What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Biodiversity
His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Environmental resource management and Intraspecific competition.
His study in Plant community, Species diversity, Species richness, Niche and Functional diversity are all subfields of Ecology.
His research on Biodiversity frequently links to adjacent areas such as Temporal scales.
The Ecosystem study which covers Trophic level that intersects with Range, Taxon, Taxonomic rank and Invertebrate.
His Environmental resource management research includes themes of Land use, land-use change and forestry, Land use, Ecosystem services, Ecology and Functional ecology.
His Intraspecific competition research includes elements of Evolutionary biology and Environmental gradient, Habitat.
His most cited work include:
- Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments (988 citations)
- Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits (561 citations)
- Ecological assembly rules in plant communities--approaches, patterns and prospects. (520 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Francesco de Bello mainly investigates Ecology, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Species richness and Plant community.
Francesco de Bello integrates several fields in his works, including Ecology and Specific leaf area.
His Biodiversity study incorporates themes from Evolutionary biology, Limiting similarity, Community and Environmental resource management.
His study in Ecosystem is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Trophic level, Biomass, Intraspecific competition and Land use.
His research integrates issues of Null model and Introduced species in his study of Species richness.
The concepts of his Plant community study are interwoven with issues in Climate change and Abiotic component.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (121.99%)
- Biodiversity (48.13%)
- Ecosystem (34.85%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Ecology (121.99%)
- Evolutionary biology (15.77%)
- Biodiversity (48.13%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Francesco de Bello spends much of his time researching Ecology, Evolutionary biology, Biodiversity, Competition and Ecology.
The various areas that Francesco de Bello examines in his Ecology study include Trait based and Extinction.
His studies in Evolutionary biology integrate themes in fields like Adaptation, Functional diversity and Phenotypic plasticity.
His research links Plant community with Biodiversity.
His Competition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Biomass and Abiotic component.
The study incorporates disciplines such as r/K selection theory, Community and Functional ecology in addition to Ecology.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Synchrony matters more than species richness in plant community stability at a global scale. (9 citations)
- The neglected importance of floral traits in trait‐based plant community assembly (8 citations)
- The neglected importance of floral traits in trait‐based plant community assembly (8 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Biodiversity
His scientific interests lie mostly in Evolutionary biology, Biodiversity, Competition, Plant community and Functional diversity.
His Evolutionary biology research incorporates themes from Beta diversity and Atlantic forest.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Statistics, Relative species abundance, Quadrat and Population variability.
He has researched Competition in several fields, including Adaptation, Abiotic component and Phenotypic plasticity.
Ecology covers Francesco de Bello research in Plant community.
His studies in Ecology integrate themes in fields like Trait based and Reproductive success.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
