World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roberto Biassoni

Roberto Biassoni

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 66 2349 2149 56 53 193 23558

Roberto Biassoni publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roberto Biassoni between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roberto Biassoni published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2001. 4 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2001. 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1982 2025

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roberto Biassoni: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 3
1983 2
1984 0
1985 4
1986 2
1987 4
1988 2
1989 5
1990 2
1991 3
1992 3
1993 4
1994 6
1995 4
1996 11
1997 12
1998 6
1999 11
2000 12
2001 15
2002 9
2003 11
2004 3
2005 5
2006 1
2007 4
2008 1
2009 6
2010 6
2011 6
2012 7
2013 2
2014 4
2015 2
2016 3
2017 2
2018 3
2019 2
2020 6
2021 2
2022 0
2023 5
2024 1
2025 3
Total 205
Download as CSV

Roberto Biassoni publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Biassoni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 185–194 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 193 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190 193
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Roberto Biassoni D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Biassoni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124 66
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Roberto Biassoni is affiliated with the Istituto Giannina Gaslini in Italy. Their research career is focused primarily on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to related subfields including Molecular Biology, Surgery, Physiology, Genetics, and Infectious Diseases.

Their work encompasses various topics, with particular attention to:

  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
  • Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
  • Oral health in cancer treatment

Roberto Biassoni has coauthored several papers in collaboration with colleagues such as Margherita Squillario, Eddi Di Marco, Carola Bonaretti, Gianluca Piccolo, and Nicola Minuto. Notably, these collaborations have resulted in multiple publications across a range of scientific journals.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Microorganisms
  • Pediatric Surgery International
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Roberto Biassoni include:

  • "Gut Microbiota in T1DM-Onset Pediatric Patients: Machine-Learning Algorithms to Classify Microorganisms as Disease Linked" (2020), published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • "Pathways and microbiome modifications related to surgery and enterocolitis in Hirschsprung disease" (2021), Pediatric Surgery International
  • "Gut-microbiota in children and adolescents with obesity: inferred functional analysis and machine-learning algorithms to classify microorganisms" (2023), Scientific Reports

In addition to journal articles, Roberto Biassoni has contributed to book publications. One notable example is a title published by Humana Press: "Quantitative real-time PCR: methods and protocols" (2020).

Best Publications

  • Activating receptors and coreceptors involved in human natural killer cell-mediated cytolysis.

    Alessandro Moretta;Cristina Bottino;Massimo Vitale;Daniela Pende

  • RECEPTORS FOR HLA CLASS-I MOLECULES IN HUMAN NATURAL KILLER CELLS

    Alessandro Moretta;Cristina Bottino;Massimo Vitale;Daniela Pende

  • Identification and Molecular Characterization of Nkp30, a Novel Triggering Receptor Involved in Natural Cytotoxicity Mediated by Human Natural Killer Cells

    Daniela Pende;Silvia Parolini;Anna Pessino;Simona Sivori

  • Transforming growth factor β1 inhibits expression of NKp30 and NKG2D receptors: Consequences for the NK-mediated killing of dendritic cells

    Roberta Castriconi;Claudia Cantoni;Mariella Della Chiesa;Massimo Vitale

  • Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I-related Chain A and UL16-Binding Protein Expression on Tumor Cell Lines of Different Histotypes Analysis of Tumor Susceptibility to NKG2D-dependent Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity

    Daniela Pende;Paola Rivera;Stefania Marcenaro;Chien Chung Chang

  • Molecular cloning of NKp46: a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily involved in triggering of natural cytotoxicity.

    Anna Pessino;Simona Sivori;Cristina Bottino;Angela Malaspina

  • Molecular clones of the p58 NK cell receptor reveal immunoglobulin-related molecules with diversity in both the extra- and intracellular domains

    Nicolai Wagtmann;Roberto Biassoni;Claudia Cantoni;Simonetta Verdiani

  • X-Linked Lymphoproliferative Disease 2b4 Molecules Displaying Inhibitory Rather than Activating Function Are Responsible for the Inability of Natural Killer Cells to Kill Epstein-Barr Virus–Infected Cells

    Silvia Parolini;Cristina Bottino;Michela Falco;Raffaella Augugliaro

  • NKp46 is the major triggering receptor involved in the natural cytotoxicity of fresh or cultured human NK cells. Correlation between surface density of NKp46 and natural cytotoxicity against autologous, allogeneic or xenogeneic target cells

    Simona Sivori;Daniela Pende;Cristina Bottino;Emanuela Marcenaro

  • NKp44, a triggering receptor involved in tumor cell lysis by activated human natural killer cells, is a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily.

    Claudia Cantoni;Cristina Bottino;Massimo Vitale;Anna Pessino

  • The natural killer cell receptor specific for HLA-A allotypes: a novel member of the p58/p70 family of inhibitory receptors that is characterized by three immunoglobulin-like domains and is expressed as a 140-kD disulphide-linked dimer.

    D Pende;R Biassoni;C Cantoni;S Verdiani

  • The human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-C-specific "activatory" or "inhibitory" natural killer cell receptors display highly homologous extracellular domains but differ in their transmembrane and intracytoplasmic portions.

    Roberto Biassoni;Claudia Cantoni;Michela Falco;Simonetta Verdiani

  • What is a natural killer cell

    Alessandro Moretta;Cristina Bottino;Maria Cristina Mingari;Roberto Biassoni

  • Natural cytotoxicity receptors that trigger human NK-cell-mediated cytolysis.

    Alessandro Moretta;R. Biassoni;Cristina Bottino;Maria Cristina Mingari

  • Gntb-A, a Novel Sh2d1a-Associated Surface Molecule Contributing to the Inability of Natural Killer Cells to Kill Epstein-Barr Virus–Infected B Cells in X-Linked Lymphoproliferative Disease

    Cristina Bottino;Michela Falco;Silvia Parolini;Emanuela Marcenaro

  • Role of NKG2D in tumor cell lysis mediated by human NK cells: cooperation with natural cytotoxicity receptors and capability of recognizing tumors of nonepithelial origin.

    Daniela Pende;Claudia Cantoni;Claudia Cantoni;Paola Rivera;Massimo Vitale

  • Inhibitory receptors sensing HLA-G1 molecules in pregnancy: Decidua-associated natural killer cells express LIR-1 and CD94/NKG2A and acquire p49, an HLA-G1-specific receptor

    Marco Ponte;Claudia Cantoni;Roberto Biassoni;Andrea Tradori-Cappai

  • Human and mouse killer-cell inhibitory receptors recruit PTP1C and PTP1D protein tyrosine phosphatases.

    Lucia Olcese;Paul Lang;Frédéric Vély;Anna Cambiaggi;Anna Cambiaggi

  • Human natural killer cell receptors and co‐receptors

    Roberto Biassoni;Claudia Cantoni;Claudia Cantoni;Daniela Pende;Simona Sivori;Simona Sivori

  • NCRs and DNAM-1 mediate NK cell recognition and lysis of human and mouse melanoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo

    Tadepally Lakshmikanth;Shannon Burke;Talib Hassan Ali;Silvia Kimpfler

  • Major histocompatibility complex class I‐specific receptors on human natural killer and T lymphocytes

    Alessandro Moretta;Roberto Biassoni;Cristina Bottino;Daniela Pende

Frequent Co-Authors

Lorenzo Moretta
Lorenzo Moretta Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital
Alessandro Moretta
Alessandro Moretta University of Genoa
Cristina Bottino
Cristina Bottino University of Genoa
Claudia Cantoni
Claudia Cantoni University of Genoa
Maria Cristina Mingari
Maria Cristina Mingari University of Genoa
Daniela Pende
Daniela Pende University of Genoa
Michela Falco
Michela Falco Istituto Giannina Gaslini
Massimo Vitale
Massimo Vitale University of Genoa
Silvano Ferrini
Silvano Ferrini University of Genoa
Simona Sivori
Simona Sivori University of Genoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Microbiology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students look for programs that balance quality with accessibility, making the fastest and easiest online mph programs a popular choice for advancing public health knowledge without extensive barriers.

Certification is also a critical step in several specialized fields. For example, becoming a certified child life specialist requires targeted training and credentials, and understanding the process through resources about ccls certification can help aspiring professionals get started on the right path.

Additionally, many educational institutions now offer inclusive opportunities, with programs designed for a broad range of students. If you have a unique background, investigating the best associate degrees for felons may reveal options to pursue higher education and enhance career prospects despite challenges.

For those interested in healthcare integration, pursuing a role such as a functional medicine nurse practitioner is becoming increasingly relevant. Learning how to enter this field through guides like functional medicine np can provide a clear roadmap to combining medical knowledge with holistic care practices.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Biassoni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles