World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
17338
World Ranking
6566
National Ranking
103

Valentín Ceña publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valentín Ceña sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 132 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Valentín Ceña D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valentín Ceña sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Valentín Ceña is affiliated with the University of Castilla-La Mancha in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and materials science.

The main fields of study that characterize their work include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Materials Science

Within these broad areas, their research delves into several subfields such as:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Biomaterials
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Biochemistry

Key scientific topics featured prominently in their publications are:

  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Sulfur Compounds in Biology

The scientist's work appears frequently in several journals, demonstrating a range of interests in pharmaceutical and molecular sciences. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Pharmaceutics
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Pharmacological Research
  • Drug Discovery Today
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Valentín Ceña provide insight into specific research topics and collaborations. These include:

  • Endocytosis: The Nanoparticle and Submicron Nanocompounds Gateway into the Cell, 2020, Pharmaceutics
  • Dendrimers toward Translational Nanotherapeutics: Concise Key Step Analysis, 2020, Bioconjugate Chemistry
  • Dendrimer- and polymeric nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates as nonviral delivery systems: a new approach in medicine, 2020, Drug Discovery Today
  • Engineered non-invasive functionalized dendrimer/dendron-entrapped/complexed gold nanoparticles as a novel class of theranostic (radio)pharmaceuticals in cancer therapy, 2021, Journal of Controlled Release
  • Synthesis, self-assembly and anticancer drug encapsulation and delivery properties of cyclodextrin-based giant amphiphiles, 2020, Carbohydrate Polymers

Frequent co-authorship is observed with several researchers, indicating ongoing collaborations in their research projects. These co-authors include:

  • Serge Mignani
  • Jean-Pierre Majoral
  • Inmaculada Posadas
  • José M. García Fernández
  • Xiangyang Shi

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Sequential Treatment of SH‐SY5Y Cells with Retinoic Acid and Brain‐Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gives Rise to Fully Differentiated, Neurotrophic Factor‐Dependent, Human Neuron‐Like Cells

    Mario Encinas;Montse Iglesias;Yuhui Liu;Hongyin Wang

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • D1 but not D5 Dopamine Receptors Are Critical for LTP, Spatial Learning, and LTP-Induced arc and zif268 Expression in the Hippocampus

    Noelia Granado;Oskar Ortiz;Luz M. Suárez;Eduardo D. Martín

  • Adenosine released by astrocytes contributes to hypoxia‐induced modulation of synaptic transmission

    Eduardo D. Martín;Miriam Fernández;Gertrudis Perea;Olivier Pascual

  • Nanoparticle crossing of blood-brain barrier: a road to new therapeutic approaches to central nervous system diseases.

    Valentín Ceña;Valentín Ceña;Pablo Játiva;Pablo Játiva

  • Mitochondrial Dysfunction Is Involved in Apoptosis Induced by Serum Withdrawal and Fatty Acids in the β-Cell Line Ins-1

    Isabel Maestre;Joaquín Jordán;Soledad Calvo;Juan Antonio Reig

  • Barriers to Non-Viral Vector-Mediated Gene Delivery in the Nervous System

    Francisco C. Pérez-Martínez;Javier Guerra;Inmaculada Posadas;Inmaculada Posadas;Valentín Ceña;Valentín Ceña

  • Group-I metabotropic glutamate receptors: hypotheses to explain their dual role in neurotoxicity and neuroprotection

    F Nicoletti;V Bruno;M.V Catania;G Battaglia

  • Pharmacological dissection of receptor-associated and voltage-sensitive ionic channels involved in catecholamine release.

    V Ceña;G P Nicolas;P Sanchez-Garcia;S M Kirpekar

  • Glitazones Differentially Regulate Primary Astrocyte and Glioma Cell Survival INVOLVEMENT OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES AND PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR-γ

    José M. Pérez-Ortiz;Pedro Tranque;Cecilia F. Vaquero;Beatriz Domingo

  • Mitochondrial control of neuron death and its role in neurodegenerative disorders.

    J. Jordán;V. Ceña;J. H. M. Prehn

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor modulates the severity of cognitive alterations induced by mutant huntingtin: Involvement of phospholipaseCγ activity and glutamate receptor expression

    A. Giralt;T. Rodrigo;E.D. Martín;J.R. Gonzalez

  • Nicotinic Receptors in Neurodegeneration

    Inmaculada Posadas;Beatriz López-Hernández;Valentín Ceña

  • Differential expression and enzymatic properties of the Na+,K(+)-ATPase alpha 3 isoenzyme in rat pineal glands.

    Andrew W. Shyjan;Valentin Cena;David C. Klein;Robert Levenson

  • Nanoparticles for brain-specific drug and genetic material delivery, imaging and diagnosis.

    Inmaculada Posadas;Inmaculada Posadas;Silvia Monteagudo;Silvia Monteagudo;Valentín Ceña;Valentín Ceña

  • Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor Increases Intracellular Calcium Concentration ROLE OF CALCIUM/CALMODULIN IN THE ACTIVATION OF THE PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASE PATHWAY

    M. José Pérez-García;Valentín Ceña;Yolanda de Pablo;Marta Llovera

  • Acetaminophen induces apoptosis in rat cortical neurons

    Inmaculada Posadas;Inmaculada Posadas;Pablo Santos;Pablo Santos;Almudena Blanco;Almudena Blanco;Maríangeles Muñoz-Fernández;Maríangeles Muñoz-Fernández

  • Lifeguard/neuronal membrane protein 35 regulates Fas ligand‐mediated apoptosis in neurons via microdomain recruitment

    Miriam Fernández;Miguel F. Segura;Carme Solé;Alicia Colino

  • Bcl-x L blocks mitochondrial multiple conductance channel activation and inhibits 6-OHDA-induced death in SH-SY5Y cells.

    Joaquín Jordán;María F Galindo;Daniel Tornero;Carmen González-García

Frequent Co-Authors

Joaquín Jordán
Joaquín Jordán University of Castilla-La Mancha
Serge Mignani
Serge Mignani Universidade da Madeira
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
David C. Klein
David C. Klein National Institutes of Health
José M. García Fernández
José M. García Fernández University of Seville
Eduardo D. Martín
Eduardo D. Martín Yale School of Medicine
Hsing Jien Kung
Hsing Jien Kung Taipei Medical University
Maurizio Molinari
Maurizio Molinari Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Xiangyang Shi
Xiangyang Shi Donghua University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience online can open doors to a wide range of career pathways. Students often pair neuroscience with other disciplines or pursue additional credentials online to boost their earnings and employability. Some of the most profitable majors—such as computer science, engineering, and health sciences—offer excellent salary prospects when combined with neuroscience or related fields.

For those seeking affordable education, many online colleges that accept fafsa make studying neuroscience and related degrees financially accessible. Flexible programs allow students to study part-time while working or managing other commitments.

Short-term programs are also a valuable path. Earning certificate programs that pay well—such as certifications in data analytics, medical technology, or public health—can help neuroscience students expand their skillsets quickly. For those interested in lighter academic loads, some of the easiest online bachelor degree options may complement a neuroscience education or help students meet prerequisites.

Selecting the right blend of online degrees, certificates, and career planning can empower neuroscience students to reach their professional goals in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Valentín Ceña

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles