World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4271 3949 2375 2146 180 9032

Lisa A. Eaton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa A. Eaton between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa A. Eaton published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2021. 21 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2021. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 9 publications
2004 2025

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa A. Eaton: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 8
2008 4
2009 8
2010 7
2011 7
2012 7
2013 12
2014 19
2015 13
2016 13
2017 13
2018 9
2019 7
2020 14
2021 24
2022 17
2023 14
2024 12
2025 9
Total 223
Download as CSV

Lisa A. Eaton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa A. Eaton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 180
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa A. Eaton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa A. Eaton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa A. Eaton is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on multidisciplinary aspects of medicine, psychology, and social sciences, with a significant emphasis on infectious diseases, social psychology, general health professions, epidemiology, and sociology and political science.

Their scholarly work centers around topics such as HIV/AIDS research and interventions, LGBTQ health, identity and policy, HIV, drug use, and sexual risk, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, sex work and related issues, sexuality, behavior and technology, as well as vaccine coverage and hesitancy.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Eaton include:

  • Ryan J. Watson
  • Seth C. Kalichman
  • Valerie A. Earnshaw
  • Moira O. Kalichman
  • Antonia E. Caba

Key publication venues where Eaton has contributed multiple works include:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Translational Behavioral Medicine

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Eaton include:

  • Social and behavioral health responses to COVID-19: lessons learned from four decades of an HIV pandemic, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Other related high-impact papers in the broader network of Eaton's research include:

  • COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support, 2020, Translational Behavioral Medicine
  • Integrating time into stigma and health research, 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Anticipated stigma, stereotypes, and COVID-19 testing, 2020, Stigma and Health
  • Intersecting Pandemics: Impact of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Protective Behaviors on People Living With HIV, Atlanta, Georgia, 2020, JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

Lisa A. Eaton's work spans significant public health concerns, particularly at the intersection of infectious disease epidemiology and social determinants of health. Their research investigates behavioral responses and policy considerations linked to HIV/AIDS and COVID-19, supporting a broad understanding of the health behaviors influencing vulnerable populations.

Best Publications

  • The Role of Stigma and Medical Mistrust in the Routine Health Care Engagement of Black Men Who Have Sex With Men

    Lisa A. Eaton;Daniel D. Driffin;Christopher Kegler;Harlan Smith

  • COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support.

    Valerie A Earnshaw;Lisa A Eaton;Seth C Kalichman;Natalie M Brousseau

  • Risk compensation in HIV prevention: implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies.

    Lisa A. Eaton;Seth C. Kalichman

  • Minimal Awareness and Stalled Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among at Risk, HIV-Negative, Black Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Lisa A. Eaton;Daniel D. Driffin;Jose Bauermeister;Harlan Smith

  • Stigma and Conspiracy Beliefs Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Interest in Using PrEP Among Black and White Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men.

    Lisa A. Eaton;Seth C. Kalichman;Devon Price;Stephanie Finneran

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus Viral Load in Blood Plasma and Semen : Review and Implications of Empirical Findings

    Seth C. Kalichman;Giorgio Di Berto;Lisa Eaton

  • A strategy for selecting sexual partners believed to pose little/no risks for HIV: serosorting and its implications for HIV transmission.

    Lisa A. Eaton;Seth C. Kalichman;Daniel A. O'Connell;William D. Karchner

  • A Multi-US City Assessment of Awareness and Uptake of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention Among Black Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men

    Lisa A. Eaton;Derrick D. Matthews;Daniel D. Driffin;Leigh Bukowski

  • Running Backwards: Consequences of Current HIV Incidence Rates for the Next Generation of Black MSM in the United States

    Derrick D. Matthews;A. L. Herrick;Robert W. S. Coulter;M. Reuel Friedman

  • Internet-based health information consumer skills intervention for people living with HIV/AIDS.

    Seth C. Kalichman;Charsey Cherry;Demetria Cain;Howard Pope

  • Adherence to antiretroviral therapy assessed by unannounced pill counts conducted by telephone.

    Seth C. Kalichman;Christina M. Amaral;Heidi Stearns;Denise White

  • Serosorting sexual partners and risk for HIV among men who have sex with men.

    Lisa A. Eaton;Seth C. Kalichman;Demetria N. Cain;Chauncey Cherry

  • Integrated Behavioral Intervention to Improve HIV/AIDS Treatment Adherence and Reduce HIV Transmission

    Seth C. Kalichman;Chauncey Cherry;Moira O. Kalichman;Christina M. Amaral

  • Gender-based violence, alcohol use, and sexual risk among female patrons of drinking venues in Cape Town, South Africa.

    Eileen V. Pitpitan;Seth C. Kalichman;Lisa A. Eaton;Demetria Cain

  • Examining Factors Co-Existing with Interpersonal Violence in Lesbian Relationships

    Lisa Eaton;Michelle Kaufman;Andrea Fuhrel;Demetria Cain

  • Monitoring Medication Adherence by Unannounced Pill Counts Conducted by Telephone: Reliability and Criterion-Related Validity

    Seth C. Kalichman;Christina M. Amaral;Chauncey Cherry;Jody Flanagan

  • Intentional Non-Adherence to Medications among HIV Positive Alcohol Drinkers: Prospective Study of Interactive Toxicity Beliefs

    Seth C. Kalichman;Tamar Grebler;Christina M. Amaral;Megan McNerey

  • Adherence to antiretroviral therapy and HIV transmission risks: implications for test-and-treat approaches to HIV prevention.

    Seth C. Kalichman;Chauncey Cherry;Christina M. Amaral;Connie Swetzes

  • Brief Behavioral Self-Regulation Counseling for HIV Treatment Adherence Delivered by Cell Phone: An Initial Test of Concept Trial

    Seth C. Kalichman;Moira O. Kalichman;Chauncey Cherry;Connie Swetzes

Frequent Co-Authors

Seth C. Kalichman
Seth C. Kalichman University of Connecticut
Demetria Cain
Demetria Cain City University of New York
Ryan J. Watson
Ryan J. Watson University of Connecticut
Kathleen J. Sikkema
Kathleen J. Sikkema Columbia University
Valerie A. Earnshaw
Valerie A. Earnshaw University of Delaware
Ron Stall
Ron Stall University of Pittsburgh
Leickness C. Simbayi
Leickness C. Simbayi Human Sciences Research Council
Michael P. Carey
Michael P. Carey Brown University
José A. Bauermeister
José A. Bauermeister University of Pennsylvania
Kate B. Carey
Kate B. Carey Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up many rewarding career options and online degree pathways. One popular field is social work, which blends psychological theory with practical support for individuals and communities. Prospective social workers can pursue online bachelor's or master's programs, making this career accessible for learners nationwide.

Each state sets its own licensing rules. For example, you can review the Indiana social work license requirements to understand educational and examination standards. Similarly, those planning to practice elsewhere may want to check the requirements to be a social worker in Iowa, or look into what's involved in becoming a social worker in Kansas.

To work as a social worker, most states require at least a bachelor’s degree in social work or a related field, followed by supervised experience. For those focusing on Kentucky, the Kentucky social work education requirements provide a useful overview.

Whether your goal is clinical practice, research, or community support, online degrees in psychology and social work offer flexibility to build the right skills for your chosen path.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa A. Eaton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles