World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
105
Citations
35776
World Ranking
630
National Ranking
318

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
42188
World Ranking
5181
National Ranking
2801

Richard A. Lewis publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 320 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Richard A. Lewis D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard A. Lewis is a researcher affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their work spans a range of topics primarily within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a significant focus on genetics and molecular biology research.

The research conducted by Richard A. Lewis covers various subfields including genetics, molecular biology, ophthalmology, neurology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. Their investigations address multiple medical and biological topics such as glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, genomics and rare diseases, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, congenital heart defects research, and ocular surface and contact lens studies.

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Jill A. Rosenfeld, Carlos A. Bacino, Lindsay C. Burrage, Brendan Lee, and Alyssa A. Tran, reflecting ongoing scientific partnerships across multiple projects.

Their research outputs are often published in established venues, including:

  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine

Recent publications by Richard A. Lewis include:

  • Long-term Outcomes of Adding Lutein/Zeaxanthin and ω-3 Fatty Acids to the AREDS Supplements on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Progression, 2022, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Fixed-Dose Combination of Netarsudil and Latanoprost in Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma: Pooled Efficacy/Safety Analysis of Phase 3 MERCURY-1 and -2, 2020, Advances in Therapy
  • Pooled Efficacy and Safety Profile of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension, 2020, Journal of Glaucoma
  • Clinical sites of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network: unique contributions to genomic medicine and science, 2020, Genetics in Medicine
  • Four-Year Outcomes of Two Second-Generation Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma on One Medication, 2020, Clinical Ophthalmology

Best Publications

  • A photoreceptor cell-specific ATP-binding transporter gene (ABCR) is mutated in recessive Stargardt macular dystrophy

    Rando Allikmets;Nanda Singh;Hui Sun;Noah F. Shroyer

  • Mutations in smooth muscle α-actin ( ACTA2 ) lead to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections

    Dong Chuan Guo;Hariyadarshi Pannu;Van Tran-Fadulu;Christina L. Papke

  • Genomic rearrangement in NEMO impairs NF-kappaB activation and is a cause of incontinentia pigmenti. The International Incontinentia Pigmenti (IP) Consortium.

    Asmae Smahi;G. Courtois;P. Vabres;S. Yamaoka

  • Basal body dysfunction is a likely cause of pleiotropic Bardet–Biedl syndrome

    Stephen J. Ansley;Jose L. Badano;Oliver E. Blacque;Josephine Hill

  • Triallelic Inheritance in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome, a Mendelian Recessive Disorder

    Nicholas Katsanis;Stephen J. Ansley;Jose L. Badano;Erica R. Eichers

  • Multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with persistent conduction block

    Richard A. Lewis;Austin J. Sumner;Mark J. Brown;Arthur K. Asbury

  • The Lowe's oculocerebrorenal syndrome gene encodes a protein highly homologous to inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase.

    Attree O;Olivos Im;Okabe I;Bailey Lc

  • Neurological dysfunction and axonal degeneration in Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 1A

    Karen M. Krajewski;Richard A. Lewis;Darren R. Fuerst;Cheryl Turansky

  • Reliability and validity of the CMT neuropathy score as a measure of disability

    Michael E. Shy;J. Blake;K. Krajewski;D. R. Fuerst

  • Hypomorphic mutations in syndromic encephalocele genes are associated with Bardet-Biedl syndrome

    Carmen C Leitch;Norann A Zaghloul;Erica E Davis;Corinne Stoetzel

  • Characterization of Potocki-Lupski syndrome (dup(17)(p11.2p11.2)) and delineation of a dosage-sensitive critical interval that can convey an autism phenotype.

    Lorraine Potocki;Weimin Bi;Diane Treadwell-Deering;Claudia M. B. Carvalho

  • Multi-disciplinary clinical study of Smith-Magenis syndrome (deletion 17p11.2)

    Frank Greenberg;Richard A. Lewis;Lorraine Potocki;Daniel Glaze

  • Exome Capture Reveals ZNF423 and CEP164 Mutations, Linking Renal Ciliopathies to DNA Damage Response Signaling

    Moumita Chaki;Rannar Airik;Amiya K. Ghosh;Rachel H. Giles

  • Mutations in CYP1B1, the gene for cytochrome P4501B1, are the predominant cause of primary congenital glaucoma in Saudi Arabia.

    Bassem A. Bejjani;Richard Alan Lewis;Karim F. Tomey;Kent L. Anderson

  • Practice Parameter: Evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: Role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review) Report of the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

    J. D. England;J. D. England;G. S. Gronseth;G. Franklin;G. T. Carter

  • Molecular Genetics of Human Blue Cone Monochromacy

    Jeremy Nathans;Carol M. Davenport;Irene H. Maumenee;Richard Alan Lewis

  • TTC21B contributes both causal and modifying alleles across the ciliopathy spectrum

    Erica E. Davis;Qi Zhang;Qin Liu;Bill H. Diplas

  • von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. II. Incidence of optic gliomata.

    Lewis Ra;Gerson Lp;Axelson Ka;Riccardi Vm

  • Candidate exome capture identifies mutation of SDCCAG8 as the cause of a retinal-renal ciliopathy

    Edgar A Otto;Toby W Hurd;Rannar Airik;Moumita Chaki

  • Triallelic inheritance in Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a Mendelian recessive disorder.

    N Katsanis;SJ Ansley;JL Badano;ER Eichers

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Lupski
James R. Lupski Baylor College of Medicine
Nicholas Katsanis
Nicholas Katsanis Galatea Bio Inc
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine
Philip L. Beales
Philip L. Beales University College London
Donna M. Muzny
Donna M. Muzny Baylor College of Medicine
Lorraine Potocki
Lorraine Potocki Baylor College of Medicine
Erica E. Davis
Erica E. Davis Lurie Children's Hospital
Christian P. Schaaf
Christian P. Schaaf Baylor College of Medicine
Robert L. Nussbaum
Robert L. Nussbaum University of California, San Francisco
David L. Nelson
David L. Nelson Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA can open the doors to a variety of related careers within healthcare and research. Many professionals looking to expand their genetics knowledge may consider online degrees as flexible and cost-effective options.

For those interested in clinical practice, exploring a nurse practitioner degree online could be a strategic next step. Similarly, a online nursing degree provides foundational medical knowledge and patient care skills, which often overlap with genetic counseling and testing roles.

Those pursuing advanced leadership or specialized roles can look into the cheapest dnp programs. These programs can help genetics professionals move into executive or clinical educator positions.

If you are a registered nurse aiming to integrate genetics into your clinical practice, consider the rn to bsn pathway. This credential often leads to increased opportunities in both hospital and laboratory settings.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles