World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10304 9646 587 573 96 3587

Kimberley M. Mallan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kimberley M. Mallan between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kimberley M. Mallan published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2014. 5 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2014. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
2004 2025

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kimberley M. Mallan: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 2
2007 3
2008 2
2009 2
2010 2
2011 5
2012 7
2013 9
2014 21
2015 11
2016 8
2017 6
2018 9
2019 7
2020 6
2021 4
2022 2
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 113
Download as CSV

Kimberley M. Mallan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberley M. Mallan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 96
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kimberley M. Mallan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberley M. Mallan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kimberley M. Mallan is affiliated with the Australian Catholic University in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine and psychology with a notable emphasis on public health, environmental and occupational health, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, epidemiology, and applied psychology.

Mallan's scholarly work addresses various aspects of nutrition, feeding behaviors, and health in children. The main topics of their research include obesity, physical activity, diet, child nutrition and feeding issues, eating disorders and behaviors, breastfeeding practices and influences, telemedicine and telehealth implementation, digital mental health interventions, and attachment and relationship dynamics.

Frequent publication venues for Mallan comprise Appetite, Research Square, Australian Psychologist, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, and Childhood Obesity.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Attitudes of Australian psychologists towards the delivery of therapy via video conferencing technology, 2020, Australian Psychologist
  • Non-responsive feeding practices mediate the relationship between maternal and child obesogenic eating behaviours, 2020, Appetite
  • Comparison of Early Feeding Practices in Mother-Father Dyads and Possible Generalization of an Efficacious Maternal Intervention to Fathers' Feeding Practices: A Secondary Analysis, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • The correlation between different operationalisations of parental restrictive feeding practices and children's eating behaviours: Systematic review and meta-analyses, 2022, Appetite
  • Associations between appetitive traits, dietary patterns and weight status of children attending the School Kids Intervention Program, 2020, Nutrition and Health

Mallan has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Elena Jansen, Rebecca Byrne, Lynne Daniels, Anna Say, and Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of an intervention to promote protective infant feeding practices to prevent childhood obesity: outcomes of the NOURISH RCT at 14 months of age and 6 months post the first of two intervention modules

    Lynne Daniels;Kimberley Mallan;Diana Battistutta;Jan Nicholson

  • Toddlers' food preferences. The impact of novel food exposure, maternal preferences and food neophobia

    Anika J. Howard;Kimberley M. Mallan;Rebecca Byrne;Anthea Magarey

  • Outcomes of an Early Feeding Practices Intervention to Prevent Childhood Obesity

    Lynne Allison Daniels;Kimberley Margaret Mallan;Jan Maree Nicholson;Diana Battistutta

  • Mealtime Structure and Responsive Feeding Practices Are Associated With Less Food Fussiness and More Food Enjoyment in Children.

    Julia M. Finnane;Elena Jansen;Kimberley M. Mallan;Lynne A. Daniels

  • The feeding practices and structure questionnaire: construction and initial validation in a sample of Australian first-time mothers and their 2-year olds

    Elena Jansen;Kimberley M Mallan;Jan M Nicholson;Lynne A Daniels;Lynne A Daniels

  • Child eating behavior outcomes of an early feeding intervention to reduce risk indicators for child obesity: The NOURISH RCT

    Lynne Allison Daniels;Lynne Allison Daniels;Kimberley Margaret Mallan;Diana Battistutta;Jan Maree Nicholson

  • The role of fathers in child feeding: perceived responsibility and predictors of participation

    Kimberley Mallan;Michaela Nothard;Karen Thorpe;Jan Nicholson

  • Food neophobia and its association with diet quality and weight in children aged 24 months: a cross sectional study

    Rebecca A Perry;Kimberley M Mallan;Jasly Koo;Chelsea E Mauch

  • Bidirectional associations between mothers’ feeding practices and child eating behaviours

    Elena Jansen;Kate Nicole Williams;Kimberley M. Mallan;Jan M. Nicholson

  • Maternal report of young children’s eating styles. Validation of the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire in three ethnically diverse Australian samples

    Kimberley M Mallan;W Liu;R J Mehta;Lynne Allison Daniels;Lynne Allison Daniels

  • Contemporary Research on Parenting: Conceptual, Methodological, and Translational Issues

    Thomas G. Power;Ester F C Sleddens;Jerica Berge;Lauren Connell

  • Associations between infant temperament and early feeding practices. A cross-sectional study of Australian mother-infant dyads from the NOURISH randomised controlled trial.

    S McMeekin;E Jansen;Kimberley M Mallan;Jan M Nicholson

  • The relationship between appetite and food preferences in British and Australian children.

    Alison Fildes;Alison Fildes;Alison Fildes;Kimberley M Mallan;Kimberley M Mallan;Lucy Cooke;Cornelia H M van Jaarsveld;Cornelia H M van Jaarsveld

  • Maternal feeding practices and fussy eating in toddlerhood: a discordant twin analysis

    Holly A. Harris;Holly A. Harris;Alison Fildes;Kimberley M. Mallan;Kimberley M. Mallan;Clare H. Llewellyn

  • The timing of solid introduction in an 'obesogenic' environment: a narrative review of the evidence and methodological issues.

    Lynne Daniels;Kimberley M. Mallan;Alison Fildes;Alison Fildes;Jacinda Wilson

  • Satiety responsiveness in toddlerhood predicts energy intake and weight status at four years of age

    Kimberley M. Mallan;Smita Nambiar;Anthea M. Magarey;Lynne A. Daniels

  • Recruiting and engaging new mothers in nutrition research studies: lessons from the Australian NOURISH randomised controlled trial.

    Lynne Allison Daniels;Lynne Allison Daniels;Jacinda L Wilson;Kimberley M Mallan;Seema Mihrshahi

  • Appetitive traits associated with higher and lower body mass index: evaluating the validity of the adult eating behaviour questionnaire in an Australian sample

    Kimberley M. Mallan;Kimberley M. Mallan;Alison Fildes;Alison Fildes;Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia;Jayne Drzezdzon

  • Child dietary and eating behavior outcomes up to 3.5 years after an early feeding intervention: The NOURISH RCT

    Anthea Magarey;Chelsea Mauch;Kimberley Mallan;Kimberley Mallan;Rebecca Perry

  • The Feeding Practices and Structure Questionnaire (FPSQ-28): A parsimonious version validated for longitudinal use from 2 to 5 years.

    Elena Jansen;Kate E. Williams;Kimberley M. Mallan;Kimberley M. Mallan;Jan M. Nicholson;Jan M. Nicholson

  • Slithering snakes, angry men and out-group members : what and whom are we evolved to fear?

    Kimberley M. Mallan;Ottmar V. Lipp;Benjamin Cochrane

  • The Feeding Practices and Structure Questionnaire (FPSQ-28): A parsimonious version validated for longitudinal use from 2-5 years

    Elena Jansen;Kate Elizabeth Williams;Kimberley M. Mallan;Jan Nicholson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan M. Nicholson
Jan M. Nicholson La Trobe University
Ottmar V. Lipp
Ottmar V. Lipp Curtin University
Karen Thorpe
Karen Thorpe University of Queensland
Deborah J. Terry
Deborah J. Terry University of Queensland
Jordana K. Bayer
Jordana K. Bayer La Trobe University
Clare E. Collins
Clare E. Collins University of Newcastle Australia
Jerica M. Berge
Jerica M. Berge University of Minnesota
Thomas G. Power
Thomas G. Power Washington State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens a variety of online education and career pathways, allowing you to specialize and adapt your professional journey. Many students pursue advanced credentials such as Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification, which can enhance job opportunities in clinical, educational, or research settings.

BCBA certification requires specific coursework, supervised experience, and passing an examination, with requirements varying by state. For example, those interested in becoming a bcba in Washington must follow clear state guidelines regarding education and supervision. Similarly, the process for how to become a bcba in West Virginia includes meeting local requirements and potentially completing additional licensure steps.

Understanding bcba certification requirements in Wisconsin or exploring Wyoming bcba education requirements can help you decide which academic programs align with your career goals. Be sure to research your state’s expectations and select accredited online programs that prepare you for certification, practica, and successful employment after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Kimberley M. Mallan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles