World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 35 2192 2061 70 68 189 6083

Rainer Harms publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rainer Harms between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rainer Harms published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2010. 10 of the 206 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2010. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
2000 2025

206 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rainer Harms: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 5
2008 10
2009 16
2010 27
2011 11
2012 10
2013 7
2014 12
2015 15
2016 11
2017 14
2018 12
2019 10
2020 7
2021 10
2022 2
2023 7
2024 4
2025 6
Total 206
Download as CSV

Rainer Harms publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rainer Harms sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 185–189 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 189 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59 189
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Rainer Harms D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rainer Harms sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124 35
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Rainer Harms is affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands, focusing research primarily within the field of Business, Management and Accounting, where they have contributed to 42 publications. Their work spans several subfields including Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science, Business and International Management, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their research addresses diverse topics such as Innovation and Knowledge Management, Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, Innovation and Socioeconomic Development, Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research, Creativity in Education and Neuroscience, International Business and Foreign Direct Investment, and Firm Innovation and Growth.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Rainer Harms include:

  • Effectuation and causation configurations for business model innovation: Addressing COVID-19 in the gastronomy industry (2021) published in the International Journal of Hospitality Management

While not a sole author, they are frequently associated with research in venues that include the International Journal of Hospitality Management, Small Business Economics, Journal of Small Business Management, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, and Journal of Business Venturing Insights.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rainer Harms include:

  • Holger Schiele
  • Juliano Afonso Tessaro
  • Isabella Hatak
  • Arend J. Groen
  • Matthias Fink

Publications involving Rainer Harms appear regularly in journal outlets such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Small Business Economics
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • International Journal of Innovation Management
  • International Journal of Hospitality Management

Best Publications

  • The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial intention of students in science and engineering versus business studies university programs

    Daniela Maresch;Rainer Harms;Norbert Kailer;Birgit Wimmer-Wurm

  • Entrepreneurial marketing: moving beyond marketing in new ventures

    Sascha Kraus;Rainer Harms;Matthias Fink

  • Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process

    Rainer Harms;Holger Schiele

  • The Relationship between Transformational Leadership, Product Innovation and Performancein SMEs

    Kurt Matzler;Erich Schwarz;Natasa Deutinger;Rainer Harms

  • Strategic planning in smaller enterprises – new empirical findings

    Sascha Kraus;Rainer Harms;Erich J. Schwarz

  • Age, job identification, and entrepreneurial intention

    Isabella Hatak;Rainer Harms;Matthias Fink

  • Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: Learning in a lean startup environment

    Rainer Harms

  • Does e-HRM lead to better HRM service?

    Tanya Bondarouk;Rainer Harms;David Lepak

  • Family firm research: sketching a research field

    Sascha Kraus;Rainer Harms;Matthias Fink

  • The suitability of the configuration approach in entrepreneurship research

    Rainer Harms;Sascha Kraus;Erich Schwarz

  • Willingness to pay for eco-certified refurbished products: the effects of environmental attitudes and knowledge

    Rainer Harms;Jonathan D. Linton

  • Knowledge management and coopetition: How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge?

    Johanna Gast;Katherine Gundolf;Rainer Harms;Elvin Matos Collado

  • Effective entrepreneurial marketing on Facebook – A longitudinal study

    Matthias Fink;Matthias Fink;Monika Koller;Johannes Gartner;Arne Floh;Arne Floh

  • Cooperative internationalization of SMEs: Self-commitment as a success factor for International Entrepreneurship

    Matthias Fink;Rainer Harms;Sascha Kraus

  • On the motivational drivers of gray entrepreneurship: an exploratory study

    Rainer Harms;Florian Luck;Sascha Kraus;Steven Thomas Walsh;Steven Thomas Walsh

  • Structuring the Technology Entrepreneurship publication landscape: Making sense out of chaos

    Tiago Ratinho;Rainer Harms;Steven Thomas Walsh;Steven Thomas Walsh

  • Antecedents of innovation and growth: analysing the impact of entrepreneurial orientation and goal-oriented management

    Rainer Harms;Carl Henning Reschke;Sascha Kraus;Matthias Fink

  • Strategic business planning and success in small firms

    Sascha Kraus;Rainer Harms;Erich Schwarz

  • Family Firm Configurations for High Performance: The Role of Entrepreneurship and Ambidexterity

    Mathew Hughes;Matthias Filser;Rainer Harms;Sascha Kraus

  • Effectuation and causation configurations for business model innovation: Addressing COVID-19 in the gastronomy industry

    Rainer Harms;Carina Alfert;Cheng Feng Cheng;Sascha Kraus

  • Configurations of new ventures in entrepreneurship research: contributions and research gaps

    Rainer Harms;Sascha Kraus;Carl H. Reschke

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Fink
Matthias Fink Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Sascha Kraus
Sascha Kraus University of Siegen
Steven T. Walsh
Steven T. Walsh University of New Mexico
Holger Schiele
Holger Schiele University of Twente
David P. Lepak
David P. Lepak University of Massachusetts Amherst
Mathew Hughes
Mathew Hughes University of Leicester
Jonathan D. Linton
Jonathan D. Linton University of Sheffield
Kurt Matzler
Kurt Matzler University of Innsbruck
Bruce T. Milne
Bruce T. Milne University of New Mexico
Karen I. van der Zee
Karen I. van der Zee Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Business and Management in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree pathways, each offering unique career opportunities. Many students consider a health care administration degree online, which offers flexibility and prepares you for leadership roles in the growing healthcare sector. Affordable programs make it easier for working professionals and career changers to upskill without significant financial strain.

For those wanting to advance quickly, choosing an affordable master's program for administration healthcare can provide specialized knowledge and increase your earning potential. If finance is your area of interest, contemplating an accounting degree online cost is a smart step toward becoming a CPA, auditor, or financial analyst, with many universities now offering budget-friendly online options.

Finally, technology-savvy students may be drawn to emerging fields like artificial intelligence. With the rising demand for AI professionals, enrolling in one of the top ai degree programs online positions you for innovative and high-growth careers.

Best Scientists Citing Rainer Harms

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles