World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 81 1405 1254 843 735 328 21271

Matthew J. Mimiaga publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew J. Mimiaga between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew J. Mimiaga published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 19 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2021. 39 of the 417 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2021. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 27 publications
2004 2025

417 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew J. Mimiaga: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 4
2007 2
2008 12
2009 21
2010 23
2011 18
2012 16
2013 8
2014 30
2015 27
2016 32
2017 28
2018 30
2019 33
2020 23
2021 38
2022 21
2023 9
2024 12
2025 27
Total 417
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Mimiaga publications per year - data summary

  • Matthew J. Mimiaga, a Psychology scholar from University of California, Los Angeles, has 417 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 38 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2005, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 19.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 19.0 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 107 publications, 26% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 83 publications (10.4 per year); 2012-2019: 204 publications (25.5 per year); 2020-2025: 130 publications (21.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Matthew J. Mimiaga publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Mimiaga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 328 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 328
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Mimiaga publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Matthew J. Mimiaga, a Psychology scholar from University of California, Los Angeles, records 328 publications - the 90th percentile of the discipline.
  • 90% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Matthew J. Mimiaga, and about 10% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Matthew J. Mimiaga ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Matthew J. Mimiaga D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Mimiaga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 81
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Mimiaga D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Matthew J. Mimiaga, a Psychology scholar from University of California, Los Angeles, records 81 D-Index - the 88th percentile of the discipline.
  • 88% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Matthew J. Mimiaga, and about 12% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Matthew J. Mimiaga ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Matthew J. Mimiaga is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on subfields including Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics, notably:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • HIV Research and Treatment

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • UNC Libraries
  • JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
  • AIDS Patient Care and STDs
  • AIDS

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Health Is on the Back Burner:" Multilevel Barriers and Facilitators to Primary Care Among People Who Inject Drugs (2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine)
  • The persistent and evolving HIV epidemic in American men who have sex with men (2021, The Lancet)
  • Signature changes in gut microbiome are associated with increased susceptibility to HIV-1 infection in MSM (2021, Microbiome)
  • Negative Transgender-Related Media Messages Are Associated with Adverse Mental Health Outcomes in a Multistate Study of Transgender Adults (2020, LGBT Health)
  • Legal gender marker and name change is associated with lower negative emotional response to gender-based mistreatment and improve mental health outcomes among trans populations (2020, SSM - Population Health)

The scientist collaborates frequently with a group of coauthors, including:

  • Katie B. Biello
  • Kenneth H. Mayer
  • Steven A. Safren
  • Sari L. Reisner
  • Patrick S. Sullivan

This body of work demonstrates a consistent engagement with public health concerns related to HIV/AIDS, drug use, sexual risk behaviors, and LGBTQ health issues, utilizing multidisciplinary approaches across medical and social sciences.

Best Publications

  • Depression and Diabetes Treatment Nonadherence: A Meta-Analysis

    Jeffrey S. Gonzalez;Mark Peyrot;Mark Peyrot;Lauren McCarl;Erin Marie Collins

  • A population-based study of sexual orientation identity and gender differences in adult health.

    Kerith J. Conron;Matthew J. Mimiaga;Stewart J. Landers

  • Mental health of transgender youth in care at an adolescent urban community health center: A matched retrospective cohort study.

    Sari L. Reisner;Sari L. Reisner;Ralph Vetters;M. Leclerc;Shayne Zaslow

  • Strategies used by people who inject drugs to avoid stigma in healthcare settings.

    Dea L. Biancarelli;Katie B. Biello;Katie B. Biello;Ellen Childs;M. Drainoni

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Relaxation With Educational Support for Medication-Treated Adults With ADHD and Persistent Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Steven A. Safren;Susan Sprich;Matthew J. Mimiaga;Craig Surman

  • Defining the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis care continuum.

    Amy S. Nunn;Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein;Catherine E. Oldenburg;Kenneth H. Mayer

  • Preexposure antiretroviral prophylaxis attitudes in high-risk Boston area men who report having sex with men: limited knowledge and experience but potential for increased utilization after education.

    Matthew J. Mimiaga;Patricia Case;Patricia Case;Carey V. Johnson;Steven A. Safren;Steven A. Safren

  • Childhood sexual abuse is highly associated with HIV risk-taking behavior and infection among MSM in the EXPLORE Study.

    Matthew J Mimiaga;Elizabeth Noonan;Deborah Donnell;Steven A Safren;Steven A Safren

  • A review of HIV antiretroviral adherence and intervention studies among HIV-infected youth.

    Sari L Reisner;Matthew J Mimiaga;Margie Skeer;Brandon Perkovich

  • Limited Awareness and Low Immediate Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Men Who Have Sex with Men Using an Internet Social Networking Site

    Douglas S. Krakower;Matthew James Mimiaga;Joshua G. Rosenberger;David S. Novak

  • Substance use among HIV-infected patients engaged in primary care in the United States: findings from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems cohort.

    Matthew J. Mimiaga;Sari L. Reisner;Chris Grasso;Heidi M. Crane

  • Transgender Health Disparities: Comparing Full Cohort and Nested Matched-Pair Study Designs in a Community Health Center.

    Sari L. Reisner;Jaclyn M. White;Judith B. Bradford;Matthew J. Mimiaga

  • Retention in care outcomes for HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis implementation programmes among men who have sex with men in three US cities

    Phillip A Chan;Leandro Mena;Rupa Patel;Catherine E Oldenburg

  • The effect of psychosocial syndemic production on 4-year HIV incidence and risk behavior in a large cohort of sexually active men who have sex with men.

    Matthew J. Mimiaga;Conall OʼCleirigh;Katie B. Biello;Angela M. Robertson

  • Men who have sex with men: perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication.

    Matthew J Mimiaga;Hilary Goldhammer;Candice Belanoff;Ashley M Tetu

  • Mental health and HIV risk in men who have sex with men.

    Steven A Safren;Sari L Reisner;Sari L Reisner;Amy Lalh Herrick;Matthew J Mimiaga;Matthew J Mimiaga

  • Nonadherence to medical appointments is associated with increased plasma HIV RNA and decreased CD4 cell counts in a community-based HIV primary care clinic

    M. B. Berg;Steven A. Safren;M. J. Mimiaga;C. Grasso

  • State-level structural sexual stigma and HIV prevention in a national online sample of HIV-uninfected MSM in the United States.

    Catherine E. Oldenburg;Amaya G. Perez-Brumer;Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;Douglas Krakower

  • A Mixed Methods Study of the Sexual Health Needs of New England Transmen Who Have Sex with Nontransgender Men

    Sari L. Reisner;Brandon Perkovich;Brandon Perkovich;Matthew J. Mimiaga;Matthew J. Mimiaga

  • Prospective Associations Between HIV-Related Stigma, Transmission Risk Behaviors, and Adverse Mental Health Outcomes in Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;Conall O’Cleirigh;Conall O’Cleirigh;Kenneth H. Mayer;Kenneth H. Mayer;Matthew J. Mimiaga;Matthew J. Mimiaga

  • Clinically Significant Depressive Symptoms as a Risk Factor for HIV Infection Among Black MSM in Massachusetts

    Sari L. Reisner;Matthew J. Mimiaga;Matthew J. Mimiaga;Margie Skeer;Margie Skeer;Donna Bright

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth H. Mayer
Kenneth H. Mayer Harvard Medical School
Steven A. Safren
Steven A. Safren University of Miami
Katie B. Biello
Katie B. Biello Brown University
Sari L. Reisner
Sari L. Reisner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert Garofalo
Robert Garofalo Northwestern University
Conall O’Cleirigh
Conall O’Cleirigh Harvard University
Lisa M. Kuhns
Lisa M. Kuhns Northwestern University
Jaclyn M. White Hughto
Jaclyn M. White Hughto Brown University
Margie Skeer
Margie Skeer Tufts University
Patrick S. Sullivan
Patrick S. Sullivan Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA can open doors to a wide range of fulfilling careers. One increasingly in-demand career is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which typically requires at least a graduate degree in psychology or a related field. With the flexibility of online degree programs, it is now more accessible than ever to gain the credentials needed for this rewarding work.

Those interested in a career as a BCBA can explore specific requirements for different cities and regions. For instance, if you’re interested in becoming a bcba in Kansas City, it’s important to be aware of local licensing and continuing education expectations. Similarly, there are unique steps for becoming a bcba in Laredo and understanding the Las Vegas bcba requirements can also help you plan your educational journey.

If you’re considering different regions, learning more about bcba certification requirements in Lexington may inform your pathway. No matter where you plan to practice, online psychology degrees can provide the flexibility and accredited coursework required to launch your career in behavior analysis or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Mimiaga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles