World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael D. Hill

Michael D. Hill

Award Badge
Medicine
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 134 2123 1977 79 75 950 81692

Michael D. Hill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael D. Hill between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael D. Hill published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 49.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 118 publications in 2024. 70 of the 1,326 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 118. Peak 118 publications in 2024. 2000: 16 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 33 publications 2005: 33 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 50 publications 2015: 62 publications 2016: 63 publications 2017: 58 publications 2018: 74 publications 2019: 72 publications 2020: 81 publications 2021: 88 publications 2022: 86 publications 2023: 99 publications 2024: 118 publications 2025: 69 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

1,326 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael D. Hill: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 16
2001 18
2002 17
2003 20
2004 33
2005 33
2006 31
2007 33
2008 33
2009 31
2010 33
2011 28
2012 32
2013 47
2014 50
2015 62
2016 63
2017 58
2018 74
2019 72
2020 81
2021 88
2022 86
2023 99
2024 118
2025 69
2026 1
Total 1,326
Download as CSV

Michael D. Hill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Hill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 941–960 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 950 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133 950
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael D. Hill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael D. Hill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 134–135 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 134 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163 134
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Michael D. Hill is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and has a significant body of research primarily in Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, notably Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Rehabilitation, and Internal Medicine.

Their research topics focus predominantly on acute and chronic cerebrovascular conditions and related therapeutic approaches. Specifically, these include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

Michael D. Hill has contributed to a number of research articles published in prominent journals. Select recent papers include:

  • "Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes," 2023, published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial," 2020, published in The Lancet
  • "Hypertension Canada's 2020 Comprehensive Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children," 2020, published in Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • "Intravenous tenecteplase compared with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in Canada (AcT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, registry-linked, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial," 2022, published in The Lancet
  • "Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke with established large infarct: multicentre, open-label, randomised trial," 2023, published in The Lancet

Their frequent co-authors include Mayank Goyal, Andrew M. Demchuk, Bijoy K. Menon, Johanna M. Ospel, and Mohammed Almekhlafi, indicating collaboration with experts in stroke and neurointerventional research.

Publications from Michael D. Hill are regularly found in several academic venues, including:

  • Stroke
  • Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
  • Neurology
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • International Journal of Stroke

In addition to journal articles, Michael D. Hill has contributed to published books, with records showing two works titled Exploring the World of Social Policy through Policy Press in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials

    Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon;Wim H. van Zwam;Diederik W. J. Dippel

  • Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis

    Thomas G. Brott;Thomas G. Brott;Robert W. Hobson;George Howard;Gary S. Roubin

  • Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Aad van der Lugt;Bijoy K. Menon

  • Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for Stroke

    Joseph P Broderick;Yuko Y Palesch;Andrew M Demchuk;Sharon D Yeatts

  • Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial

    Jörg Ederle;Joanna Dobson;Joanna Dobson;Roland L. Featherstone;Leo H. Bonati;Leo H. Bonati

  • Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison

    Julio A Chalela;Chelsea S Kidwell;Lauren M Nentwich;Marie Luby

  • Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

    Andrei V. Alexandrov;Andrei V. Alexandrov;Carlos A. Molina;James C. Grotta;Zsolt Garami

  • Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for Assessing CT Scans in Patients with Acute Stroke

    J. H. Warwick Pexman;Philip A. Barber;Michael D. Hill;Robert J. Sevick

  • Comparison of MRI and CT for Detection of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Chelsea S. Kidwell;Julio A. Chalela;Jeffrey L. Saver;Sidney Starkman

  • Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility.

    P. A. Barber;J. Zhang;A. M. Demchuk;M. D. Hill

  • Low Rates of Acute Recanalization With Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Ischemic Stroke. Real-World Experience and a Call for Action

    Rohit Bhatia;Michael D. Hill;Nandavar Shobha;Bijoy Menon

  • Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis

    Thomas G. Brott;George Howard;Gary S. Roubin;James F. Meschia

  • Coding of Stroke and Stroke Risk Factors Using International Classification of Diseases, Revisions 9 and 10

    Rae A. Kokotailo;Michael D. Hill

  • Fast assessment of stroke and transient ischaemic attack to prevent early recurrence (FASTER): a randomised controlled pilot trial

    James Kennedy;Michael D Hill;Karla J Ryckborst;Michael Eliasziw

  • Prediction of haematoma growth and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage using the CT-angiography spot sign (PREDICT): a prospective observational study.

    Andrew M Demchuk;Dar Dowlatshahi;David Rodriguez-Luna;Carlos A Molina

  • Hypertension Canada’s 2018 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children

    Kara A. Nerenberg;Kelly B. Zarnke;Alexander A. Leung;Kaberi Dasgupta

  • The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension.

    Kaberi Dasgupta;Robert R. Quinn;Kelly B. Zarnke;Doreen M. Rabi

  • The high risk of stroke immediately after transient ischemic attack: a population-based study.

    M. D. Hill;N. Yiannakoulias;T. Jeerakathil;J. V. Tu

  • Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: results of the Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study.

    Michael D. Hill;Alastair M. Buchan

  • Sex Differences in Stroke Care and Outcomes: Results From the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network

    Moira K. Kapral;Jiming Fang;Michael D. Hill;Frank Silver

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Bruce C.V. Campbell
Bruce C.V. Campbell Royal Melbourne Hospital
Alastair M. Buchan
Alastair M. Buchan University of Oxford
Eric E. Smith
Eric E. Smith University of Calgary
Charles B. L. M. Majoie
Charles B. L. M. Majoie University of Amsterdam
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Diederik W.J. Dippel
Diederik W.J. Dippel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Keith W. Muir
Keith W. Muir University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to becoming a doctor. There are numerous online degree options and career pathways that support the healthcare industry, many of which are flexible and affordable. For example, rhit programs online are ideal for those interested in health information management, offering students the ability to gain essential administrative and technology skills.

If you’re looking to work in medical administration, earning a medical coding certification online can open doors to roles in medical billing and coding, a rapidly growing field in healthcare. For those aspiring to become advanced practice nurses, the cheapest online fnp program options provide a way to study and qualify as a Family Nurse Practitioner without overwhelming financial burden.

Many also choose flexible online nursing programs that allow working professionals to balance their education and work life. Whether you aim to work in administration or direct patient care, these online degrees and certifications offer practical, affordable pathways into a variety of vital healthcare roles within the U.S. medical system.

Best Scientists Citing Michael D. Hill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles