World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5768 5362 3123 2832 159 6587

Keith J. Horvath publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith J. Horvath between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith J. Horvath published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2021. 13 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2021. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2002 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith J. Horvath: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 5
2008 7
2009 5
2010 7
2011 3
2012 16
2013 8
2014 7
2015 14
2016 7
2017 13
2018 11
2019 16
2020 16
2021 24
2022 6
2023 5
2024 5
2025 8
Total 191
Download as CSV

Keith J. Horvath publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith J. Horvath sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 159
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith J. Horvath D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith J. Horvath sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Keith J. Horvath is a researcher affiliated with San Diego State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics, and Social Psychology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Sex work and related issues

Horvath has published extensively in various venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • mHealth
  • JCO Oncology Practice

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Horvath include:

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Combination Behavioral Interventions Co-Targeting Psychosocial Syndemics and HIV-Related Health Behaviors for Sexual Minority Men, 2020, The Journal of Sex Research
  • Double Jeopardy: Methamphetamine Use and HIV as Risk Factors for COVID-19, 2020, AIDS and Behavior
  • Engaging youth in mHealth: what works and how can we be sure?, 2021, mHealth
  • Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Progress in Preclinical Models and Prospects for Clinical Translation, 2022, Transplant International
  • Widespread closure of HIV prevention and care services places youth at higher risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, PLoS ONE

Horvath frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Lisa Hightow-Weidman
  • José A. Bauermeister
  • Patrick S. Sullivan
  • Rob Stephenson
  • Adam W. Carrico

Best Publications

  • Conducting Internet-based HIV/STD prevention survey research: considerations in design and evaluation.

    Willo Pequegnat;Æ B. R. Simon Rosser;Anne M. Bowen;Sheana S. Bull

  • A randomized control trial of Internet-delivered HIV prevention targeting rural MSM

    Anne M. Bowen;Keith J Horvath;Mark L. Williams

  • Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online peer-to-peer social support ART adherence intervention.

    Keith J. Horvath;J. Michael Oakes;B. R. Simon Rosser;Gene Danilenko

  • A comparison of mental health, substance use, and sexual risk behaviors between rural and non-rural transgender persons.

    Keith J Horvath;Alex Iantaffi;Rebecca Swinburne-Romine;Walter Bockting

  • The social/sexual environment of gay men residing in a rural frontier state: implications for the development of HIV prevention programs.

    Mark L. Williams;Anne M. Bowen;Keith J. Horvath

  • HIV sexual risk behavior by men who use the internet to seek sex with men: results of the men's INTernet sex study-II (MINTS-II)

    B. R. Simon Rosser;J. Michael Oakes;Keith J. Horvath;Joseph A. Konstan

  • Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men.

    Keith J. Horvath;B.R. Simon Rosser;Gary Remafedi

  • Reducing HIV risk behavior of men who have sex with men through persuasive computing: Results of the Men's INTernet Study-II

    BR Simon Rosser;J Michael Oakes;Joseph Konstan;Simon Hooper

  • Acceptability and Preliminary Efficacy of a Tailored Online HIV/STI Testing Intervention for Young Men who have Sex with Men: The Get Connected! Program

    José A. Bauermeister;Emily S. Pingel;Laura Jadwin-Cakmak;Gary W. Harper

  • Virtual and physical venues as contexts for HIV risk among rural men who have sex with men.

    Keith J. Horvath;Anne M. Bowen;Mark L. Williams

  • Real-Time Mobile Detection of Drug Use with Wearable Biosensors: A Pilot Study

    Stephanie Carreiro;David A. Smelson;Megan Ranney;Keith J. Horvath

  • Recent mobile health interventions to support medication adherence among HIV-positive MSM

    Kathryn Elizabeth Muessig;Sara LeGrand;Keith J. Horvath;José A. Bauermeister

  • The future of internet-based HIV prevention: A report on key findings from the Men's INTernet (MINTS-I,II) sex studies

    B. R. Simon Rosser;J. Michael Wilkerson;Derek J. Smolenski;J. Michael Oakes

  • Empowering With PrEP (E-PrEP), a Peer-Led Social Media–Based Intervention to Facilitate HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Adoption Among Young Black and Latinx Gay and Bisexual Men: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

    Viraj V Patel;Zoë Ginsburg;Sarit A Golub;Keith J Horvath

  • Compulsive Sexual Behavior and Risk for Unsafe Sex Among Internet Using Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Eli Coleman;Keith J. Horvath;Michael Miner;Michael W. Ross

  • Young children’s talk about learning events

    Karen Bartsch;Keith Horvath;David Estes

  • Using the Internet to Recruit Rural MSM for HIV Risk Assessment: Sampling Issues

    Anne Bowen;Mark Williams;Keith Horvath

  • An Online Needs Assessment of a Virtual Community: What Men Who Use the Internet to Seek Sex with Men Want in Internet-Based HIV Prevention

    Simon Hooper;B. R. Simon Rosser;Keith J. Horvath;J. Michael Oakes

  • Toxicity of methylsulfonylmethane in rats

    K Horváth;P.E Noker;S Somfai-Relle;R Glávits

  • Predictors of HIV disclosure to secondary partners and sexual risk behavior among a high-risk sample of HIV-positive MSM: results from six epicenters in the US

    B R Simon Rosser;K J Horvath;L A Hatfield;J L Peterson

Frequent Co-Authors

B. R. Simon Rosser
B. R. Simon Rosser University of Minnesota
Darin J. Erickson
Darin J. Erickson University of Minnesota
Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman
Lisa B. Hightow-Weidman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
José A. Bauermeister
José A. Bauermeister University of Pennsylvania
Derek J. Smolenski
Derek J. Smolenski Defense Health Agency
J. Michael Oakes
J. Michael Oakes University of Minnesota
Mark L. Williams
Mark L. Williams Florida International University
Rob Stephenson
Rob Stephenson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
K. Rivet Amico
K. Rivet Amico University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Traci L. Toomey
Traci L. Toomey University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens many doors, especially in the field of mental health counseling. The path to becoming a certified mental health counselor involves specific education and licensure requirements, which can vary by state and city. For example, those interested in practicing in Nevada should familiarize themselves with Reno mental health counselor certification requirements to understand local expectations and processes.

Similarly, potential counselors should explore the Richmond mental health counselor education requirements in Virginia, which detail degree levels, supervised experience, and examination needs. In California, both mental health counselor requirements in Riverside and Sacramento mental health counselor certification requirements highlight local regulations, licensing steps, and typical paths for online degree graduates.

Online psychology degrees make it accessible to gain foundational knowledge and meet prerequisites for these diverse career pathways. As certification requirements vary, prospective students should research their target location and program to ensure a smooth transition from online study to professional practice.

Best Scientists Citing Keith J. Horvath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles