World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul van den Broek

Paul van den Broek

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 66 2673 2448 140 134 157 20100

Paul van den Broek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul van den Broek between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul van den Broek published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2017. 4 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2017. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1985 2025

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul van den Broek: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 3
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 4
1994 1
1995 4
1996 2
1997 5
1998 0
1999 10
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 8
2006 1
2007 8
2008 8
2009 4
2010 1
2011 6
2012 6
2013 4
2014 7
2015 8
2016 6
2017 14
2018 9
2019 10
2020 5
2021 3
2022 3
2023 1
2024 3
2025 1
Total 168
Download as CSV

Paul van den Broek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul van den Broek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 157 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 157
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul van den Broek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul van den Broek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 66
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul van den Broek is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Additional interests include education and artificial intelligence.

Their work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • School Choice and Performance

Recent publications by Paul van den Broek include:

  • "Do Teachers Treat Their Students Differently? An Observational Study on Teacher-Student Interactions as a Function of Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement" (2020) published in Education Research International
  • "What you read versus what you know: Neural correlates of accessing context information and background knowledge in constructing a mental representation during reading." (2020) published in Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Differentiating Text-Based and Knowledge-Based Validation Processes during Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements" (2020) published in Discourse Processes
  • "Minding the load or loading the mind: The effect of manipulating working memory on coherence monitoring" (2021) published in Journal of Memory and Language
  • "The differential effect of perspective-taking ability on profiles of cooperative behaviours and learning outcomes" (2020) published in Frontline Learning Research

Frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated include:

  • Marianne L. van Moort
  • Arnout Koornneef
  • Dietsje Jolles
  • Amy de Bruïne
  • Nadira Saab

Their publications have appeared frequently in the following venues:

  • Discourse Processes
  • Education Research International
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Frontline Learning Research

Best Publications

  • Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events

    Tom Trabasso;Paul van den Broek

  • Predicting Reading Comprehension in Early Elementary School: The Independent Contributions of Oral Language and Decoding Skills

    Panayiota A Kendeou;Paul van den Broek;Mary Jane White;Julie S. Lynch

  • Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency.

    Joseph R. Jenkins;Lynn S. Fuchs;Paul van den Broek;Christine Espin

  • Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories

    Tom Trabasso;Paul van den Broek;So Young Suh

  • The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts.

    Panayiota Kendeou;Paul van den Broek

  • The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts.

    Paul van den Broek;Robert F. Lorch;Tracy Linderholm;Mary Gustafson

  • Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence.

    Paul van den Broek

  • A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties

    Panayiota A Kendeou;Paul Van Den Broek;Anne Helder;Josefine Karlsson

  • Higher-Order Comprehension Processes in Struggling Readers: A Perspective for Research and Intervention

    David N. Rapp;Paul Van Den Broek;Kristen L McMaster;Panayiota A Kendeou

  • Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension

    Paul Van Den Broek;David N. Rapp;Panayiota A Kendeou

  • Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation

    Paul van den Broek;Paul van den Broek

  • The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension.

    Paul van den Broek

  • The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text.

    Tracy Linderholm;Paul van den Broek

  • Simple but complex: components of the simple view of reading across grade levels

    Janet Tilstra;Kristen McMaster;Paul Van Den Broek;Panayiota Kendeou

  • Children's inference generation across different media

    Panayiota Kendeou;Catherine Bohn-Gettler;Mary Jane White;Paul Van Den Broek

  • A "landscape" view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation.

    Paul van den Broek;Kirsten Risden;Charles R. Fletcher;Richard Thurlow

  • The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading.

    Paul van den Broek;Kirsten Risden;Elizabeth Husebye-Hartmann

  • Cognitive Processes in Comprehension of Science Texts : The Role of Co-Activation in Confronting Misconceptions

    Paul van den Broek;Panayiota Kendeou

  • The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading.

    Darcia Narvaez;Paul van den Broek;Angela Barrón Ruiz

  • Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance

    Bart Huisman;Nadira Saab;Jan van Driel;Paul van den Broek

  • The Effects of Readers' Misconceptions on Comprehension of Scientific Text

    Panayiota A Kendeou;Paul Van Den Broek

Frequent Co-Authors

Panayiota Kendeou
Panayiota Kendeou University of Minnesota
David N. Rapp
David N. Rapp Northwestern University
Christine A. Espin
Christine A. Espin Leiden University
Kristen L. McMaster
Kristen L. McMaster University of Minnesota
Susan R. Goldman
Susan R. Goldman University of Illinois at Chicago
Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch
Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch University of Kentucky
Robert F. Lorch
Robert F. Lorch University of Kentucky
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
Richard Milich
Richard Milich University of Kentucky
Tom Trabasso
Tom Trabasso University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA has become increasingly accessible, with many universities offering flexible online options. fastest online psychology bachelor's programs in Florida allow students to complete their degree more quickly and balance studies with personal commitments.

If geography is a factor, there are also region-specific choices like accelerated online psychology bachelor's programs in Houston and fastest online psychology programs in Colorado. These programs cater to local job markets and offer networking opportunities while providing the flexibility of online learning.

For those seeking advanced credentials, accelerated online psychology doctorate programs in USA are available. Earning a doctorate online can open the door to specialized roles such as clinical psychologist, researcher, or academic faculty, and may accelerate your pathway to licensure.

Whether you are beginning your academic journey or aiming for a doctorate, these diverse online options can fast-track your psychology career while providing quality education tailored to your lifestyle and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Paul van den Broek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles