World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 34 3132 2844 110 104 153 4251

Martin T. Bohl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin T. Bohl between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin T. Bohl published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2006. 1 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2006. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1995 2025

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin T. Bohl: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 10
2000 4
2001 1
2002 3
2003 9
2004 10
2005 11
2006 14
2007 3
2008 10
2009 5
2010 8
2011 9
2012 6
2013 7
2014 2
2015 12
2016 8
2017 4
2018 6
2019 6
2020 4
2021 4
2022 3
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 169
Download as CSV

Martin T. Bohl publications per year - data summary

  • Martin T. Bohl, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Münster, has 169 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2006, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2001, 2023 and 2025, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 31 years in the span carries no publications at all (2024).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.6 per year counting only the 30 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 9 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 56 publications (5.1 per year); 2006-2016: 84 publications (7.6 per year); 2017-2025: 29 publications (3.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Martin T. Bohl publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin T. Bohl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–156 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100 153
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Martin T. Bohl publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Martin T. Bohl, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Münster, records 153 publications - the 43rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 43% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Martin T. Bohl, and about 57% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Martin T. Bohl ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Martin T. Bohl D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin T. Bohl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171 34
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin T. Bohl D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Martin T. Bohl, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Münster, records 34 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Martin T. Bohl, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Martin T. Bohl ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Martin T. Bohl is affiliated with the University of Münster in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of economics, econometrics, and finance. Their work spans multiple specialized subfields, including economics and econometrics, finance, general economics, electrical and electronic engineering, and strategy and management.

Their research primarily addresses topics such as market dynamics and volatility, financial markets and investment strategies, and monetary policy and economic impact. Additional areas of focus include complex systems and time series analysis, political influence and corporate strategies, media influence and politics, and aspects related to the wine industry and tourism.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work include Alexander Pütz, Christoph Sulewski, Pierre L. Siklos, Devmali Perera, and Jędrzej Białkowski. Their contributions appear in a range of academic journals, with the most recurrent venues being the Journal of Commodity Markets, Research in International Business and Finance, Journal of International Money and Finance, Journal of Futures Markets, and Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin T. Bohl cover various aspects of commodity futures markets and central banking communication. These include:

  • Speculation and the informational efficiency of commodity futures markets, 2020, Journal of Commodity Markets
  • Central bank mandates: How differences can influence the content and tone of central bank communication, 2022, Journal of International Money and Finance
  • The impact of financialization on the efficiency of commodity futures markets, 2023, Journal of Commodity Markets

They have also been connected with research on topics such as futures contracts in specific markets, as evidenced by collaboration on the paper Does the tea market require a futures contract? Evidence from the Sri Lankan tea market (2020) published in Research in International Business and Finance.

Martin T. Bohl's body of work reflects an interdisciplinary approach by integrating analysis of financial market behavior with broader economic and policy considerations, encompassing both theoretical and applied perspectives.

Best Publications

  • German monetary unification and the stability of the German M3 money demand function

    Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee;Martin T Bohl

  • Institutional Traders’ Behavior in an Emerging Stock Market: Empirical Evidence on Polish Pension Fund Investors

    Svitlana Voronkova;Martin T. Bohl

  • The Gold Price in Times of Crisis

    Jędrzej Białkowski;Martin T. Bohl;Patrick M. Stephan;Tomasz P. Wisniewski

  • From Hero to Zero: Evidence of Performance Reversal and Speculative Bubbles in German Renewable Energy Stocks

    Martin T. Bohl;Philipp Kaufmann;Patrick M. Stephan

  • Price discovery and investor structure in stock index futures

    Martin T. Bohl;Christian A. Salm;Michael Schuppli

  • Trading volume and stock market volatility: The Polish case

    Martin T Bohl;Harald Henke

  • Together We Invest? Individual and Institutional Investors’ Trading Behaviour in Poland

    Christiane Goodfellow;Martin T. Bohl;Bartosz Gebka

  • Financial contagion vulnerability and resistance: A comparison of European stock markets

    Dobromił Serwa;Martin T. Bohl

  • European Stock Markets and the ECB's Monetary Policy Surprises*

    Martin T. Bohl;Pierre L. Siklos;David Sondermann

  • Empirical evidence on feedback trading in mature and emerging stock markets

    Martin T. Bohl;Pierre L. Siklos

  • Institutional investors and stock returns volatility: Empirical evidence from a natural experiment ☆

    Martin T. Bohl;Janusz Brzeszczyński;Bernd Wilfling

  • Do institutional investors destabilize stock prices? evidence from an emerging market

    Martin T. Bohl;Janusz Brzeszczyński

  • Periodically collapsing bubbles in the US stock market

    Martin T. Bohl

  • Do mutual fund managers exploit the Ramadan anomaly? Evidence from Turkey

    Jędrzej Białkowski;Martin T. Bohl;Philipp Kaufmann;Tomasz P. Wisniewski

  • Do Foreign Institutional Investors Destabilize China’s A-Share Markets?

    Michael Schuppli;Martin T. Bohl

  • Speculative bubbles in agricultural prices

    Philipp Adämmer;Martin T. Bohl

  • The present value model of U.S. stock prices redux: a new testing strategy and some evidence

    Martin T Bohl;Pierre L Siklos

  • Do central banks react to the stock market? The case of the Bundesbank.

    Martin T. Bohl;Pierre L. Siklos;Thomas Werner

  • Does Futures Speculation Destabilize Spot Prices? New Evidence for Commodity Markets

    Martin T. Bohl;Patrick M. Stephan

  • Empirical evidence on cross-listed stocks of Central and Eastern European companies

    Piotr Korczak;Martin T. Bohl

  • Challenges in Central Banking: The Current Institutional Environment And Forces Affecting Monetary Policy

    Pierre L. Siklos;Martin T. Bohl;Mark E. Wohar

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre L. Siklos
Pierre L. Siklos Wilfrid Laurier University
David G. Mayes
David G. Mayes University of Auckland
Mark E. Wohar
Mark E. Wohar University of Nebraska at Omaha
Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee
Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Christian Pierdzioch
Christian Pierdzioch Helmut Schmidt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Economics and Finance in the USA, it's valuable to consider related online degrees and career pathways that can enhance your expertise and marketability. Online programs offer flexibility for working professionals or those seeking a cost-effective, accelerated approach.

For example, today’s business landscape demands knowledge of digital trends. Earning an internet marketing and social media degree can open doors to analytics, branding, and e-commerce roles that complement your finance background.

If you’re interested in the service sector, a fastest online hospitality degree provides insights into business operations, leadership, and guest relations—skills that align closely with economics and management principles.

Those aiming for senior positions might pursue an aacsb accredited online mba programs for globally recognized business training. Alternatively, specializing with the cheapest online masters in human resources gives a strong foundation in talent management and organizational dynamics.

These options provide versatile credentials, allowing you to tailor your education to specific industries and career ambitions within the wider fields of economics and business.

Best Scientists Citing Martin T. Bohl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles