World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
24028
World Ranking
12375
National Ranking
6335

Ashfaq A. Marghoob publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashfaq A. Marghoob sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 488 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ashfaq A. Marghoob D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashfaq A. Marghoob sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ashfaq A. Marghoob is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Oncology, Epidemiology, and Dermatology. Their body of work includes 254 publications across these disciplines, focusing particularly on cutaneous melanoma detection and management, nonmelanoma skin cancer studies, and cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research.

The scientist's research interests span a variety of specialized topics, including:

  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Cancer and Skin Lesions
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • AI in cancer detection

Marghoob has contributed to several journals with notable frequency. The key publication venues where they have extensively published include:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • JAMA Dermatology
  • JAAD Case Reports

Among recent research contributions, the following papers provide insight into their areas of focus:

  • Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling in Cutaneous Melanoma, 2020, JAMA Dermatology
  • Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study), 2023, npj Digital Medicine
  • An Epidemiologic Analysis of Melanoma Overdiagnosis in the United States, 1975-2017, 2021, Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology glossary for melanocytic skin lesions: A systematic review, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • In vivo tumor immune microenvironment phenotypes correlate with inflammation and vasculature to predict immunotherapy response, 2022, Nature Communications

Collaboration plays a significant role in Marghoob's research, working frequently with various co-authors. The most common collaborators include:

  • Cristián Navarrete-Dechent
  • Stephen W. Dusza
  • Michael A. Marchetti
  • Allan C. Halpern
  • Konstantinos Liopyris

Best Publications

  • Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists.

    H.A. Haenssle;C. Fink;R. Schneiderbauer;F. Toberer

  • Ultraviolet A and melanoma: a review.

    Steven Q. Wang;Richard Setlow;Marianne Berwick;David Polsky

  • Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study.

    Philipp Tschandl;Noel Codella;Bengü Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Large congenital melanocytic nevi and the risk for development of malignant melanoma and neurocutaneous melanocytosis.

    Flavia V. Bittencourt;Ashfaq A. Marghoob;Alfred W. Kopf;Karen L. Koenig

  • Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images

    Michael A. Marchetti;Noel C.F. Codella;Stephen W. Dusza;David A. Gutman

  • Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma

    Menzies Sw;Kreusch J;Byth K;Pizzichetta Ma

  • Dermoscopy in general dermatology.

    Iris Zalaudek;Giuseppe Argenziano;Alessandro Di Stefani;Gerardo Ferrara

  • Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevi and the Risk for the Development of Malignant Melanoma: A Prospective Study

    Ashfaq A. Marghoob;Sandra P. Schoenbach;Alfred W. Kopf;Seth J. Orlow

  • The CASH (color, architecture, symmetry, and homogeneity) algorithm for dermoscopy

    J. Scott Henning;Stephen W. Dusza;Steven Q. Wang;Ashfaq A. Marghoob

  • Diagnosis and management of nail pigmentations

    Ralph Peter Braun;Robert Baran;Frederique Anne Le Gal;Stephane Dalle

  • Differences Between Polarized Light Dermoscopy and Immersion Contact Dermoscopy for the Evaluation of Skin Lesions

    Cristiane Benvenuto-Andrade;Stephen W. Dusza;Anna Liza C. Agero;Alon Scope

  • Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy.

    Harald Kittler;Ashfaq A. Marghoob;Giuseppe Argenziano;Cristina Carrera

  • New recommendations for the categorization of cutaneous features of congenital melanocytic nevi.

    Sven Krengel;Alon Scope;Alon Scope;Stephen W. Dusza;Reinhard Vonthein

  • Neurocutaneous melanosis : clinical features of large congenital melanocytic nevi in patients with manifest central nervous system melanosis

    Maria DeDavid;Seth J Orlow;Nathalie Provost;Ashfaq A Marghoob

  • Expert-Level Diagnosis of Nonpigmented Skin Cancer by Combined Convolutional Neural Networks.

    Philipp Tschandl;Philipp Tschandl;Cliff Rosendahl;Cliff Rosendahl;Bengu Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Instruments and new technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of melanoma

    Ashfaq A Marghoob;Lucinda D Swindle;Claudia Z.M Moricz;Fitzgeraldo A Sanchez Negron

  • A study of large congenital melanocytic nevi and associated malignant melanomas: Review of cases in the New York University registry and the world literature

    Maria DeDavid;Seth J. Orlow;Nathalie Provost;Ashfaq A. Marghoob

  • Association of melanoma and neurocutaneous melanocytosis with large congenital melanocytic naevi--results from the NYU-LCMN registry.

    E K Hale;J Stein;L Ben-Porat;K S Panageas

  • Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Criteria for Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Actinic Keratoses

    Ayelet Rishpon;Nancy Kim;Alon Scope;Leeor Porges

  • Reflectance confocal microscopy of skin in vivo: From bench to bedside

    Milind Rajadhyaksha;Ashfaq Marghoob;Anthony Rossi;Allan C. Halpern

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan C. Halpern
Allan C. Halpern Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Iris Zalaudek
Iris Zalaudek University of Trieste
Susana Puig
Susana Puig University of Barcelona
Josep Malvehy
Josep Malvehy University of Barcelona
Klaus J. Busam
Klaus J. Busam Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Giuseppe Argenziano
Giuseppe Argenziano University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Alfred W. Kopf
Alfred W. Kopf New York University
H. Peter Soyer
H. Peter Soyer University of Queensland
Giovanni Pellacani
Giovanni Pellacani Sapienza University of Rome
Martin A. Weinstock
Martin A. Weinstock Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA isn’t just about becoming a doctor—there are many online degrees that open doors to rewarding healthcare careers. With the rise of flexible learning options, students can now pursue specialized medical fields through accredited online programs.

For nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, the cheapest dnp online programs offer a cost-effective pathway to leadership roles and clinical expertise. Pharmacists looking to earn advanced credentials can explore online pharmacist programs designed to fit busy schedules.

Careers outside traditional clinical settings are also in demand. The healthcare industry needs skilled professionals in administration and digital recordkeeping, and enrolling in an online mhi program prepares graduates for managing health information systems. Those seeking entry-level roles can consider online medical billing and coding courses, which offer quick entry into the growing healthcare administration sector.

Each of these programs presents unique advantages, from affordability and flexibility to diverse career pathways, helping students find the best fit for their goals in U.S. healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ashfaq A. Marghoob

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles