World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
8058
World Ranking
3660
National Ranking
1751

John A. Schneider publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Schneider sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 317 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John A. Schneider D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Schneider sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Schneider is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on epidemiology, infectious diseases, general health professions, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

Their research concentrates strongly on topics related to HIV/AIDS research and interventions, HIV, drug use and sexual risk, LGBTQ health, identity and policy, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, homelessness and social issues, opioid use disorder treatment, and substance abuse treatment and outcomes.

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • COVID-19 During the Opioid Epidemic - Exacerbation of Stigma and Vulnerabilities, 2020, The Journal of Rural Health
  • Stigmatize the use, not the user? Attitudes on opioid use, drug injection, treatment, and overdose prevention in rural communities, 2020, Social Science & Medicine
  • The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Drug Use Behaviors, Fentanyl Exposure, and Harm Reduction Service Support among People Who Use Drugs in Rural Settings, 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • PrEP Care Continuum Engagement Among Persons Who Inject Drugs: Rural and Urban Differences in Stigma and Social Infrastructure, 2021, AIDS and Behavior
  • #PrEP4Love: success and stigma following release of the first sex-positive PrEP public health campaign, 2020, Culture Health & Sexuality

John A. Schneider has collaborated frequently with several researchers including Dustin T. Duncan, Harold A. Pollack, Bruce G. Taylor, Kayo Fujimoto, and Anna Hotton.

They have published prolifically in venues such as:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • AIDS
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their scholarly output includes 350 publications mainly in medicine, with significant contributions in epidemiology (133 publications), infectious diseases (118), general health professions (83), social psychology (58), and sociology and political science (43).

Best Publications

  • Better Physician-Patient Relationships Are Associated with Higher Reported Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Patients with HIV Infection

    John Schneider;Sherrie H. Kaplan;Sheldon Greenfield;Wenjun Li

  • Network Mixing and Network Influences Most Linked to HIV Infection and Risk Behavior in the HIV Epidemic Among Black Men Who Have Sex With Men

    John A Schneider;Benjamin Cornwell;David Ostrow;Stuart Michaels

  • Hydration status and physiological workload of UAE construction workers: A prospective longitudinal observational study

    Graham P Bates;John Schneider

  • Use of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Young Men Who Have Sex with Men is Associated with Race, Sexual Risk Behavior and Peer Network Size

    Lisa M. Kuhns;Lisa M. Kuhns;Anna L. Hotton;John Schneider;Robert Garofalo;Robert Garofalo

  • Implementation Research Methodologies for Achieving Scientific Equity and Health Equity

    Moira McNulty;J D Smith;Juan Villamar;Inger Burnett-Zeigler

  • PrEP Chicago: A randomized controlled peer change agent intervention to promote the adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among young Black men who have sex with men:

    Lindsay E Young;Phil Schumm;Leigh Alon;Alida Bouris

  • Development of a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Shared Decision making Among African-American LGBT Patients and their Clinicians.

    Monica E. Peek;Fanny Y. Lopez;H. Sharif Williams;Lucy J. Xu

  • Endovascular management of internal carotid artery injuries secondary to endonasal surgery: case series and review of the literature.

    Peter T. Sylvester;Christopher J. Moran;Colin P. Derdeyn;DeWitte T. Cross

  • Stigmatize the use, not the user? Attitudes on opioid use, drug injection, treatment, and overdose prevention in rural communities.

    Jerel M. Ezell;Suzan Walters;Samuel R. Friedman;Rebecca Bolinski

  • COVID-19 During the Opioid Epidemic - Exacerbation of Stigma and Vulnerabilities.

    Wiley D. Jenkins;Rebecca Bolinski;John Bresett;Brent Van Ham

  • An Index of Multiple Psychosocial, Syndemic Conditions Is Associated with Antiretroviral Medication Adherence Among HIV-Positive Youth.

    Lisa M. Kuhns;Anna L. Hotton;Rob Garofalo;Abigail L. Muldoon

  • Preexposure Prophylaxis Awareness and Use in a Population-Based Sample of Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men

    Aditya S. Khanna;Stuart Michaels;Britt Skaathun;Ethan Morgan

  • Preexposure Prophylaxis Initiation and Retention in Care Over 5 Years, 2012-2017: Are Quarterly Visits Too Much?

    Laura K Rusie;Carlos Orengo;Diane Burrell;Arthi Ramachandran

  • Preexposure prophylaxis guidelines have low sensitivity for identifying seroconverters in a sample of young Black MSM in Chicago.

    Nicola Lancki;Ellen Almirol;Leigh Alon;Moira McNulty

  • A network intervention that locates and intervenes with recently HIV-infected persons: The Transmission Reduction Intervention Project (TRIP).

    Georgios K. Nikolopoulos;Georgios K. Nikolopoulos;Eirini Pavlitina;Stephen Q. Muth;John Schneider

  • A new HIV prevention network approach: sociometric peer change agent selection.

    John A. Schneider;A. Ning Zhou;Edward O. Laumann

  • Family network proportion and HIV risk among Black men who have sex with men

    John Schneider;Stuart Michaels;Alida Bouris

  • #PrEP4Love: An Evaluation of a Sex-Positive HIV Prevention Campaign.

    Jessica M Dehlin;Ryan Stillwagon;Jim Pickett;Lance Keene

  • Marijuana Use as a Sex-Drug is Associated with HIV Risk Among Black MSM and Their Network

    Ethan Morgan;Britt Skaathun;Stuart Michaels;Lindsay Young

  • The Social Context of HIV Prevention and Care among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in Three U.S. Cities: The Neighborhoods and Networks (N2) Cohort Study.

    Dustin T. Duncan;DeMarc A. Hickson;William C. Goedel;Denton Callander

  • Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Immunizations among Mothers in a Traditional City in the United Arab Emirates

    Roos M. Bernsen;Fatmah R. Al-Zahmi;Noura A. Al-Ali;Rowayah O. Hamoudi

  • Socially-integrated transdisciplinary HIV prevention.

    Samuel R. Friedman;Martin J. Downing;Pavlo Smyrnov;Pavlo Smyrnov;Georgios Nikolopoulos;Georgios Nikolopoulos

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa M. Kuhns
Lisa M. Kuhns Northwestern University
Dustin T. Duncan
Dustin T. Duncan Columbia University
Samuel R. Friedman
Samuel R. Friedman National Development and Research Institutes
Dexter R. Voisin
Dexter R. Voisin Case Western Reserve University
Dimitrios Paraskevis
Dimitrios Paraskevis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Edward O. Laumann
Edward O. Laumann University of Chicago
Kenneth H. Mayer
Kenneth H. Mayer Harvard Medical School
Angelos Hatzakis
Angelos Hatzakis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Robert Garofalo
Robert Garofalo Northwestern University
Namratha R. Kandula
Namratha R. Kandula Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a range of rewarding and flexible career pathways. Popular options include psychology, social work, and behavior analysis—fields that remain in high demand across the USA.

For those interested in social work, the cheapest online msw programs make it easier to pursue this impactful profession without a high financial burden. Individuals aiming for quick career advancement may want to consider one year msw programs for an accelerated path to licensure and employment.

Aspiring behavior analysts can take advantage of bcba certification online, enabling graduates to work in education, therapy, and healthcare settings. Additionally, psychology remains a versatile degree, and those seeking a fast-track can opt for accelerated psychology programs online to launch their careers sooner.

Choosing an online program can lead to meaningful roles in counseling, education, mental health, and community leadership—often at a more affordable tuition and on a flexible schedule that fits your life.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Schneider

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles