World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 69 2412 2202 1397 1247 176 12248

Mark T. Fillmore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark T. Fillmore between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark T. Fillmore published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2005. 5 of the 179 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2005. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

179 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark T. Fillmore: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 5
2000 3
2001 5
2002 5
2003 9
2004 6
2005 13
2006 8
2007 6
2008 8
2009 7
2010 11
2011 10
2012 12
2013 7
2014 10
2015 8
2016 6
2017 6
2018 1
2019 3
2020 3
2021 2
2022 4
2023 2
2024 2
2025 3
Total 179
Download as CSV

Mark T. Fillmore publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark T. Fillmore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 176 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 176
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark T. Fillmore D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark T. Fillmore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 69
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Mark T. Fillmore is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, including medicine, psychology, and neuroscience. The scientist has contributed to multiple subfields such as epidemiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, public health, environmental and occupational health, and clinical psychology.

The main topics of Mark T. Fillmore's work include substance abuse treatment and outcomes, mental health research topics, menstrual health and disorders, stress responses and cortisol, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, alcohol consumption and health effects, as well as mindfulness and compassion interventions.

Frequent coauthors in Fillmore's research collaborations include Michelle M. Martel, Annie K Griffith, Holley Allen, Jessica Weafer, and Michael J. Wesley.

The scientist has published regularly in several journals, with notable venues including:

  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Journal of Personality

Selected recent papers by Mark T. Fillmore include:

  • Conceptualizing the UPPS-P model of impulsive personality through network analysis: Key dimensions and general robustness across young adulthood, 2020, Journal of Personality
  • Acute rewarding and disinhibiting effects of alcohol as indicators of drinking habits, 2020, Psychopharmacology
  • Effect of menstrual cycle on rewarding properties of alcohol cues in women., 2023, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Heightened sensitivity to the disinhibiting effect of alcohol in women during the late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle., 2022, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
  • An Experimental Test of the Relationship between Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Use and Alcohol Consumption, 2021, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research

In 2004, Mark T. Fillmore was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Impaired inhibitory control of behavior in chronic cocaine users

    Mark T Fillmore;Craig R Rush

  • Drug abuse as a problem of impaired control: current approaches and findings.

    Mark T. Fillmore

  • Acute Alcohol Effects on Inhibitory Control and Implicit Cognition: Implications for Loss of Control Over Drinking

    Matt Field;Reinout W. Wiers;Paul Christiansen;Mark T. Fillmore

  • Choice impulsivity: Definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications

    Kristen R. Hamilton;Marci R. Mitchell;Victoria C. Wing;Iris M. Balodis

  • An alcohol model of impaired inhibitory control and its treatment in humans.

    Mark T. Fillmore;M. Vogel-Sprott

  • Response inhibition under alcohol: effects of cognitive and motivational conflict.

    Mark T. Fillmore;M. Vogel-Sprott

  • Clubgoers and their trendy cocktails: implications of mixing caffeine into alcohol on information processing and subjective reports of intoxication

    Cecile A. Marczinski;Mark T. Fillmore

  • Acute disinhibiting effects of alcohol as a factor in risky driving behavior.

    Mark T. Fillmore;Jaime S. Blackburn;Emily L.R. Harrison

  • Effects of energy drinks mixed with alcohol on behavioral control: Risks for college students consuming trendy cocktails

    Cecile A. Marczinski;Mark T. Fillmore;Mark E. Bardgett;Meagan A. Howard

  • Alcohol impairment of behavior in men and women.

    Mark T. Fillmore;Jessica Weafer

  • Understanding alcohol expectancy effects: revisiting the placebo condition.

    Maria Testa;Mark T. Fillmore;Jeanette Norris;Antonia Abbey

  • Individual differences in acute alcohol impairment of inhibitory control predict ad libitum alcohol consumption.

    Jessica Weafer;Mark T. Fillmore

  • Acute effects of cocaine in two models of inhibitory control: implications of non-linear dose effects

    Mark T. Fillmore;Craig R. Rush;Lon Hays

  • Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-Amphetamine and sensation-seeking status

    Thomas H. Kelly;Glenn Robbins;Catherine A. Martin;Mark T. Fillmore

  • The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers

    Melissa A. Miller;Mark T. Fillmore

  • Experimental effect of positive urgency on negative outcomes from risk taking and on increased alcohol consumption.

    Melissa A. Cyders;Tamika C. B. Zapolski;Jessica L. Combs;Regan Fried Settles

  • Effects of energy drinks mixed with alcohol on information processing, motor coordination and subjective reports of intoxication.

    Cecile A. Marczinski;Mark T. Fillmore;Amy L. Henges;Meagan A. Ramsey

  • Acute effects of oral cocaine on inhibitory control of behavior in humans.

    Mark T Fillmore;Craig R Rush;Lon Hays

  • Expected effect of caffeine on motor performance predicts the type of response to placebo.

    M. Fillmore;M. Vogel-Sprott

  • Preresponse cues reduce the impairing effects of alcohol on the execution and suppression of responses.

    Cecile A. Marczinski;Mark T. Fillmore

Frequent Co-Authors

Muriel Vogel-Sprott
Muriel Vogel-Sprott University of Waterloo
Craig R. Rush
Craig R. Rush University of Kentucky
Richard Milich
Richard Milich University of Kentucky
William W. Stoops
William W. Stoops University of Kentucky
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Scott D. Lane
Scott D. Lane The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Warren K. Bickel
Warren K. Bickel Virginia Tech
Charles W. Mathias
Charles W. Mathias The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Suzanne H. Mitchell
Suzanne H. Mitchell Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online opens doors to a variety of flexible education and career options. Many students start with a bachelor’s or master’s degree in psychology, which serves as a strong foundation for advancing into specialized fields like counseling or therapy.

Each state and city may have unique requirements for those wishing to become licensed professionals. For example, those interested in meeting the Irving licensed therapist education requirements will need to complete specific coursework, gain supervised experience, and pass state board exams. Similarly, the Jacksonville licensed therapist requirements highlight the importance of both educational credentials and practical clinical training.

Anyone exploring how to become a therapist in urban areas should review guidelines such as how to become a licensed therapist in Jersey City or understand the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Kansas City. These steps may include pursuing an online graduate degree, accumulating field experience, and passing national exams.

Online psychology degrees not only provide academic flexibility but also prepare graduates for diverse and rewarding career paths in mental health, counseling, and social services.

Best Scientists Citing Mark T. Fillmore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles