World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10074 9452 357 341 767 32871

Iris Zalaudek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iris Zalaudek between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iris Zalaudek published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 31.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 84 publications in 2020. 66 of the 844 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 84. Peak 84 publications in 2020. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 62 publications 2014: 51 publications 2015: 40 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 51 publications 2020: 84 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 43 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 40 publications 2025: 26 publications
1999 2025

844 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iris Zalaudek: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 0
2001 1
2002 3
2003 9
2004 22
2005 18
2006 34
2007 28
2008 24
2009 27
2010 23
2011 24
2012 46
2013 62
2014 51
2015 40
2016 35
2017 36
2018 22
2019 51
2020 84
2021 56
2022 43
2023 37
2024 40
2025 26
Total 844
Download as CSV

Iris Zalaudek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris Zalaudek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 767 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 767
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Iris Zalaudek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris Zalaudek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Iris Zalaudek is a researcher affiliated with the University of Trieste in Italy, specializing in the field of Medicine with a significant focus on Dermatology. Their publication record includes 578 works primarily centered on skin-related medical studies.

Their main subfields of study include:

  • Dermatology
  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Zalaudek's research covers a variety of topics concerning skin diseases and treatments. The main topics they have worked on include:

  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Cancer and Skin Lesions
  • Skin Protection and Aging
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Nail Diseases and Treatments

Some of their recent publications are as follows:

  • Human-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition (2020), published in Nature Medicine
  • European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 2. Treatment (2020), published in European Journal of Cancer
  • European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022 (2022), published in European Journal of Cancer
  • European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2022 (2022), published in European Journal of Cancer
  • European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 1. epidemiology, diagnostics and prevention (2020), published in European Journal of Cancer

Throughout their career, Zalaudek has frequently collaborated with several other researchers, including:

  • Claudio Conforti
  • Nicola di Meo
  • Giuseppe Argenziano
  • Roberta Giuffrida
  • Aimilios Lallas

Their work appears often in specialized dermatology and oncology journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • Dermatologic Therapy
  • Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
  • Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology
  • European Journal of Cancer

Best Publications

  • Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists.

    H.A. Haenssle;C. Fink;R. Schneiderbauer;F. Toberer

  • Human–computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition

    Philipp Tschandl;Christoph Rinner;Zoe Apalla;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • How to diagnose nonpigmented skin tumors: a review of vascular structures seen with dermoscopy: part II. Nonmelanocytic skin tumors.

    Iris Zalaudek;Jürgen Kreusch;Jason Giacomel;Gerardo Ferrara

  • Diagnosis and treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline

    Alexander Stratigos;Claus Garbe;Celeste Lebbe;Josep Malvehy

  • Vascular structures in skin tumors: a dermoscopy study.

    Giuseppe Argenziano;Iris Zalaudek;Rosamaria Corona;Francesco Sera

  • Dermatoscopy of basal cell carcinoma: Morphologic variability of global and local features and accuracy of diagnosis

    Davide Altamura;Scott W. Menzies;Giuseppe Argenziano;Iris Zalaudek

  • Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study.

    Philipp Tschandl;Noel Codella;Bengü Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Accuracy of dermoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of psoriasis, dermatitis, lichen planus and pityriasis rosea.

    A. Lallas;A. Kyrgidis;T.G. Tzellos;Z. Apalla

  • Dermoscopy Improves Accuracy of Primary Care Physicians to Triage Lesions Suggestive of Skin Cancer

    Giuseppe Argenziano;Susana Puig;Iris Zalaudek;Francesco Sera

  • Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma

    Menzies Sw;Kreusch J;Byth K;Pizzichetta Ma

  • Dermoscopy in general dermatology.

    Iris Zalaudek;Giuseppe Argenziano;Alessandro Di Stefani;Gerardo Ferrara

  • Dermatoscopy of facial actinic keratosis, intraepidermal carcinoma, and invasive squamous cell carcinoma: A progression model

    Iris Zalaudek;Jason Giacomel;Karin Schmid;Silvia Bondino

  • Entodermoscopy: a new tool for diagnosing skin infections and infestations.

    Iris Zalaudek;Jason Giacomel;Horacio Cabo;Alessandro Di Stefani

  • Dermoscopy of Bowen's disease.

    I. Zalaudek;G. Argenziano;B. Leinweber;L. Citarella

  • Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy.

    Harald Kittler;Ashfaq A. Marghoob;Giuseppe Argenziano;Cristina Carrera

  • Three-point checklist of dermoscopy. A new screening method for early detection of melanoma.

    H. Peter Soyer;Giuseppe Argenziano;Iris Zalaudek;Rosamaria Corona

  • Expert-Level Diagnosis of Nonpigmented Skin Cancer by Combined Convolutional Neural Networks.

    Philipp Tschandl;Philipp Tschandl;Cliff Rosendahl;Cliff Rosendahl;Bengu Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Accuracy in melanoma detection: A 10-year multicenter survey

    Giuseppe Argenziano;Lorenzo Cerroni;Iris Zalaudek;Stefania Staibano

  • Dermoscopy of squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma.

    Cliff Rosendahl;Alan Cameron;Giuseppe Argenziano;Iris Zalaudek

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Argenziano
Giuseppe Argenziano University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Giovanni Pellacani
Giovanni Pellacani Sapienza University of Rome
H. Peter Soyer
H. Peter Soyer University of Queensland
Susana Puig
Susana Puig University of Barcelona
Ashfaq A. Marghoob
Ashfaq A. Marghoob Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Josep Malvehy
Josep Malvehy University of Barcelona
Lorenzo Cerroni
Lorenzo Cerroni Medical University of Graz
Claus Garbe
Claus Garbe University of Tübingen
Lars E. French
Lars E. French Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Allan C. Halpern
Allan C. Halpern Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine doesn’t always start with medical school. Many students explore related healthcare paths—often through flexible online degrees. For those interested in nursing, affordability is a vital consideration. Before enrolling, students often compare how much is online nursing school to make an informed decision about tuition and fees.

Many working nurses seek advancement by earning their bachelor’s degree. The popularity of rn to bsn online programs shows how professionals can enhance skills and job prospects without leaving their jobs. There are even options for those who aren’t currently nurses, such as direct entry msn online programs, which help bachelor’s degree holders quickly enter the nursing field.

For those interested in academia, research, or advanced clinical roles, doctorate in nursing education online programs offer a pathway to top-tier positions and leadership roles. Across these options, online degrees provide flexibility, accessibility, and a range of career opportunities in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Iris Zalaudek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles