World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7239 6750 3916 3560 186 8142

Katherine L. Rosenblum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katherine L. Rosenblum between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katherine L. Rosenblum published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2018. 24 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2018. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 13 publications
1997 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katherine L. Rosenblum: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 4
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 1
2008 3
2009 2
2010 2
2011 7
2012 5
2013 4
2014 13
2015 17
2016 24
2017 19
2018 27
2019 9
2020 18
2021 12
2022 13
2023 17
2024 11
2025 13
Total 231
Download as CSV

Katherine L. Rosenblum publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine L. Rosenblum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 186
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Katherine L. Rosenblum D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine L. Rosenblum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Katherine L. Rosenblum is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Education, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Katherine L. Rosenblum has contributed to several academic journals. The frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Appetite
  • Infant Mental Health Journal
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

Notable recent papers authored by Rosenblum are:

  • Community-delivered infant-parent psychotherapy improves maternal sensitive caregiving: Evaluation of the Michigan model of infant mental health home visiting, 2020, Infant Mental Health Journal
  • Characteristics of eating behavior profiles among preschoolers with low-income backgrounds: a person-centered analysis, 2022, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Infant Mental Health Home Visiting Mitigates Impact of Maternal Adverse Childhood Experiences on Toddler Language Competence: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
  • Potential Neural Mediators of Mom Power Parenting Intervention Effects on Maternal Intersubjectivity and Stress Resilience, 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Infant mental health home visiting: intervention dosage and therapist experience interact to support improvements in maternal reflective functioning, 2021, Attachment & Human Development

Collaborations form an important aspect of Rosenblum's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Maria Muzik
  • Alison L. Miller
  • Jennifer M. Jester
  • Holly E. Brophy-Herb
  • Jessica Riggs

Best Publications

  • Changes in materialism, changes in psychological well-being: Evidence from three longitudinal studies and an intervention experiment.

    Tim Kasser;Katherine L. Rosenblum;Arnold J. Sameroff;Edward L. Deci

  • Mother-infant Bonding Impairment Across the First 6 Months Postpartum: The Primacy of Psychopathology in Women With Childhood Abuse and Neglect Histories

    Maria Muzik;Erika London Bocknek;Amanda Broderick;Patricia Richardson

  • Maternal mobile device use during a structured parent-child interaction task.

    Jenny Radesky;Alison L. Miller;Katherine L. Rosenblum;Danielle Appugliese

  • Psychosocial Constraints on the Development of Resilience

    Arnold J. Sameroff;Katherine L. Rosenblum

  • Maternal reflective functioning among mothers with childhood maltreatment histories: links to sensitive parenting and infant attachment security

    Ann M. Stacks;Maria Muzik;Kristyn Wong;Marjorie Beeghly

  • Reflection in thought and action: Maternal parenting reflectivity predicts mind-minded comments and interactive behavior.

    Katherine Lisa Rosenblum;Susan C. McDonough;Arnold J. Sameroff;Maria Muzik

  • Mom Power: preliminary outcomes of a group intervention to improve mental health and parenting among high-risk mothers

    Maria Muzik;Katherine L. Rosenblum;Emily A. Alfafara;Melisa M. Schuster

  • Interpersonal psychotherapy adapted for the group setting in the treatment of postpartum depression.

    Claudia M. Klier;Maria Muzik;Katherine L. Rosenblum;Gerhard Lenz

  • Maternal representations of the infant: associations with infant response to the still face.

    Katherine L. Rosenblum;Susan McDonough;Maria Muzik;Alison Miller

  • Enhancing breastfeeding rates among African American women: a systematic review of current psychosocial interventions.

    Angela Johnson;Rosalind Kirk;Katherine Lisa Rosenblum;Maria Muzik

  • Mindfulness yoga during pregnancy for psychiatrically at-risk women: preliminary results from a pilot feasibility study.

    Maria Muzik;Susan E. Hamilton;Katherine Lisa Rosenblum;Ellen Waxler

  • The roles of resilience and childhood trauma history: main and moderating effects on postpartum maternal mental health and functioning.

    Minden B. Sexton;Lindsay Hamilton;Ellen W. McGinnis;Katherine L. Rosenblum

  • Treating parent--infant relationship problems : strategies for intervention

    Arnold J. Sameroff;Susan C. McDonough;Katherine L. Rosenblum

  • Maternal parenting predicts infant biobehavioral regulation among women with a history of childhood maltreatment.

    Cecilia Martinez-Torteya;Carolyn J. Dayton;Marjorie Beeghly;Julia S. Seng

  • Infant social and emotional development: Emerging competence in a relational context.

    Katherine L. Rosenblum;Carolyn J. Dayton;Maria Muzik

  • The effects of domestic violence on the stability of attachment from infancy to preschool.

    Alytia A. Levendosky;G. Anne Bogat;Alissa C. Huth-Bocks;Katherine Lisa Rosenblum

  • Emotion Regulation in Context: Situational Effects on Infant and Caregiver Behavior

    Alison L. Miller;Susan C. McDonough;Katherine L. Rosenblum;Arnold J. Sameroff

  • Parent-child intervention decreases stress and increases maternal brain activity and connectivity during own baby-cry: An exploratory study.

    James E Swain;S. Shaun Ho;Katherine L. Rosenblum;Diana M. Morelen

  • Psychopathology and parenting: An examination of perceived and observed parenting in mothers with depression and PTSD

    Maria Muzik;Diana Morelen;Jessica Hruschak;Katherine Lisa Rosenblum

  • Diurnal cortisol pattern, eating behaviors and overweight in low-income preschool-aged children.

    Julie C. Lumeng;Alison L. Miller;Karen E. Peterson;Niko Kaciroti

  • Are commonly used self-report inventories suitable for screening postpartum depression and anxiety disorders?

    Maria Muzik;Maria Muzik;Claudia M. Klier;Katherine Lisa Rosenblum;A. Holzinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Muzik
Maria Muzik University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alison L. Miller
Alison L. Miller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Julie C. Lumeng
Julie C. Lumeng University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Arnold J. Sameroff
Arnold J. Sameroff University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kate D. Fitzgerald
Kate D. Fitzgerald Columbia University
Karen E. Peterson
Karen E. Peterson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Marjorie Beeghly
Marjorie Beeghly Wayne State University
Nestor L. Lopez-Duran
Nestor L. Lopez-Duran University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James E. Swain
James E. Swain Stony Brook University
Jason S. Moser
Jason S. Moser Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a range of related online degrees and rewarding career avenues, particularly in social work. Social workers play a vital role in improving community well-being and require specialized education and credentials, which can vary widely depending on location.

For example, those interested in becoming a social worker in Texas must meet specific educational and licensing requirements. Similarly, if you're curious about Utah social work education requirements, you’ll find unique pathways and certifications tailored to that state.

The requirements to be a social worker in Vermont also differ, often emphasizing supervised work experience and state exams. Meanwhile, the requirements to be a social worker in Virginia highlight rigorous academic programs and licensing procedures.

Many accredited universities now offer online programs in psychology and social work, providing flexibility for working adults and students nationwide. Carefully review your state’s requirements to ensure your chosen pathway aligns with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine L. Rosenblum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles