World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Timothy G. Lohman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy G. Lohman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Timothy G. Lohman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy G. Lohman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy G. Lohman is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and works primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Cell Biology, Ecology, and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a focus on topics such as obesity, physical activity, diet, muscle metabolism and nutrition, agricultural sustainability and environmental impact, body composition measurement techniques, physical education and training studies, children's physical and motor development, and textile materials and evaluations.

  • Promoting Physical Activity in Middle School Girls: Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (2020), Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
  • The Environmental Impact of the Athlete's Plate Nutrition Education Tool (2020), Nutrients
  • Systematic organisation of skinfold callipers: an approach based on physical-mechanical properties and characteristics (2025), British Journal Of Nutrition
  • The Effects Of Training Method And Experience Level On Measurement Error For Skinfold Thicknesses (2020), Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • The Accuracy Of Four Component Models Using Body Volume Equations And Field-based Water Measurements (2021), Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Lohman has frequently collaborated with co-authors including David M. Murray, Laurie A. Milliken, June Stevens, Sally M. Davis, and Alba Reguant-Closa. These partnerships have resulted in multiple joint publications.

  • David M. Murray
  • Laurie A. Milliken
  • June Stevens
  • Sally M. Davis
  • Alba Reguant-Closa

The scientist's work has appeared most often in the venue UNC Libraries, with six publications. Other frequent publication platforms include Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Nutrients, Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina), and British Journal Of Nutrition.

  • UNC Libraries
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Nutrients
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
  • British Journal Of Nutrition

This research profile highlights a concentration on investigative studies related to body composition and physical activity interventions as well as the environmental aspects of nutrition education. The blend of topics indicates a multidisciplinary approach combining health sciences, environmental concerns, and biomechanics.

Best Publications

  • Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth.

    M. H. Slaughter;T. G. Lohman;R. A. Boileau;Craig A. Horswill

  • Advances in Body Composition Assessment

    Timothy G. Lohman

  • Human Body Composition

    Alex F. Roche;Steven Heymsfield;Timothy G. Lohman

  • Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness: a review.

    Lohman Tg

  • Pathways: a school-based, randomized controlled trial for the prevention of obesity in American Indian schoolchildren

    Benjamin Caballero;Theresa Clay;Sally M. Davis;Becky Ethelbah

  • Applicability of body composition techniques and constants for children and youths.

    Lohman Tg

  • Body fatness and risk for elevated blood pressure, total cholesterol, and serum lipoprotein ratios in children and adolescents.

    D P Williams;S B Going;T G Lohman;D W Harsha

  • Why bioelectrical impedance analysis should be used for estimating adiposity.

    Linda B. Houtkooper;Timothy G. Lohman;Scott B. Going;Wanda H. Howell

  • A review of psychosocial pre‐treatment predictors of weight control

    P. J. Teixeira;S. B. Going;L. B. Sardinha;T. G. Lohman

  • Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission.

    Timothy R. Ackland;Timothy G. Lohman;Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen;Ronald J. Maughan

  • Pretreatment predictors of attrition and successful weight management in women

    P J Teixeira;S B Going;L B Houtkooper;E C Cussler

  • Bioelectrical impedance estimation of fat-free body mass in children and youth: a cross-validation study.

    L. B. Houtkooper;S. B. Going;T. G. Lohman;A. F. Roche

  • Assessment of Body Composition in Children

    Timothy G. Lohman

  • Promoting Physical Activity in Middle School Girls: Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls

    Larry S. Webber;Diane J. Catellier;Leslie A. Lytle;David M. Murray

  • Effects of resistance training on regional and total bone mineral density in premenopausal women: A randomized prospective study

    T. Lohman;S. Going;R. Pamenter;M. Hall

  • A description of the social–ecological framework used in the trial of activity for adolescent girls (TAAG)

    John P. Elder;Leslie Lytle;James F. Sallis;Deborah Rohm Young

  • Receiver operating characteristic analysis of body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness, and arm girth for obesity screening in children and adolescents

    Luis B Sardinha;Scott B Going;Pedro J Teixeira;Timothy G Lohman

  • How to minimise the health risks to athletes who compete in weight-sensitive sports review and position statement on behalf of the Ad Hoc Research Working Group on Body Composition, Health and Performance, under the auspices of the IOC Medical Commission

    Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen;Nanna L Meyer;Timothy G Lohman;Timothy R Ackland

  • Measurement of fat mass using DEXA: a validation study in elderly adults.

    Loran M. Salamone;Thomas Fuerst;Marjolein Visser;Marialice Kern

  • Exercise motivation, eating, and body image variables as predictors of weight control.

    Pedro J. Teixeira;Scott B. Going;Linda B. Houtkooper;Ellen C. Cussler

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott B. Going
Scott B. Going University of Arizona
Luís B. Sardinha
Luís B. Sardinha University of Lisbon
Russell R. Pate
Russell R. Pate University of South Carolina
Ronald J. Maughan
Ronald J. Maughan University of St Andrews
June Stevens
June Stevens University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Larry S. Webber
Larry S. Webber Tulane University
Michael L. Pollock
Michael L. Pollock University of Florida
Leslie A. Lytle
Leslie A. Lytle University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Frances A. Tylavsky
Frances A. Tylavsky University of Tennessee Health Science Center
John P. Elder
John P. Elder San Diego State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can help you find the right fit, whether you’re looking for accelerated options or programs with fewer entry barriers. For those interested in becoming a nurse quickly, consider entry level msn programs online, ideal for non-nurses seeking a direct route into advanced nursing roles.

If you’re searching for programs with higher acceptance rates, review the easiest bsn program to get into. These schools may offer a less competitive and more accessible entry into the nursing profession.

Not everyone interested in healthcare needs to provide bedside care. Careers such as medical billing and coding offer vital back-end support in the industry. There are a variety of financial aid for medical billing and coding programs available, making this a cost-effective career option.

Additionally, if exam requirements are a concern, some institutions now offer nursing programs without teas. These accessible options can simplify your journey into the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy G. Lohman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles