World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
119
Citations
40536
World Ranking
393
National Ranking
201

Medicine

D-Index
124
Citations
45626
World Ranking
3250
National Ranking
1792

Samuel G. Jacobson publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel G. Jacobson sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 415 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Samuel G. Jacobson D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel G. Jacobson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Samuel G. Jacobson was affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research focused primarily on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. Within these broad areas, their major subfields of study included Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work concentrated on several key topics related to vision science and genetic disorders. These included:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Ocular Disorders and Treatments
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions

Jacobson contributed to a variety of journals and scientific venues, with multiple publications in:

  • iScience
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • Nature Medicine
  • Human Gene Therapy
  • Molecular Therapy

Their recent published papers include:

  • Intravitreal antisense oligonucleotide sepofarsen in Leber congenital amaurosis type 10: a phase 1b/2 trial, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Durable vision improvement after a single treatment with antisense oligonucleotide sepofarsen: a case report, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Full-field stimulus testing: Role in the clinic and as an outcome measure in clinical trials of severe childhood retinal disease, 2021, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
  • Safety and improved efficacy signals following gene therapy in childhood blindness caused by GUCY2D mutations, 2021, iScience
  • Toxicity and Efficacy Evaluation of an Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Expressing Codon-Optimized RPGR Delivered by Subretinal Injection in a Canine Model of X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa, 2020, Human Gene Therapy

Throughout their career, Jacobson collaborated with researchers who appeared frequently as co-authors in their publications. Notable collaborators included:

  • Artur V. Cideciyan
  • Alejandro J. Román
  • Alexander Sumaroka
  • Małgorzata Świder
  • Alexandra V. Garafalo

Best Publications

  • Gene therapy restores vision in a canine model of childhood blindness.

    Gregory M. Acland;Gustavo D. Aguirre;Jharna Ray;Qi Zhang

  • Treatment of Leber Congenital Amaurosis Due to RPE65 Mutations by Ocular Subretinal Injection of Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Vector: Short-Term Results of a Phase I Trial

    William W. Hauswirth;Tomas S. Aleman;Shalesh Kaushal;Artur V. Cideciyan

  • Human gene therapy for RPE65 isomerase deficiency activates the retinoid cycle of vision but with slow rod kinetics

    Artur V. Cideciyan;Tomas S. Aleman;Sanford L. Boye;Sharon B. Schwartz

  • Mutations in MERTK, the human orthologue of the RCS rat retinal dystrophy gene, cause retinitis pigmentosa.

    Andreas Gal;Yun Li;Debra A. Thompson;Jessica Weir

  • Gene therapy for leber congenital amaurosis caused by RPE65 mutations: safety and efficacy in 15 children and adults followed up to 3 years

    Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Ramakrishna Ratnakaram;Elise Heon

  • Cone-rod dystrophy due to mutations in a novel photoreceptor-specific homeobox gene (CRX) essential for maintenance of the photoreceptor

    Carol L. Freund;Cheryl Y. Gregory-Evans;Takahisa Furukawa;Myrto Papaioannou

  • Long-Term Restoration of Rod and Cone Vision by Single Dose rAAV-Mediated Gene Transfer to the Retina in a Canine Model of Childhood Blindness

    Gregory M. Acland;Gustavo D. Aguirre;Jean Bennett;Tomas S. Aleman

  • Mutation of a nuclear receptor gene, NR2E3, causes enhanced S cone syndrome, a disorder of retinal cell fate

    Neena B. Haider;Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Ruth Swiderski

  • Rhodopsin mutations in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.

    Ching Hwa Sung;Carol M. Davenport;Jill C. Hennessey;Irene H. Maumenee

  • Human retinal gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis shows advancing retinal degeneration despite enduring visual improvement

    Artur V. Cideciyan;Samuel G. Jacobson;William A. Beltran;Alexander Sumaroka

  • Identification of the gene (BBS1) most commonly involved in Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a complex human obesity syndrome.

    Kirk Mykytyn;Darryl Y. Nishimura;Charles C. Searby;Mythreyi Shastri

  • Human RPE65 Gene Therapy for Leber Congenital Amaurosis: Persistence of Early Visual Improvements and Safety at 1 Year

    Artur V. Cideciyan;William W. Hauswirth;Tomas S. Aleman;Shalesh Kaushal

  • Total colourblindness is caused by mutations in the gene encoding the alpha-subunit of the cone photoreceptor cGMP-gated cation channel.

    Susanne Kohl;Tim Marx;Ian Giddings;Herbert Jägle

  • Improvement and decline in vision with gene therapy in childhood blindness.

    Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Alejandro J. Roman;Alexander Sumaroka

  • Mutations in NYX, encoding the leucine-rich proteoglycan nyctalopin, cause X-linked complete congenital stationary night blindness.

    N.Torben Bech-Hansen;Margaret J. Naylor;Tracy A. Maybaum;Rebecca L. Sparkes

  • CNGA3 Mutations in Hereditary Cone Photoreceptor Disorders

    Bernd Wissinger;Daphne Gamer;Herbert Jägle;Roberto Giorda

  • De novo mutations in the CRX homeobox gene associated with Leber congenital amaurosis.

    C. L. Freund;Q.-L. Wang;Shiming Chen;B. L. Muskat

  • Genetically engineered large animal model for studying cone photoreceptor survival and degeneration in retinitis pigmentosa

    Petters Rm;Alexander Ca;Wells Kd;Collins Eb

  • Psychophysical Evidence for Rod Vulnerability in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

    Cynthia Owsley;Gregory R. Jackson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Yijun Huang

  • Mutations in the Cone-Rod Homeobox Gene Are Associated with the Cone-Rod Dystrophy Photoreceptor Degeneration

    Prabodha K. Swain;Shiming Chen;Qing Liang Wang;Louisa M. Affatigato

Frequent Co-Authors

Artur V. Cideciyan
Artur V. Cideciyan University of Pennsylvania
Tomas S. Aleman
Tomas S. Aleman University of Pennsylvania
Edwin M. Stone
Edwin M. Stone University of Iowa
William W. Hauswirth
William W. Hauswirth University of Florida
Gustavo D. Aguirre
Gustavo D. Aguirre University of Pennsylvania
Anand Swaroop
Anand Swaroop National Institutes of Health
Val C. Sheffield
Val C. Sheffield University of Iowa
Elise Héon
Elise Héon University of Toronto
Gerald A. Fishman
Gerald A. Fishman University of Illinois at Chicago
Jean Bennett
Jean Bennett University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding healthcare and research careers. Many students interested in genetic sciences also explore related healthcare fields, especially as the demand for well-qualified nurses and advanced practitioners grows.

For those looking to blend genetics with patient care, consider pursuing affordable fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. These programs let you gain advanced clinical skills and serve patients across the lifespan.

If you're starting your nursing journey, an online nursing degree delivers flexible learning and foundational knowledge. Registered nurses interested in leadership roles can take the next step with dnp programs, focusing on the highest levels of clinical practice and research.

Additionally, the online rn to bsn programs help working RNs advance their qualifications while continuing to work. These degrees are particularly valuable for those looking to integrate modern genetics concepts into nursing care.

Online study options make these pathways more accessible and affordable, offering flexibility for career-changers, working professionals, and students seeking specializations at the intersection of genetics and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Samuel G. Jacobson

Recently Published Articles