World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
USA
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
135
Citations
59689
World Ranking
219
National Ranking
112

Medicine

D-Index
139
Citations
63434
World Ranking
1773
National Ranking
1014

Edwin M. Stone publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin M. Stone sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 694 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Edwin M. Stone D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin M. Stone sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 135 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in United States Leader Award

Overview

Edwin M. Stone is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Stone's scholarly output reflects a focus on ophthalmology and molecular biology, with notable contributions to radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and immunology.

The scientist's recent publications highlight engagement with retinal research and ocular biology, particularly through gene expression and single-cell sequencing approaches. Noteworthy papers include:

  • Spectacle: An interactive resource for ocular single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis, 2020, Experimental Eye Research
  • Bulk and single-cell gene expression analyses reveal aging human choriocapillaris has pro-inflammatory phenotype, 2020, Microvascular Research
  • Single-cell RNA sequencing in vision research: Insights into human retinal health and disease, 2020, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
  • Choroidal endothelial and macrophage gene expression in atrophic and neovascular macular degeneration, 2022, Human Molecular Genetics
  • Retinal Tropism and Transduction of Adeno-Associated Virus Varies by Serotype and Route of Delivery (Intravitreal, Subretinal, or Suprachoroidal) in Rats, 2020, Human Gene Therapy

Their primary research topics encompass retinal development and disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, retinal imaging and analysis, as well as single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Additional topics of research include glaucoma and retinal disorders, CRISPR and genetic engineering, and neuroscience and neural engineering.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stone include:

  • Robert F. Mullins
  • Budd A. Tucker
  • Ian C. Han
  • Andrew P. Voigt
  • Nathaniel K. Mullin

Scientific output is distributed across several key publication venues, with multiple papers published in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Experimental Eye Research
  • Human Molecular Genetics
  • Ophthalmology Retina
  • JAMA Ophthalmology

The main fields of study for Stone include Medicine with 111 publications and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology with 102 publications. Within these fields, their work in molecular biology and ophthalmology stands out, supported by research bridging imaging techniques and cellular neuroscience. The relative volume of publications indicates sustained involvement in both fundamental molecular studies and clinical vision science applications.

Best Publications

  • Safety and Efficacy of Gene Transfer for Leber's Congenital Amaurosis

    Albert M. Maguire;Francesca Simonelli;Eric A. Pierce;Edward N. Pugh

  • Identification of a Gene That Causes Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

    Edwin M. Stone;John H. Fingert;Wallace L. M. Alward;Thai D. Nguyen

  • Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

    Stephen Russell;Jean Bennett;Jennifer A. Wellman;Daniel C. Chung

  • Mutations in the SMAD4/DPC4 gene in juvenile polyposis.

    James R. Howe;Stina Roth;John C. Ringold;Robert W. Summers

  • Age-dependent effects of RPE65 gene therapy for Leber's congenital amaurosis: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial

    Albert M. Maguire;Albert M. Maguire;Katherine A. High;Katherine A. High;Alberto Auricchio;J. Fraser Wright;J. Fraser Wright

  • The sensitivity of single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis for the detection of single base substitutions.

    Val C. Sheffield;John S. Beck;Anne E. Kwitek;Dirk W. Sandstrom

  • Human gene therapy for RPE65 isomerase deficiency activates the retinoid cycle of vision but with slow rod kinetics

    Artur V. Cideciyan;Tomas S. Aleman;Sanford L. Boye;Sharon B. Schwartz

  • Gene therapy for leber congenital amaurosis caused by RPE65 mutations: safety and efficacy in 15 children and adults followed up to 3 years

    Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Ramakrishna Ratnakaram;Elise Heon

  • Analysis of Myocilin Mutations in 1703 Glaucoma Patients From Five Different Populations

    John H. Fingert;Elise Héon;Jeffrey M. Liebmann;Tetsuya Yamamoto

  • Genetic linkage of familial open angle glaucoma to chromosome 1q21–q31

    Val C. Sheffield;Edwin M. Stone;Wallace L.M. Alward;Arlene V. Drack

  • Clinical Features Associated with Mutations in the Chromosome 1 Open-Angle Glaucoma Gene (GLC1A)

    W. L. M. Alward;J. H. Fingert;M. A. Coote;A. T. Johnson

  • Mutation of a nuclear receptor gene, NR2E3, causes enhanced S cone syndrome, a disorder of retinal cell fate

    Neena B. Haider;Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Ruth Swiderski

  • The forkhead transcription factor gene FKHL7 is responsible for glaucoma phenotypes which map to 6p25.

    Darryl Y. Nishimura;Ruth E. Swiderski;Wallace L. M. Alward;Charles C. Searby

  • A single EFEMP1 mutation associated with both Malattia Leventinese and Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy.

    Edwin M. Stone;Andrew J. Lotery;Francis L. Munier;Elise Héon

  • Homozygosity Mapping With SNP Arrays Identifies TRIM32, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase, as a Bardet-Biedl Syndrome Gene (BBS11)

    Annie P. Chiang;John S. Beck;Hsan Jan Yen;Marwan K. Tayeh

  • Cloning and sequencing of a deoxyribonucleic acid copy of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase messenger ribonucleic acid isolated from chicken muscle.

    Achilles Dugaiczyk;Jay A. Haron;Edwin M. Stone;Olivia E. Dennison

  • Leber congenital amaurosis - a model for efficient genetic testing of heterogeneous disorders: LXIV Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.

    Edwin M. Stone

  • An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge.

    Catherine A. Brownstein;Alan H. Beggs;Nils Homer;Barry Merriman

  • Phenotypic Variation Including Retinitis Pigmentosa, Pattern Dystrophy, and Fundus Flavimaculatus in a Single Family With a Deletion of Codon 153 or 154 of the Peripherin/RDS Gene

    Richard G. Weleber;Ronald E. Carr;Ronald E. Carr;Ronald E. Carr;William H. Murphey;Val C. Sheffield

  • Identification of the gene (BBS1) most commonly involved in Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a complex human obesity syndrome.

    Kirk Mykytyn;Darryl Y. Nishimura;Charles C. Searby;Mythreyi Shastri

Frequent Co-Authors

Val C. Sheffield
Val C. Sheffield University of Iowa
Robert F. Mullins
Robert F. Mullins University of Iowa
Budd A. Tucker
Budd A. Tucker University of Iowa
Samuel G. Jacobson
Samuel G. Jacobson University of Pennsylvania
John H. Fingert
John H. Fingert University of Iowa
Todd E. Scheetz
Todd E. Scheetz University of Iowa
Artur V. Cideciyan
Artur V. Cideciyan University of Pennsylvania
Gerald A. Fishman
Gerald A. Fishman University of Illinois at Chicago
Tomas S. Aleman
Tomas S. Aleman University of Pennsylvania
Elise Héon
Elise Héon University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Genetics opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career paths in healthcare. Many students consider fields that complement genetics, such as medical billing and coding, nursing, or healthcare administration. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, exploring a healthcare administration degree can lead to roles in managing hospitals, research centers, or biotech firms.

If affordability is an important factor, there are plenty of healthcare administration degrees offered online at reasonable costs. Additionally, students interested in a quick entry into the healthcare workforce might consider finding an easy nursing program to get into or obtaining a medical coding certification cost-effectively.

Each of these career pathways can offer stability, growth, and strong job prospects. Exploring online options makes it possible to broaden your skill set or to specialize—sometimes in as little as a year—while maintaining flexibility in your education and career planning.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin M. Stone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles