World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 75 1813 1065 201 17051

Richard Milich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Milich between 1975 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Milich published across 46 years, from 1975 to 2020, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1986. 5 of the 204 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1986. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications
1975 2020

204 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Milich: publications per year, 1975 to 2020
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 3
1980 4
1981 2
1982 4
1983 0
1984 6
1985 3
1986 9
1987 5
1988 3
1989 3
1990 5
1991 6
1992 6
1993 7
1994 5
1995 1
1996 6
1997 2
1998 4
1999 8
2000 5
2001 5
2002 5
2003 5
2004 7
2005 5
2006 5
2007 5
2008 4
2009 8
2010 6
2011 9
2012 5
2013 4
2014 2
2015 5
2016 6
2017 6
2018 7
2019 1
2020 4
Total 204
Download as CSV

Richard Milich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Milich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 201 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 201
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Milich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Milich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 75
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard Milich was affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research primarily focused on psychology, with particular attention to applied psychology, epidemiology, and clinical psychology.

Milich's work covered several topics within behavioral health and interventions, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, and gambling behavior and treatments. These themes were reflected in their scholarly output and collaboration network.

Their recent publications included:

  • The effect of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol outcomes in college students: a 3-year longitudinal analysis (2020) published in the Journal of American College Health
  • Physiological response to reward and extinction predicts alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use two years later (2020) published by UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors in Milich's research projects included Sycarah Fisher, Wei-Wen Hsu, Zachary W. Adams, Chelsea Arsenault, and Karen J. Derefinko. The collaborations spanned multiple studies capturing various dimensions of behavioral and substance-related outcomes.

Milich's publications were frequently found in the Journal of American College Health and UNC Libraries, indicating an emphasis on both peer-reviewed journal articles and academic library repositories.

Best Publications

  • ADHD Combined Type and ADHD Predominantly Inattentive Type Are Distinct and Unrelated Disorders

    Richard Milich;Amy C. Balentine;Donald R. Lynam

  • Hyperactivity, inattention, and aggression in clinical practice

    Richard Milich;Jan Loney

  • Early adolescent through young adult alcohol and marijuana use trajectories: early predictors, young adult outcomes, and predictive utility.

    Kate Flory;Donald Lynam;Richard Milich;Carl Leukefeld

  • Social information processing in child psychiatric populations

    Richard Milich;Kenneth A. Dodge

  • A Friend in Need The Role of Friendship Quality as a Protective Factor in Peer Victimization and Bullying

    Julie M. Bollmer;Richard Milich;Monica J. Harris;Melissa A. Maras

  • Project DARE: No Effects at 10-Year Follow-Up

    Donald R. Lynam;Richard Milich;Rick Zimmerman;Scott P. Novak

  • The self-perceptions and attributions of attention deficit hyperactivity disordered and nonreferred boys

    Betsy Hoza;William E. Pelham;Richard Milich;David Pillow

  • Normative Data on the IOWA Conners Teacher Rating Scale

    William E. Pelham;Richard Milich;Debra A. Murphy;H. Allen Murphy

  • Drinking motives as mediators of the impulsivity-substance use relation: pathways for negative urgency, lack of premeditation, and sensation seeking.

    Zachary W. Adams;Alison J. Kaiser;Donald R. Lynam;Richard J. Charnigo

  • Reactions to bullying and peer victimization: Narratives, physiological arousal, and personality ☆

    Julie M. Bollmer;Monica J. Harris;Richard Milich

  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disordered and control boys' responses to social success and failure.

    Betsy Hoza;Daniel A. Waschbusch;William E. Pelham;Brooke S. G. Molina

  • Effects of positive feedback on the social interactions of boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a test of the self-protective hypothesis.

    Mary Beth Diener;Richard Milich

  • Single and combined effects of methylphenidate and behavior therapy on the classroom performance of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

    Caryn L. Carlson;William E. Pelham Jr.;Richard Milich;Joanne Dixon

  • Stimulant Medication Use by Primary Care Physicians in the Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

    Mark L. Wolraich;Scott Lindgren;Ann Stromquist;Richard Milich

  • The relations among personality, symptoms of alcohol and marijuana abuse, and symptoms of comorbid psychopathology: results from a community sample.

    Kate Flory;Donald R. Lynam;Richard Milich;Carl G. Leukefeld

  • SUSTAINED-RELEASE AND STANDARD METHYLPHENIDATE EFFECTS ON COGNITIVE AND SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR IN CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT DISORDER

    William E. Pelham;James Sturges;JoAnn Hoza;Casey Schmidt

  • Independent dimensions of hyperactivity and aggression: A validation with playroom observation data

    Richard Milich;Jan Loney;Steven Landau

  • Teacher ratings of DSM-III—R symptoms for the disruptive behavior disorders: Prevalence, factor analyses, and conditional probabilities in a special education sample.

    William E. Pelham;Steven W. Evans;Elizabeth M. Gnagy;Karen E. Greenslade

  • Relation between childhood disruptive behavior disorders and substance use and dependence symptoms in young adulthood: individuals with symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder are uniquely at risk.

    Kate Flory;Richard Milich;Donald R. Lynam;Carl Leukefeld

  • Social communication patterns of attention-deficit-disordered boys.

    Steven Landau;Richard Milich

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch
Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch University of Kentucky
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Mark T. Fillmore
Mark T. Fillmore University of Kentucky
William E. Pelham
William E. Pelham Florida International University
Jan Loney
Jan Loney University of Iowa
Carl G. Leukefeld
Carl G. Leukefeld University of Kentucky
Richard R. Clayton
Richard R. Clayton University of Kentucky
C. Nathan DeWall
C. Nathan DeWall University of Kentucky
Paul van den Broek
Paul van den Broek Leiden University
Rick S. Zimmerman
Rick S. Zimmerman Wayne State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities, particularly in the growing field of mental health counseling. Many students opt for online psychology programs, which offer flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to balance education with other commitments. These online degrees are recognized by employers and qualify graduates for licensure exams in most states.

Graduates can choose to pursue roles as counselors, therapists, or behavioral health specialists. To understand the specific steps to enter this profession, you can review resources tailored to different cities, such as how to become a mental health counselor in Laredo, how to become a mental health counselor in Las Vegas, how to become a mental health counselor in Lexington, and become a mental health counselor in Lincoln.

Whether you seek a clinical path or prefer research and teaching, an online psychology degree is a versatile choice. The need for mental health professionals continues to rise, ensuring strong career prospects for those committed to making a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Milich

Recently Published Articles