World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonio Amoroso

Antonio Amoroso

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
69
Citations
17670
World Ranking
7355
National Ranking
185

Antonio Amoroso publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Amoroso sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 433 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Antonio Amoroso D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Amoroso sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonio Amoroso is affiliated with the University of Turin in Italy and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Medicine as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Genetics, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Nephrology, and Surgery.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of subjects related to renal and immune system conditions, with emphasis on:

  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases

Recent notable publications by Antonio Amoroso include:

  • "The genetic architecture of membranous nephropathy and its potential to improve non-invasive diagnosis," 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • "Genome-wide association analyses define pathogenic signaling pathways and prioritize drug targets for IgA nephropathy," 2023, Nature Genetics
  • "Butyrate as a bioactive human milk protective component against food allergy," 2020, Allergy
  • "HLA and AB0 Polymorphisms May Influence SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Severity," 2020, Transplantation
  • "Incidence and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection on solid organ transplantation recipients: A nationwide population-based study," 2020, American Journal of Transplantation

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues such as Silvia Deaglio, Tiziana Vaisitti, Licia Peruzzi, Valeria Bracciamà, and Monica Sorbini.

Antonio Amoroso's work has been published multiple times in journals including Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Communications, HLA, and Transplantation. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation and bioRxiv are among the venues where they have appeared most often.

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for IgA nephropathy

    Ali G Gharavi;Krzysztof Kiryluk;Murim Choi;Yifu Li

  • Discovery of new risk loci for IgA nephropathy implicates genes involved in immunity against intestinal pathogens

    Krzysztof Kiryluk;Yifu Li;Francesco Scolari;Simone Sanna-Cherchi

  • IgA nephropathy, the most common cause of glomerulonephritis, is linked to 6q22-23.

    Ali G. Gharavi;Ali G. Gharavi;Yan Yan;Francesco Scolari;F. Paolo Schena

  • Geographic Differences in Genetic Susceptibility to IgA Nephropathy: GWAS Replication Study and Geospatial Risk Analysis

    Krzysztof Kiryluk;Yifu Li;Simone Sanna-Cherchi;Simone Sanna-Cherchi;Mersedeh Rohanizadegan

  • The rediscovery of uromodulin (Tamm–Horsfall protein): from tubulointerstitial nephropathy to chronic kidney disease

    Luca Rampoldi;Francesco Scolari;Antonio Amoroso;GianMarco Ghiggeri

  • A significant sex--but not elective cesarean section--effect on mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus infection

    A. Amoroso;F. Asensi-Botet;A. Pereda;V. Balossini

  • Involvement of HLA class I alleles in natural killer (NK) cell-specific functions: expression of HLA-Cw3 confers selective protection from lysis by alloreactive NK clones displaying a defined specificity (specificity 2).

    E Ciccone;D Pende;O Viale;A Than

  • Multicenter Study on Hepatitis C Virus–Related Cryoglobulinemic Glomerulonephritis

    Dario Roccatello;Alessandro Fornasieri;Osvaldo Giachino;Daniela Rossi

  • Allelism of MCKD, FJHN and GCKD caused by impairment of uromodulin export dynamics

    Luca Rampoldi;Gianluca Caridi;Daniela Santon;Francesca Boaretto

  • Extensively hydrolyzed casein formula containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reduces the occurrence of other allergic manifestations in children with cow's milk allergy: 3-year randomized controlled trial.

    Roberto Berni Canani;Margherita Di Costanzo;Giorgio Bedogni;Antonio Amoroso

  • Primary hyperoxaluria type 1: update and additional mutation analysis of the AGXT gene

    Emma L. Williams;Cecile Acquaviva;Antonio Amoroso;Francoise Chevalier

  • Neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes: relationship with antiphospholipid antibodies.

    Antonella Afeltra;Pierluigi Garzia;Anna Paola Mitterhofer;Marta Vadacca

  • A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human beta-defensin 1 gene is associated with HIV-1 infection in Italian children.

    Laura Braida;Michele Boniotto;Alessandra Pontillo;Pier Angelo Tovo

  • Microsomal autoantibodies in chronic infection with the HBsAg associated delta (delta) agent.

    O Crivelli;C Lavarini;E Chiaberge;A Amoroso

  • Antimicrobial and immunoregulatory functions of lactoferrin and its potential therapeutic application.

    Domenico Caccavo;Nelly M. Pellegrino;Maria Altamura;Amelia Rigon

  • Genetic Heterogeneity in Italian Families with IgA Nephropathy: Suggestive Linkage for Two Novel IgA Nephropathy Loci

    Luigi Bisceglia;Giuseppina Cerullo;Paola Forabosco;Diletta Domenica Torres

  • Physical and functional independency of p70 and p58 natural killer (NK) cell receptors for HLA class I: their role in the definition of different groups of alloreactive NK cell clones

    M Vitale;S Sivori;D Pende;R Augugliaro

  • The genetic architecture of membranous nephropathy and its potential to improve non-invasive diagnosis

    Jingyuan Xie;Lili Liu;Nikol Mladkova;Yifu Li

  • Uromodulin storage diseases: Clinical aspects and mechanisms

    Francesco Scolari;Gianluca Caridi;Luca Rampoldi;Regina Tardanico

  • Human mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles modulate T cell response to islet antigen glutamic acid decarboxylase in patients with type 1 diabetes

    Enrica Favaro;Andrea Carpanetto;Sara Lamorte;Alberto Fusco

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonella Afeltra
Antonella Afeltra Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
Sergio Crovella
Sergio Crovella Qatar University
Gian Marco Ghiggeri
Gian Marco Ghiggeri Istituto Giannina Gaslini
Silvia Deaglio
Silvia Deaglio University of Turin
Francesco Paolo Schena
Francesco Paolo Schena University of Bari Aldo Moro
Ali G. Gharavi
Ali G. Gharavi Columbia University
Giorgio Casari
Giorgio Casari Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Loreto Gesualdo
Loreto Gesualdo University of Bari Aldo Moro
Markus Perola
Markus Perola Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Mario Rizzetto
Mario Rizzetto University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a wide range of career paths, including several that can be pursued completely online. Many students transition into allied health careers, such as health information management schools online. These programs prepare graduates to oversee medical records, analyze patient data, and ensure compliance with health regulations.

Another popular path is medical coding, which is essential for accurate medical billing and insurance processes. Understanding the difference between medical coding certification options is important for choosing the right credential. Salaries in this field can be competitive, and you can explore earning potential by checking medical coding jobs salary resources.

With the rapid adoption of electronic health records, the demand for skilled coders continues, but many wonder, is medical coding a dying career? Staying updated with certifications and technology skills helps keep these roles relevant and in-demand. Whether you pursue clinical research, coding, or health management, a strong foundation in Biology and Biochemistry supports long-term success.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Amoroso

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles