World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10633 9954 5568 5083 83 3903

Nestor L. Lopez-Duran publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nestor L. Lopez-Duran between 2009 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nestor L. Lopez-Duran published across 16 years, from 2009 to 2024, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2020. 7 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2020. 2009: 7 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications
2009 2024

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nestor L. Lopez-Duran: publications per year, 2009 to 2024
Year Publications
2009 7
2010 1
2011 2
2012 6
2013 1
2014 6
2015 6
2016 4
2017 7
2018 6
2019 11
2020 14
2021 5
2022 4
2023 5
2024 2
Total 87
Download as CSV

Nestor L. Lopez-Duran publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nestor L. Lopez-Duran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nestor L. Lopez-Duran D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nestor L. Lopez-Duran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nestor L. Lopez-Duran is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas spanning psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with a concentration on clinical and cognitive neuroscience subfields.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, functional brain connectivity studies, and advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications. Additional main topics of their work include stress responses and cortisol, mental health research, child abuse and trauma, and psychopathy and forensic psychiatry.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nestor L. Lopez-Duran include Colter Mitchell, Luke W. Hyde, Christopher S. Monk, Leigh G. Goetschius, and Vonnie C. McLoyd.

Publishing consistently in key venues, their work appears most often in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, with additional contributions to Psychoneuroendocrinology, JAMA Network Open, and Clinical Psychological Science.

  • Childhood violence exposure and social deprivation are linked to adolescent threat and reward neural function, 2020, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • Association of Childhood Violence Exposure With Adolescent Neural Network Density, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Childhood violence exposure and social deprivation predict adolescent amygdala-orbitofrontal cortex white matter connectivity, 2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clarifying the Link Between Amygdala Functioning During Emotion Processing and Antisocial Behaviors Versus Callous-Unemotional Traits Within a Population-Based Community Sample, 2020, Clinical Psychological Science
  • The roles of comorbidity and trauma exposure and its timing in shaping HPA axis patterns in depression, 2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology

Their work in clinical psychology encompasses the study of developmental psychological processes and brain function, especially under conditions of trauma and adversity experienced in childhood. This includes investigating neural connectivity patterns and stress-related neuroendocrine responses.

Within neuroscience, their research has utilized advanced neuroimaging methods to better understand brain networks involved in emotional and behavioral regulation during adolescence.

Medicine-related research by Lopez-Duran integrates psychoneuroendocrinology to explore how trauma and comorbid conditions interact to influence hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis functioning in depressive disorders.

Research topics consistently emphasize the neural and psychosocial consequences of childhood adversity, with implications spanning behavioral neuroscience and experimental cognitive psychology.

Best Publications

  • Hypothalamic―pituitary―adrenal axis dysregulation in depressed children and adolescents: A meta-analysis

    Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Maria Kovacs;Charles J. George

  • Individual differences in the development of early peer aggression: Integrating contributions of self-regulation, theory of mind, and parenting

    Sheryl L. Olson;Nestor Lopez-Duran;Erika S. Lunkenheimer;Hyein Chang

  • Differential associations between childhood trauma subtypes and adolescent HPA-axis functioning

    Kate R. Kuhlman;Elisa G. Geiss;Ivan Vargas;Nestor L. Lopez-Duran

  • Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal Axis Functioning in Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Children

    Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Sheryl L. Olson;Nastassia J. Hajal;Barbara T. Felt

  • Chronic stress, hair cortisol and depression: A prospective and longitudinal study of medical internship.

    Stefanie E. Mayer;Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Srijan Sen;James L. Abelson

  • Prodromal symptoms and atypical affectivity as predictors of major depression in juveniles: implications for prevention

    Maria Kovacs;Nestor Lopez-Duran

  • Facebook use and depressive symptomatology

    Teague E. Simoncic;Kate R. Kuhlman;Ivan Vargas;Sean Houchins

  • Developmental trajectories of positive and negative affect in children at high and low familial risk for depressive disorder

    Thomas M. Olino;Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Maria Kovacs;Charles J. George

  • Brief cognitive intervention can modulate neuroendocrine stress responses to the Trier Social Stress Test: Buffering effects of a compassionate goal orientation

    James L. Abelson;Thane M. Erickson;Stefanie E. Mayer;Jennifer Crocker

  • Frontal EEG asymmetry moderates the effects of stressful life events on internalizing symptoms in children at familial risk for depression

    Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Robin Nusslock;Charles George;Maria Kovacs

  • Giving Voice to Vulnerable Children: Machine Learning Analysis of Speech Detects Anxiety and Depression in Early Childhood

    Ellen W. McGinnis;Steven P. Anderau;Jessica Hruschak;Reed D. Gurchiek

  • Developmental influences on stress response systems: Implications for psychopathology vulnerability in adolescence.

    Andrea G. Roberts;Nestor L. Lopez-Duran

  • Stress sensitivity and stress sensitization in psychopathology: an introduction to the special section.

    Kate L. Harkness;Elizabeth P. Hayden;Nestor L. Lopez-Duran

  • Modeling neuroendocrine stress reactivity in salivary cortisol: adjusting for peak latency variability.

    Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Stefanie E. Mayer;James L. Abelson

  • Facial emotion expression recognition by children at familial risk for depression: high‐risk boys are oversensitive to sadness

    Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Kate R. Kuhlman;Charles George;Maria Kovacs

  • Age of Trauma Onset and HPA Axis Dysregulation Among Trauma-Exposed Youth.

    Kate Ryan Kuhlman;Ivan Vargas;Elisa G. Geiss;Nestor L. Lopez-Duran

  • Dissecting the impact of sleep and stress on the cortisol awakening response in young adults

    Ivan Vargas;Nestor Lopez-Duran

  • HPA-axis stress reactivity in youth depression: evidence of impaired regulatory processes in depressed boys.

    Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Ellen McGinnis;Kate Kuhlman;Elisa Geiss

  • Individual differences in cortisol responses to fear and frustration during middle childhood.

    Nestor L. Lopez-Duran;Nastassia J. Hajal;Sheryl L. Olson;Barbara T. Felt

  • Rapid detection of internalizing diagnosis in young children enabled by wearable sensors and machine learning.

    Ryan S. McGinnis;Ellen W. McGinnis;Jessica Hruschak;Nestor L. Lopez-Duran

Frequent Co-Authors

Luke W. Hyde
Luke W. Hyde University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher S. Monk
Christopher S. Monk University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Maria Kovacs
Maria Kovacs University of Pittsburgh
James L. Abelson
James L. Abelson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Maria Muzik
Maria Muzik University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Katherine L. Rosenblum
Katherine L. Rosenblum University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kate D. Fitzgerald
Kate D. Fitzgerald Columbia University
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Jeanne Brooks-Gunn Columbia University
Sara McLanahan
Sara McLanahan Princeton University
Sheryl L. Olson
Sheryl L. Olson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways, including the role of a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). The requirements for becoming an MFT can vary by state and city, so it is important to understand the specific educational and licensing criteria in your desired location.

For example, if you are interested in working on the West Coast, you can learn about Santa Ana mft education requirements or check the how to become an mft in Seattle page for guidelines in Washington state. For those looking towards Arizona, the mft requirements in Scottsdale provide details on education and clinical experience.

Thinking about opportunities in the Pacific Northwest? Explore the mft requirements in Spokane for another perspective on licensing and degree requirements.

Online degrees in psychology or counseling can help you begin this journey, offering flexibility and access to accredited programs. Always ensure your chosen degree aligns with state licensing requirements for greater career mobility and success.

Best Scientists Citing Nestor L. Lopez-Duran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles