World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kate D. Fitzgerald

Kate D. Fitzgerald

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
7700
World Ranking
6475
National Ranking
2814

Kate D. Fitzgerald publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate D. Fitzgerald sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 126 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kate D. Fitzgerald D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate D. Fitzgerald sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kate D. Fitzgerald is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a significant focus on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. They have contributed extensively to studies related to psychiatry and mental health, as well as education.

Their main topics of investigation include obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder research, functional brain connectivity studies, and early childhood education and development.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Kate D. Fitzgerald include:

  • Christopher S. Monk
  • Hannah Becker
  • Yanni Liu
  • Emily L. Bilek
  • Katherine L. Rosenblum

Their research contributions have appeared in multiple publication venues, with repeated publications in:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Implementation Science

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Fitzgerald include:

  • "Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders" (2020), published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups" (2020), published in American Journal of Psychiatry
  • "An overview of the first 5 years of the ENIGMA obsessive-compulsive disorder working group: The power of worldwide collaboration" (2020), published in Human Brain Mapping
  • "Structural neuroimaging biomarkers for obsessive-compulsive disorder in the ENIGMA-OCD consortium: medication matters" (2020), published in Translational Psychiatry
  • "Cognitive Control in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive and Anxiety Disorders: Brain-Behavioral Targets for Early Intervention" (2020), published in Biological Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Error-related hyperactivity of the anterior cingulate cortex in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Kate Dimond Fitzgerald;Robert C. Welsh;William J. Gehring;James L. Abelson

  • Decrease in caudate glutamatergic concentrations in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder patients taking paroxetine.

    David R. Rosenberg;Frank P. MacMASTER;Matcheri S. Keshavan;Kate D. Fitzgerald

  • Distinct Subcortical Volume Alterations in Pediatric and Adult OCD: A Worldwide Meta- and Mega-Analysis.

    Premika S.W. Boedhoe;Lianne Schmaal;Yoshinari Abe;Stephanie H. Ameis

  • A functional neuroimaging study of motivation and executive function.

    Stephan F. Taylor;Robert C. Welsh;Tor D. Wager;K. Luan Phan

  • Cortical Abnormalities Associated With Pediatric and Adult Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings From the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group

    Premika S.W. Boedhoe;Lianne Schmaal;Yoshinari Abe;Pino Alonso

  • Resting-State Functional Connectivity between Fronto-Parietal and Default Mode Networks in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Emily R. Stern;Kate D. Fitzgerald;Robert C. Welsh;James L. Abelson

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups

    Premika S W Boedhoe;Daan van Rooij;Martine Hoogman;Jos W R Twisk

  • Medial Frontal Cortex Activity and Loss-Related Responses to Errors

    Stephan F. Taylor;Brian Martis;Brian Martis;Kate D. Fitzgerald;Robert C. Welsh

  • Developmental alterations of frontal-striatal-thalamic connectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Kate Dimond Fitzgerald;Robert C. Welsh;Emily R. Stern;Mike Angstadt

  • Error Processing and Inhibitory Control in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-analysis Using Statistical Parametric Maps.

    Luke J. Norman;Stephan F. Taylor;Yanni Liu;Joaquim Radua

  • Altered Function and Connectivity of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Kate Dimond Fitzgerald;Emily R. Stern;Mike Angstadt;Karen C. Nicholson-Muth

  • INCREASED ERROR‐RELATED BRAIN ACTIVITY IN YOUTH WITH OBSESSIVE‐COMPULSIVE DISORDER AND UNAFFECTED SIBLINGS

    Melisa Carrasco;Shannon M. Harbin;Jenna K. Nienhuis;Kate D. Fitzgerald

  • Proton spectroscopic imaging of the thalamus in treatment-naive pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Kate Dimond Fitzgerald;Gregory J Moore;Lori Anne Paulson;Carol M Stewart

  • Age-related changes in amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotional face processing from childhood into young adulthood.

    Minjie Wu;Autumn Kujawa;Autumn Kujawa;Lisa H. Lu;Lisa H. Lu;Daniel A. Fitzgerald

  • Hyperactive Error Responses and Altered Connectivity in Ventromedial and Frontoinsular Cortices in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Emily R. Stern;Robert C. Welsh;Kate D. Fitzgerald;William J. Gehring

  • Enhanced Neural Reactivity to Threatening Faces in Anxious Youth: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.

    Autumn Kujawa;Autumn Kujawa;Annmarie MacNamara;Kate D. Fitzgerald;Christopher S. Monk

  • Subjective uncertainty and limbic hyperactivation in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Emily R. Stern;Robert C. Welsh;Richard Gonzalez;Kate D. Fitzgerald

  • Giving Voice to Vulnerable Children: Machine Learning Analysis of Speech Detects Anxiety and Depression in Early Childhood

    Ellen W. McGinnis;Steven P. Anderau;Jessica Hruschak;Reed D. Gurchiek

  • Risperidone augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment of pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder.

    Kate Dimond Fitzgerald;Carol M. Stewart;Viviane Tawile;David R. Rosenberg

  • Mapping Cortical and Subcortical Asymmetry in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings From the ENIGMA Consortium

    Xiang-Zhen Kong;Premika S W Boedhoe;Yoshinari Abe;Pino Alonso

  • Error-Related Negativity and Tic History in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Gregory L. Hanna;Melisa Carrasco;Shannon M. Harbin;Jenna K. Nienhuis

Frequent Co-Authors

K. Luan Phan
K. Luan Phan The Ohio State University
Stephan F. Taylor
Stephan F. Taylor University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher S. Monk
Christopher S. Monk University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gregory L. Hanna
Gregory L. Hanna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Autumn Kujawa
Autumn Kujawa Vanderbilt University
Robert C. Welsh
Robert C. Welsh University of Utah
Carles Soriano-Mas
Carles Soriano-Mas University of Barcelona
Jun Soo Kwon
Jun Soo Kwon Seoul National University
Rachel Marsh
Rachel Marsh Columbia University
Maria Muzik
Maria Muzik University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in neuroscience grows, so do the opportunities for flexible online education. Many students explore short certificate programs that pay well to quickly gain specialized skills and enter the workforce. These programs can provide a fast and cost-effective route to careers in healthcare and research, often serving as stepping stones to advanced degrees or licensure.

For those seeking a broader foundation, choosing the easiest online bachelor's degree may be ideal. These programs typically emphasize accessibility and support, making them suitable for those balancing study with other commitments. Their flexibility can also help students pivot into neuroscience-related fields or graduate study.

Cost is a critical consideration for many students. If your interests extend to mental health or social services, the cheapest online msw programs offer affordable pathways to impactful, in-demand careers. For those focused on behavioral analysis, consider exploring the bcba programs online to gain specialized credentials. These online options make career advancement more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Kate D. Fitzgerald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles