin J. Gaston;Duncan Reavey;Graciela R. Valladares

  • Response of Epilachna paenulata to Two Flavonoids, Pinocembrin and Quercetin, in a Comparative Study

    Georgina N. Diaz Napal;Maria T. Defagó;Graciela R. Valladares;Sara M. Palacios

  • Insecticide and antifeedant activity of different plant parts of Melia azedarach on Xanthogaleruca luteola.

    M. Defagó;G. Valladares;E. Banchio;C. Carpinella

  • Understanding Synergistic Toxicity of Terpenes as Insecticides: Contribution of Metabolic Detoxification in Musca domestica.

    Esteban Scalerandi;Guillermo A. Flores;Marcela Palacio;Maria Teresa Defagó

  • Laboratory Evaluation of Artemisia annua L. Extract and Artemisinin Activity against Epilachna paenulata and Spodoptera eridania

    María E. Maggi;Arnaldo Mangeaud;María C. Carpinella;Carlos G. Ferrayoli

  • Effects of Melia azedarach on Triatoma infestans

    G.R Valladares;D Ferreyra;M.T Defago;M.C Carpinella

  • A Moveable Feast: Insects Moving at the Forest-Crop Interface Are Affected by Crop Phenology and the Amount of Forest in the Landscape.

    Ezequiel González;Adriana Salvo;María Teresa Defagó;Graciela Valladares

  • Effects of Melia azedarach, (Meliaceae) fruit extracts on the leafminer Liriomyza huidobrensis, (Diptera, Agromyzidae): Assessment in laboratory and field experiments

    E Banchio;G Valladares;M Defagó;S Palacios

  • A tritrophic analysis of host preference and performance in a polyphagous leafminer

    Martín Videla;Graciela Valladares;Adriana Salvo

  • The Invasive Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae): Understanding Its Pest Status and Management Globally.

    Phyllis G. Weintraub;Sonja J. Scheffer;Diedrich Visser;Graciela Rosa Valladares

  • Quantitative food webs of dipteran leafminers and their parasitoids in Argentina

    Graciela R. Valladares;Adriana Salvo;H. Charles J. Godfray

  • Arthropod communities and biological control in soybean fields: Forest cover at landscape scale is more influential than forest proximity

    Ezequiel González;Adriana Salvo;Graciela Valladares

  • Soybean crops may benefit from forest pollinators

    M. Monasterolo;M.L. Musicante;G.R Valladares;A. Salvo

  • Forest fragmentation reduces parasitism via species loss at multiple trophic levels.

    María Silvina Fenoglio;Diane Srivastava;Graciela Valladares;Luciano Cagnolo

  • Sharing enemies: evidence of forest contribution to natural enemy communities in crops, at different spatial scales

    Ezequiel González;Adriana Salvo;Graciela Valladares

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcelo Cabido
Marcelo Cabido National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston University of Exeter
Bing Chen
Bing Chen Chinese Academy of Sciences
Sandra Díaz
Sandra Díaz National University of Córdoba
H. Charles J. Godfray
H. Charles J. Godfray University of Oxford
Diane S. Srivastava
Diane S. Srivastava University of British Columbia
Douglas A. Landis
Douglas A. Landis Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. Many students find that complementing their studies with knowledge in sociology enhances their understanding of human-environment interactions. Exploring an online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into societal influences and promote more holistic environmental solutions.

For those interested in advancing their academic credentials while focusing on education or social sciences, there are flexible options that do not require traditional dissertation work. An edd without dissertation offers a practical route to doctoral study with emphasis on applied research, ideal for professionals seeking leadership roles.

Many educators and practitioners also consider transitioning from an Ed.S. to Ed.D. program online to deepen their expertise and expand career opportunities. Resources on the eds to edd programs online highlight options tailored for working professionals balancing study with career demands.

Lastly, for those who want to focus on social well-being within environmental contexts, an online dsw programs in social work provide an affordable, advanced degree path. This can lead to influential careers addressing environmental justice and community health.

Best Scientists Citing Graciela Valladares

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles