World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
10891
World Ranking
5632
National Ranking
3067

Steven G. Rogelberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven G. Rogelberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steven G. Rogelberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven G. Rogelberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven G. Rogelberg is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on psychology, business management, and social sciences.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, Rogelberg specializes in several subfields such as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Communication

Their work addresses a range of topics that include:

  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Recent publications by Rogelberg include:

  • How we can bring I-O psychology science and evidence-based practices to the public, 2022, Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Other notable papers, though authored by frequent collaborators, relate to themes aligned with Rogelberg's research interests:

  • Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT, 2023, Human Resource Management Journal
  • Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science, 2020, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Does CWB repair negative affective states, or generate them? Examining the moderating role of trait empathy., 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • The Use and Misuse of Organizational Research Methods 'Best Practice' Articles, 2021, Organizational Research Methods

Rogelberg frequently collaborates with several researchers including:

  • Liana Kreamer
  • George C. Banks
  • Betsy H. Albritton
  • Jiajin Tong
  • Herman Aguinis

Their work has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • American Journal of Health Promotion
  • Cross-Cultural Research
  • Human Resource Management Journal

Best Publications

  • Introduction: Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Millennials at Work: What We Know and What We Need to Do (If Anything)

    Jennifer J. Deal;David G. Altman;Steven G. Rogelberg

  • "Not Another Meeting!" Are Meeting Time Demands Related to Employee Well-Being?

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Desmond J. Leach;Peter B. Warr;Jennifer L. Burnfield

  • Nonresponse to mailed surveys: A review and guide

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Alexandra Luong

  • Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology

    Steven G. Rogelberg

  • Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey.

    Steven G. Rogelberg;James M. Conway;Matthew E. Sederburg;Christiane Spitzmüller

  • Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Joseph A. Allen;Linda Shanock;Cliff Scott

  • The Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Roni Reiter-Palmon

  • Using Internet/Intranet Web Pages to Collect Organizational Research Data:

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;Steven G. Rogelberg

  • Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Gender diversity, team decision quality, time on task, and interpersonal cohesion

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Steven M. Rumery

  • Employee attitude surveys: examining the attitudes of noncompliant employees.

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Alexandra Luong;Matthew E. Sederburg;Dean S. Cristol

  • Perceived Meeting Effectiveness: The Role of Design Characteristics

    Desmond J. Leach;Steven G. Rogelberg;Peter B. Warr;Jennifer L. Burnfield

  • Meetings and More Meetings: The Relationship Between Meeting Load and the Daily Well-Being of Employees.

    Alexandra Luong;Steven G. Rogelberg

  • Attitudes toward Surveys: Development of a Measure and Its Relationship to Respondent Behavior

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Gwenith G. Fisher;Douglas C. Maynard;Milton D. Hakel

  • Meeting Design Characteristics and Attendee Perceptions of Staff/Team Meeting Quality

    Melissa A. Cohen;Steven G. Rogelberg;Joseph A. Allen;Alexandra Luong

  • The Caring‐Killing Paradox: Euthanasia‐Related Strain Among Animal‐Shelter Workers

    Charlie L. Reeve;Steven G. Rogelberg;Christiane Spitzmüller;Natalie Digiacomo

  • Selection in Teams: An Exploration of the Teamwork Knowledge, Skills, and Ability Test

    Anita C. McClough;Steven G. Rogelberg

  • The Science and Fiction of Meetings

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Cliff Scott;John Kello

  • Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    George C. Banks;Steven G. Rogelberg;Haley M. Woznyj;Ronald S. Landis

  • The Stepladder Technique: An Alternative Group Structure Facilitating Effective Group Decision Making

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;Charles A. Lowe

  • Manager-Led Group Meetings: A Context for Promoting Employee Engagement

    Joseph A. Allen;Steven G. Rogelberg

  • Team Autonomy, Performance, and Member Job Strain: Uncovering the Teamwork KSA Link

    Desmond J. Leach;Toby D. Wall;Steven G. Rogelberg;Paul R. Jackson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald S. Landis
Ronald S. Landis Illinois Institute of Technology
Deborah E. Rupp
Deborah E. Rupp George Mason University
Eden B. King
Eden B. King Rice University
Jeffrey M. Stanton
Jeffrey M. Stanton Syracuse University
Bojan Cukic
Bojan Cukic University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Frederick L. Oswald
Frederick L. Oswald Rice University
Charlie L. Reeve
Charlie L. Reeve University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Mary Lou Maher
Mary Lou Maher University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Bennett J. Tepper
Bennett J. Tepper The Ohio State University
Peter Warr
Peter Warr University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online programs and specialized career paths in the United States. Whether you’re interested in clinical work, counseling, research, or organizational psychology, accredited online degrees provide the flexibility to balance your studies with other commitments.

For those looking to become a licensed therapist, requirements can differ significantly by state and even by city. It’s important to research educational prerequisites, supervised clinical experience, and licensing exams specific to your location. For example, you can review the licensed therapist requirements in Houston or explore guidance on how to become a licensed therapist in Huntsville.

Each region has its unique pathway. As you plan your future, consider insights on becoming a licensed therapist in Indianapolis or review the Irvine licensed therapist education requirements. Thorough preparation will ensure you meet all necessary standards for licensure and set yourself up for success in the growing field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Steven G. Rogelberg

Trending Scientists