World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
30838
World Ranking
12643
National Ranking
6467

Allan C. Halpern publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan C. Halpern sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 330 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Allan C. Halpern D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan C. Halpern sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Allan C. Halpern is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine, oncology, dermatology, epidemiology, and artificial intelligence, with significant contributions spanning 144 publications in medicine.

Their work covers key subfields including oncology, dermatology, epidemiology, artificial intelligence, and public health, environmental and occupational health. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the variety of topics addressed, such as cutaneous melanoma detection and management, nonmelanoma skin cancer studies, AI in cancer detection, digital imaging in medicine, cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research, skin protection and aging, and cell image analysis techniques.

Halpern has published in several high-profile venues with repeated contributions to the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (14 publications), Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (9 publications), Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (9 publications), Scientific Data (5 publications), and JAMA Dermatology (5 publications).

Frequent collaborators include Veronica Rotemberg, Nicholas R. Kurtansky, Stephen W. Dusza, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, and Michael A. Marchetti, reflecting a broad network of coauthors with counts ranging from 22 to 37 joint works.

Among Halpern's recent published papers are:

  • "Human-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition," 2020, Nature Medicine
  • "BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wild," 2024, Scientific Data
  • "Checklist for Evaluation of Image-Based Artificial Intelligence Reports in Dermatology," 2021, JAMA Dermatology
  • "Validation of artificial intelligence prediction models for skin cancer diagnosis using dermoscopy images: the 2019 International Skin Imaging Collaboration Grand Challenge," 2022, The Lancet Digital Health
  • "A reinforcement learning model for AI-based decision support in skin cancer," 2023, Nature Medicine

Best Publications

  • Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the 2017 International symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC)

    Noel C. F. Codella;David Gutman;M. Emre Celebi;Brian Helba

  • Model Predicting Survival in Stage I Melanoma Based on Tumor Progression

    Wallace H. Clark;David E. Elder;DuPont Guerry;Leonard E. Braitman

  • Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet

    Giuseppe Argenziano;H.Peter Soyer;Sergio Chimenti;Renato Talamini

  • Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)

    Noel C. F. Codella;Veronica Rotemberg;Philipp Tschandl;M. Emre Celebi

  • Deep learning ensembles for melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images

    N. C. F. Codella;Q.-B. Nguyen;S. Pankanti;D. A. Gutman

  • Human–computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition

    Philipp Tschandl;Christoph Rinner;Zoe Apalla;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Clinically Recognized Dysplastic Nevi: A Central Risk Factor for Cutaneous Melanoma

    Margaret A. Tucker;Allan Halpern;Elizabeth A. Holly;Patricia Hartge

  • Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma

    Christopher K. Bichakjian;Allan C. Halpern;Timothy M. Johnson;Antoinette Foote Hood

  • Cutaneous side-effects in cancer patients treated with the antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody C225.

    K.J. Busam;P. Capodieci;R. Motzer;T. Kiehn

  • Dermatologic side effects associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

    Anna Liza C. Agero;Stephen W. Dusza;Cristiane Benvenuto-Andrade;Klaus J. Busam

  • Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study.

    Philipp Tschandl;Noel Codella;Bengü Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • HER1/EGFR inhibitor-associated rash: future directions for management and investigation outcomes from the HER1/EGFR inhibitor rash management forum

    Román Pérez-Soler;Jean Pierre Delord;Allan Halpern;Karen Kelly

  • A patient-centric dataset of images and metadata for identifying melanomas using clinical context

    Veronica Rotemberg;Nicholas Kurtansky;Brigid Betz-Stablein;Liam Caffery

  • Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images

    Michael A. Marchetti;Noel C.F. Codella;Stephen W. Dusza;David A. Gutman

  • Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Prophylactic Oral Minocycline and Topical Tazarotene for Cetuximab-Associated Acne-Like Eruption

    Alon Scope;Anna Liza C. Agero;Stephen W. Dusza;Patricia L. Myskowski

  • Differences Between Polarized Light Dermoscopy and Immersion Contact Dermoscopy for the Evaluation of Skin Lesions

    Cristiane Benvenuto-Andrade;Stephen W. Dusza;Anna Liza C. Agero;Alon Scope

  • Melanoma, version 2.2016 clinical practice guidelines in oncology

    Daniel G. Coit;John A. Thompson;Alain Algazi;Robert Andtbacka

  • Patterns of detection in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

    Mary S. Brady;Susan A. Oliveria;Paul J. Christos;Marianne Berwick

  • BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wild.

    Marc Combalia;Noel C. F. Codella;Veronica Rotemberg;Brian Helba

  • A Patient-Centric Dataset of Images and Metadata for Identifying Melanomas Using Clinical Context

    Veronica Rotemberg;Nicholas Kurtansky;Brigid Betz-Stablein;Liam Caffery

Frequent Co-Authors

Ashfaq A. Marghoob
Ashfaq A. Marghoob Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Alan C. Geller
Alan C. Geller Harvard University
H. Peter Soyer
H. Peter Soyer University of Queensland
Martin A. Weinstock
Martin A. Weinstock Brown University
Josep Malvehy
Josep Malvehy University of Barcelona
Klaus J. Busam
Klaus J. Busam Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David E. Elder
David E. Elder Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Marianne Berwick
Marianne Berwick University of New Mexico
Daniel G. Coit
Daniel G. Coit Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Susana Puig
Susana Puig University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical degree in the USA opens up diverse career pathways beyond becoming a physician. Many students also consider related online degrees for flexibility, cost savings, and specialization. For those interested in foundational healthcare roles, a cheapest online health science degree can offer an affordable starting point and entry into administrative or allied health professions.

If you’re aiming for leadership or management tracks, a masters in healthcare administration cost is a crucial factor. Affordable options help reduce student debt while preparing you for high-demand roles within hospitals or healthcare organizations.

Do you already have clinical experience? Advancing your credentials with the cheapest dnp programs allows nurses to reach the highest practice levels and qualify for advanced leadership and academic roles. Likewise, a flexible online pharmacist degree is ideal for aspiring pharmacists seeking a convenient, accredited path to licensure.

Online programs can offer significant savings and career advancement, making them attractive alternatives or additions to traditional medical degrees in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Allan C. Halpern

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles