World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
56
Citations
14620
World Ranking
3472
National Ranking
1504

Todd E. Scheetz publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd E. Scheetz sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 195 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Todd E. Scheetz D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd E. Scheetz sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Todd E. Scheetz is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on ophthalmology, molecular biology, and related biomedical fields with a particular emphasis on retinal diseases and disorders.

The main fields of study for this scientist include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work contributes notably to several subfields such as Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, and Immunology.

Key topics frequently addressed in their research are:

  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies

Their recent publications include studies focused on single-cell RNA sequencing and retinal health, demonstrating a blend of molecular biology techniques and clinical relevance in ophthalmic research. Some notable papers are:

  • "Spectacle: An interactive resource for ocular single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis" (2020), Experimental Eye Research
  • "Bulk and single-cell gene expression analyses reveal aging human choriocapillaris has pro-inflammatory phenotype" (2020), Microvascular Research
  • "Single-cell RNA sequencing in vision research: Insights into human retinal health and disease" (2020), Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
  • "Choroidal endothelial and macrophage gene expression in atrophic and neovascular macular degeneration" (2022), Human Molecular Genetics
  • "Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in Human Retinal Degeneration Reveals Distinct Glial Cell Populations" (2020), Cells

Frequent coauthors in their collaborative work include Edwin M. Stone, Robert F. Mullins, John H. Fingert, Budd A. Tucker, and Andrew P. Voigt. These partnerships have contributed to building a comprehensive understanding of retinal diseases at the molecular and cellular levels.

The scientist has published multiple papers across renowned venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Molecular Genetics
  • JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Best Publications

  • Generation and initial analysis of more than 15,000 full-length human and mouse cDNA sequences.

    Robert L Strausberg;Elise A Feingold;Lynette H Grouse;Jeffery G Derge

  • The status, quality, and expansion of the NIH full-length cDNA project: The Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC)

    Daniela S. Gerhard;Lukas Wagner;Elise A. Feingold;Carolyn M. Shenmen

  • Homozygosity Mapping With SNP Arrays Identifies TRIM32, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase, as a Bardet-Biedl Syndrome Gene (BBS11)

    Annie P. Chiang;John S. Beck;Hsan Jan Yen;Marwan K. Tayeh

  • Clonal selection drives genetic divergence of metastatic medulloblastoma

    Xiaochong Wu;Paul A. Northcott;Adrian Dubuc;Adam J. Dupuy

  • An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge.

    Catherine A. Brownstein;Alan H. Beggs;Nils Homer;Barry Merriman

  • The air-liquid interface and use of primary cell cultures are important to recapitulate the transcriptional profile of in vivo airway epithelia

    Alejandro Antonio Pezzulo;Timothy D. Starner;Todd E. Scheetz;Geri L. Traver

  • Clinically Focused Molecular Investigation of 1000 Consecutive Families with Inherited Retinal Disease.

    Edwin M. Stone;Edwin M. Stone;Jeaneen L. Andorf;Jeaneen L. Andorf;S. Scott Whitmore;S. Scott Whitmore;Adam P. DeLuca;Adam P. DeLuca

  • Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing

    A. Eliot Shearer;Adam P. DeLuca;Michael S. Hildebrand;Kyle R. Taylor

  • A BBSome subunit links ciliogenesis, microtubule stability, and acetylation.

    Alexander V. Loktev;Qihong Zhang;John S. Beck;Charles C. Searby

  • Regulation of gene expression in the mammalian eye and its relevance to eye disease

    Todd E. Scheetz;Kwang Youn A Kim;Ruth E. Swiderski;Alisdair R. Philp

  • Single-cell transcriptomics of the human retinal pigment epithelium and choroid in health and macular degeneration.

    Andrew P. Voigt;Kelly Mulfaul;Kelly Mulfaul;Nathaniel K. Mullin;Nathaniel K. Mullin;Miles J. Flamme-Wiese;Miles J. Flamme-Wiese

  • Exome sequencing and analysis of induced pluripotent stem cells identify the cilia-related gene male germ cell-associated kinase (MAK) as a cause of retinitis pigmentosa

    Budd A. Tucker;Todd E. Scheetz;Robert F. Mullins;Adam P. DeLuca

  • Copy number variations on chromosome 12q14 in patients with normal tension glaucoma

    John H. Fingert;Alan L. Robin;Jennifer L. Stone;Ben R. Roos

  • Migration of the plastid genome to the nucleus in a peridinin dinoflagellate.

    Jeremiah D. Hackett;Hwan Su Yoon;M. Bento Soares;Maria F. Bonaldo

  • Insights into a dinoflagellate genome through expressed sequence tag analysis

    Jeremiah D Hackett;Todd E Scheetz;Hwan Su Yoon;Marcelo B Soares

  • Anopheles gambiae pilot gene discovery project: identification of mosquito innate immunity genes from expressed sequence tags generated from immune-competent cell lines.

    George Dimopoulos;Thomas L. Casavant;Shereen Chang;Todd Scheetz

  • Transcriptional patterns in both host and bacterium underlie a daily rhythm of anatomical and metabolic change in a beneficial symbiosis

    Andrew M. Wier;Andrew M. Wier;Spencer V. Nyholm;Mark J. Mandel;Mark J. Mandel;R. Prisca Massengo-Tiassé

  • A modified sleeping beauty transposon system that can be used to model a wide variety of human cancers in mice.

    Adam J. Dupuy;Laura M. Rogers;Jinsil Kim;Kishore Nannapaneni

  • Identifying Components of the NF-κB Pathway in the Beneficial Euprymna scolopes-Vibrio fischeri Light Organ Symbiosis

    Michael S. Goodson;Mila Kojadinovic;Joshua V. Troll;Todd E. Scheetz

  • Utilizing Ethnic-Specific Differences in Minor Allele Frequency to Recategorize Reported Pathogenic Deafness Variants

    A. Eliot Shearer;Robert W. Eppsteiner;Kevin T. Booth;Sean S. Ephraim

Frequent Co-Authors

Edwin M. Stone
Edwin M. Stone University of Iowa
Val C. Sheffield
Val C. Sheffield University of Iowa
John H. Fingert
John H. Fingert University of Iowa
Robert F. Mullins
Robert F. Mullins University of Iowa
Michael D. Abràmoff
Michael D. Abràmoff University of Iowa
Budd A. Tucker
Budd A. Tucker University of Iowa
Richard J.H. Smith
Richard J.H. Smith University of Iowa
Paul B. McCray
Paul B. McCray University of Iowa
Marcelo B. Soares
Marcelo B. Soares University of Illinois at Peoria
Abbot F. Clark
Abbot F. Clark University of North Texas Health Science Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA can open doors to a diverse range of healthcare and research careers. Many professionals choose to complement their genetics background with online degrees that can quickly advance their careers or help them pivot to new fields.

For those seeking flexibility, the online rn to bsn no clinicals programs allow nurses to further their education without traditional in-person requirements. If your interest leans toward advanced nursing, options like the 12 month dnp program online enable fast-tracked doctoral study in nursing.

Students considering entering the healthcare workforce quickly might explore a certified medical assistant program, which can often be completed in just a few weeks and provides essential clinical experience. Cost-conscious professionals aiming for leadership may prefer the cheapest msn to dnp programs to gain top credentials efficiently.

Whether your goal is research or direct patient care, these flexible and affordable online options can help you build on your genetics studies and expand your career opportunities in the growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Todd E. Scheetz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles