World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
56721
World Ranking
8743
National Ranking
4508

Elad I. Levy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elad I. Levy sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 847 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elad I. Levy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elad I. Levy sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elad I. Levy is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York, in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Internal Medicine. Within these fields, their work addresses various aspects of cerebrovascular and neurovascular disorders.

Their main areas of research include:

  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

Levy has contributed extensively to peer-reviewed journals, frequently publishing in:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Operative Neurosurgery
  • World Neurosurgery
  • Interventional Neuroradiology

Their recent publications cover clinical trials and multi-center experiences related to embolization techniques and stroke management, including:

  • "Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multi-Center Experience of 154 Consecutive Embolizations" (2020, Neurosurgery)
  • "Middle meningeal artery embolization treatment of nonacute subdural hematomas in the elderly: a multiinstitutional experience of 151 cases" (2020, Neurosurgical FOCUS)
  • "Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Predictors of Clinical and Radiographic Failure from 636 Embolizations" (2023, Radiology)
  • "Increased Perviousness on CT for Acute Ischemic Stroke is Associated with Fibrin/Platelet-Rich Clots" (2020, American Journal of Neuroradiology)
  • "Pivotal Trial of the Neuroform Atlas Stent for Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms" (2020, Stroke)

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Adnan H. Siddiqui
  • Jason M. Davies
  • Kenneth V. Snyder
  • Muhammad Waqas
  • Ammad A. Baig

Best Publications

  • Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials

    Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon;Wim H. van Zwam;Diederik W. J. Dippel

  • Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.

    Raul G. Nogueira;Ashutosh P. Jadhav;Diogo C. Haussen;Alain Bonafe

  • Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Alain Bonafe;Hans Christoph Diener

  • Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

    Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;Colin P. Derdeyn;Tanya N. Turan

  • Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial

    Jeffrey L Saver;Reza Jahan;Elad I Levy;Tudor G Jovin

  • Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial.

    Tibor Becske;David F. Kallmes;Isil Saatci;Cameron G. McDougall

  • Aggressive Medical Treatment With or Without Stenting in High-Risk Patients With Intracranial Artery Stenosis (Sammpris): The Final Results of a Randomised Trial

    Colin P. Derdeyn;Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;David Fiorella

  • Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture.

    Jianping Xiang;Sabareesh K. Natarajan;Markus Tremmel;Ding Ma

  • Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Bart M. Demaerschalk;Dawn O. Kleindorfer;Opeolu M. Adeoye;Andrew M. Demchuk

  • International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study

    David F. Kallmes;R. Hanel;D. Lopes;E. Boccardi

  • US Multicenter Experience With the Wingspan Stent System for the Treatment of Intracranial Atheromatous Disease Periprocedural Results

    David Fiorella;Elad I. Levy;Aquilla S. Turk;Felipe C. Albuquerque

  • Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial

    Aquilla S Turk;Adnan Siddiqui;Johanna T Fifi;Reade A De Leacy

  • Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial

    Tibor Becske;Waleed Brinjikji;Matthew B. Potts;David F. Kallmes

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal

    Christopher J. Kwolek;Michael R. Jaff;J. Ignacio Leal;L. Nelson Hopkins

  • Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia During Endovascular Therapy for Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke Preliminary Results From a Retrospective, Multicenter Study

    Alex Abou-Chebl;Ridwan Lin;Muhammad Shazam Hussain;Tudor G. Jovin

  • Panacea or problem: flow diverters in the treatment of symptomatic large or giant fusiform vertebrobasilar aneurysms: Clinical article

    Adnan H. Siddiqui;Adib A. Abla;Adib A. Abla;Peter Kan;Peter Kan;Travis M. Dumont;Travis M. Dumont

  • Long-term outcomes after meningioma radiosurgery: physician and patient perspectives.

    D Kondziolka;E I Levy;A Niranjan;J C Flickinger

  • Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management.

    Elad I. Levy;Elad I. Levy;Aquilla S. Turk;Felipe C. Albuquerque;David B. Niemann

  • Predictors of outcome in surgically managed patients with typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of results following microvascular decompression.

    Elizabeth C. Tyler-Kabara;Amin B. Kassam;Michael H. Horowitz;Louise Urgo

Frequent Co-Authors

Adnan H. Siddiqui
Adnan H. Siddiqui University at Buffalo, State University of New York
L. Nelson Hopkins
L. Nelson Hopkins University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Christopher S. Ogilvy
Christopher S. Ogilvy Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Reza Jahan
Reza Jahan University of California, Los Angeles
J Mocco
J Mocco Mount Sinai Hospital
David Fiorella
David Fiorella Stony Brook University
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Medicine in the USA is a popular path, there are several related online degrees that can open doors in healthcare and medical leadership. For those interested in healthcare administration, pursuing cahme-accredited online mha programs ensures you gain recognized management skills that stand out to employers.

Registered nurses looking to advance their qualifications can consider online rn to bsn no clinicals options. These programs allow nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing with more flexible formats, often without the need for in-person practicums.

For those seeking to reach the highest nursing credentials at a faster pace, short dnp programs offer fast-track pathways to a Doctor of Nursing Practice. There are also online dnp programs without clinicals available, streamlining the process for experienced professionals.

Exploring these online healthcare programs can provide alternative career routes beyond traditional medical degrees, fitting diverse goals and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Elad I. Levy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles