World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
32871
World Ranking
10074
National Ranking
357

Iris Zalaudek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris Zalaudek sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 767 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Iris Zalaudek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris Zalaudek sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Iris Zalaudek is a researcher affiliated with the University of Trieste in Italy, specializing in the field of Medicine with a significant focus on Dermatology. Their publication record includes 578 works primarily centered on skin-related medical studies.

Their main subfields of study include:

  • Dermatology
  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Zalaudek's research covers a variety of topics concerning skin diseases and treatments. The main topics they have worked on include:

  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Cancer and Skin Lesions
  • Skin Protection and Aging
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Nail Diseases and Treatments

Some of their recent publications are as follows:

  • Human-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition (2020), published in Nature Medicine
  • European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 2. Treatment (2020), published in European Journal of Cancer
  • European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022 (2022), published in European Journal of Cancer
  • European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2022 (2022), published in European Journal of Cancer
  • European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 1. epidemiology, diagnostics and prevention (2020), published in European Journal of Cancer

Throughout their career, Zalaudek has frequently collaborated with several other researchers, including:

  • Claudio Conforti
  • Nicola di Meo
  • Giuseppe Argenziano
  • Roberta Giuffrida
  • Aimilios Lallas

Their work appears often in specialized dermatology and oncology journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • Dermatologic Therapy
  • Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
  • Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology
  • European Journal of Cancer

Best Publications

  • Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists.

    H.A. Haenssle;C. Fink;R. Schneiderbauer;F. Toberer

  • Human–computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition

    Philipp Tschandl;Christoph Rinner;Zoe Apalla;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • How to diagnose nonpigmented skin tumors: a review of vascular structures seen with dermoscopy: part II. Nonmelanocytic skin tumors.

    Iris Zalaudek;Jürgen Kreusch;Jason Giacomel;Gerardo Ferrara

  • Diagnosis and treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline

    Alexander Stratigos;Claus Garbe;Celeste Lebbe;Josep Malvehy

  • Vascular structures in skin tumors: a dermoscopy study.

    Giuseppe Argenziano;Iris Zalaudek;Rosamaria Corona;Francesco Sera

  • Dermatoscopy of basal cell carcinoma: Morphologic variability of global and local features and accuracy of diagnosis

    Davide Altamura;Scott W. Menzies;Giuseppe Argenziano;Iris Zalaudek

  • Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study.

    Philipp Tschandl;Noel Codella;Bengü Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Accuracy of dermoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of psoriasis, dermatitis, lichen planus and pityriasis rosea.

    A. Lallas;A. Kyrgidis;T.G. Tzellos;Z. Apalla

  • Dermoscopy Improves Accuracy of Primary Care Physicians to Triage Lesions Suggestive of Skin Cancer

    Giuseppe Argenziano;Susana Puig;Iris Zalaudek;Francesco Sera

  • Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma

    Menzies Sw;Kreusch J;Byth K;Pizzichetta Ma

  • Dermoscopy in general dermatology.

    Iris Zalaudek;Giuseppe Argenziano;Alessandro Di Stefani;Gerardo Ferrara

  • Dermatoscopy of facial actinic keratosis, intraepidermal carcinoma, and invasive squamous cell carcinoma: A progression model

    Iris Zalaudek;Jason Giacomel;Karin Schmid;Silvia Bondino

  • Entodermoscopy: a new tool for diagnosing skin infections and infestations.

    Iris Zalaudek;Jason Giacomel;Horacio Cabo;Alessandro Di Stefani

  • Dermoscopy of Bowen's disease.

    I. Zalaudek;G. Argenziano;B. Leinweber;L. Citarella

  • Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy.

    Harald Kittler;Ashfaq A. Marghoob;Giuseppe Argenziano;Cristina Carrera

  • Three-point checklist of dermoscopy. A new screening method for early detection of melanoma.

    H. Peter Soyer;Giuseppe Argenziano;Iris Zalaudek;Rosamaria Corona

  • European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin : Part 2. Treatment

    Alexander J Stratigos;Claus Garbe;Clio Dessinioti;Celeste Lebbe

  • Expert-Level Diagnosis of Nonpigmented Skin Cancer by Combined Convolutional Neural Networks.

    Philipp Tschandl;Philipp Tschandl;Cliff Rosendahl;Cliff Rosendahl;Bengu Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Accuracy in melanoma detection: A 10-year multicenter survey

    Giuseppe Argenziano;Lorenzo Cerroni;Iris Zalaudek;Stefania Staibano

  • Dermoscopy of squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma.

    Cliff Rosendahl;Alan Cameron;Giuseppe Argenziano;Iris Zalaudek

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Argenziano
Giuseppe Argenziano University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Giovanni Pellacani
Giovanni Pellacani Sapienza University of Rome
H. Peter Soyer
H. Peter Soyer University of Queensland
Susana Puig
Susana Puig University of Barcelona
Ashfaq A. Marghoob
Ashfaq A. Marghoob Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Josep Malvehy
Josep Malvehy University of Barcelona
Lorenzo Cerroni
Lorenzo Cerroni Medical University of Graz
Claus Garbe
Claus Garbe University of Tübingen
Lars E. French
Lars E. French Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Allan C. Halpern
Allan C. Halpern Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine doesn’t always start with medical school. Many students explore related healthcare paths—often through flexible online degrees. For those interested in nursing, affordability is a vital consideration. Before enrolling, students often compare how much is online nursing school to make an informed decision about tuition and fees.

Many working nurses seek advancement by earning their bachelor’s degree. The popularity of rn to bsn online programs shows how professionals can enhance skills and job prospects without leaving their jobs. There are even options for those who aren’t currently nurses, such as direct entry msn online programs, which help bachelor’s degree holders quickly enter the nursing field.

For those interested in academia, research, or advanced clinical roles, doctorate in nursing education online programs offer a pathway to top-tier positions and leadership roles. Across these options, online degrees provide flexibility, accessibility, and a range of career opportunities in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Iris Zalaudek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles