World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 90 12374 11638 6334 5856 488 24028

Ashfaq A. Marghoob publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ashfaq A. Marghoob between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ashfaq A. Marghoob published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2012. 35 of the 593 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2012. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 9 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 49 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 15 publications
1993 2025

593 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ashfaq A. Marghoob: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 1
1995 9
1996 4
1997 5
1998 3
1999 1
2000 5
2001 5
2002 7
2003 7
2004 15
2005 18
2006 23
2007 22
2008 26
2009 23
2010 21
2011 21
2012 49
2013 28
2014 13
2015 32
2016 24
2017 22
2018 26
2019 31
2020 33
2021 31
2022 31
2023 20
2024 20
2025 15
Total 593
Download as CSV

Ashfaq A. Marghoob publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashfaq A. Marghoob sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 488 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 488
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ashfaq A. Marghoob D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ashfaq A. Marghoob sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 90
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ashfaq A. Marghoob is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Oncology, Epidemiology, and Dermatology. Their body of work includes 254 publications across these disciplines, focusing particularly on cutaneous melanoma detection and management, nonmelanoma skin cancer studies, and cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research.

The scientist's research interests span a variety of specialized topics, including:

  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Cancer and Skin Lesions
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • AI in cancer detection

Marghoob has contributed to several journals with notable frequency. The key publication venues where they have extensively published include:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • JAMA Dermatology
  • JAAD Case Reports

Among recent research contributions, the following papers provide insight into their areas of focus:

  • Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling in Cutaneous Melanoma, 2020, JAMA Dermatology
  • Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study), 2023, npj Digital Medicine
  • An Epidemiologic Analysis of Melanoma Overdiagnosis in the United States, 1975-2017, 2021, Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology glossary for melanocytic skin lesions: A systematic review, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
  • In vivo tumor immune microenvironment phenotypes correlate with inflammation and vasculature to predict immunotherapy response, 2022, Nature Communications

Collaboration plays a significant role in Marghoob's research, working frequently with various co-authors. The most common collaborators include:

  • Cristián Navarrete-Dechent
  • Stephen W. Dusza
  • Michael A. Marchetti
  • Allan C. Halpern
  • Konstantinos Liopyris

Best Publications

  • Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists.

    H.A. Haenssle;C. Fink;R. Schneiderbauer;F. Toberer

  • Ultraviolet A and melanoma: a review.

    Steven Q. Wang;Richard Setlow;Marianne Berwick;David Polsky

  • Comparison of the accuracy of human readers versus machine-learning algorithms for pigmented skin lesion classification: an open, web-based, international, diagnostic study.

    Philipp Tschandl;Noel Codella;Bengü Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Large congenital melanocytic nevi and the risk for development of malignant melanoma and neurocutaneous melanocytosis.

    Flavia V. Bittencourt;Ashfaq A. Marghoob;Alfred W. Kopf;Karen L. Koenig

  • Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images

    Michael A. Marchetti;Noel C.F. Codella;Stephen W. Dusza;David A. Gutman

  • Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma

    Menzies Sw;Kreusch J;Byth K;Pizzichetta Ma

  • Dermoscopy in general dermatology.

    Iris Zalaudek;Giuseppe Argenziano;Alessandro Di Stefani;Gerardo Ferrara

  • Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevi and the Risk for the Development of Malignant Melanoma: A Prospective Study

    Ashfaq A. Marghoob;Sandra P. Schoenbach;Alfred W. Kopf;Seth J. Orlow

  • The CASH (color, architecture, symmetry, and homogeneity) algorithm for dermoscopy

    J. Scott Henning;Stephen W. Dusza;Steven Q. Wang;Ashfaq A. Marghoob

  • Diagnosis and management of nail pigmentations

    Ralph Peter Braun;Robert Baran;Frederique Anne Le Gal;Stephane Dalle

  • Differences Between Polarized Light Dermoscopy and Immersion Contact Dermoscopy for the Evaluation of Skin Lesions

    Cristiane Benvenuto-Andrade;Stephen W. Dusza;Anna Liza C. Agero;Alon Scope

  • Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy.

    Harald Kittler;Ashfaq A. Marghoob;Giuseppe Argenziano;Cristina Carrera

  • New recommendations for the categorization of cutaneous features of congenital melanocytic nevi.

    Sven Krengel;Alon Scope;Alon Scope;Stephen W. Dusza;Reinhard Vonthein

  • Neurocutaneous melanosis : clinical features of large congenital melanocytic nevi in patients with manifest central nervous system melanosis

    Maria DeDavid;Seth J Orlow;Nathalie Provost;Ashfaq A Marghoob

  • Expert-Level Diagnosis of Nonpigmented Skin Cancer by Combined Convolutional Neural Networks.

    Philipp Tschandl;Philipp Tschandl;Cliff Rosendahl;Cliff Rosendahl;Bengu Nisa Akay;Giuseppe Argenziano

  • Instruments and new technologies for the in vivo diagnosis of melanoma

    Ashfaq A Marghoob;Lucinda D Swindle;Claudia Z.M Moricz;Fitzgeraldo A Sanchez Negron

  • A study of large congenital melanocytic nevi and associated malignant melanomas: Review of cases in the New York University registry and the world literature

    Maria DeDavid;Seth J. Orlow;Nathalie Provost;Ashfaq A. Marghoob

  • Association of melanoma and neurocutaneous melanocytosis with large congenital melanocytic naevi--results from the NYU-LCMN registry.

    E K Hale;J Stein;L Ben-Porat;K S Panageas

  • Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Criteria for Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Actinic Keratoses

    Ayelet Rishpon;Nancy Kim;Alon Scope;Leeor Porges

  • Reflectance confocal microscopy of skin in vivo: From bench to bedside

    Milind Rajadhyaksha;Ashfaq Marghoob;Anthony Rossi;Allan C. Halpern

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan C. Halpern
Allan C. Halpern Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Iris Zalaudek
Iris Zalaudek University of Trieste
Susana Puig
Susana Puig University of Barcelona
Josep Malvehy
Josep Malvehy University of Barcelona
Klaus J. Busam
Klaus J. Busam Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Giuseppe Argenziano
Giuseppe Argenziano University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Alfred W. Kopf
Alfred W. Kopf New York University
H. Peter Soyer
H. Peter Soyer University of Queensland
Giovanni Pellacani
Giovanni Pellacani Sapienza University of Rome
Martin A. Weinstock
Martin A. Weinstock Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA isn’t just about becoming a doctor—there are many online degrees that open doors to rewarding healthcare careers. With the rise of flexible learning options, students can now pursue specialized medical fields through accredited online programs.

For nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, the cheapest dnp online programs offer a cost-effective pathway to leadership roles and clinical expertise. Pharmacists looking to earn advanced credentials can explore online pharmacist programs designed to fit busy schedules.

Careers outside traditional clinical settings are also in demand. The healthcare industry needs skilled professionals in administration and digital recordkeeping, and enrolling in an online mhi program prepares graduates for managing health information systems. Those seeking entry-level roles can consider online medical billing and coding courses, which offer quick entry into the growing healthcare administration sector.

Each of these programs presents unique advantages, from affordability and flexibility to diverse career pathways, helping students find the best fit for their goals in U.S. healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Ashfaq A. Marghoob

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles