World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9516 8898 938 898 140 5512

Paul Christiansen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Christiansen between 1951 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Christiansen published across 76 years, from 1951 to 2026, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2025. 32 of the 218 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2025. 1951: 1 publication 1952: 0 publications 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 31 publications 2026: 1 publication
1951 2026

218 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Christiansen: publications per year, 1951 to 2026
Year Publications
1951 1
1952 0
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 3
2012 11
2013 7
2014 11
2015 8
2016 16
2017 11
2018 19
2019 16
2020 13
2021 19
2022 10
2023 19
2024 15
2025 31
2026 1
Total 218
Download as CSV

Paul Christiansen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Christiansen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Christiansen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Christiansen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Christiansen is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with significant contributions in Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their scholarly work encompasses areas such as Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, and Social Psychology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated extensively with Paul Christiansen include:

  • Charlotte A. Hardman
  • Sergio A. Silverio
  • Victoria Fallon
  • E. Boyland
  • Jason C. G. Halford

Their publications have appeared most often in the following venues:

  • Appetite
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • Substance Use & Misuse
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • BMC Public Health

Paul Christiansen's recent papers include:

  • "It's Just Addictive People That Make Addictive Videos": Children's Understanding of and Attitudes towards Influencer Marketing of Food and Beverages by YouTube Video Bloggers (2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Household Food Insecurity, Diet Quality, and Obesity: An Explanatory Model (2020, Obesity)
  • A validation of the Postpartum Specific Anxiety Scale 12-item research short-form for use during global crises with five translations (2021, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth)
  • Maternal-infant bonding and perceptions of infant temperament: The mediating role of maternal mental health (2021, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • Longitudinal associations with alcohol consumption during the first COVID-19 lockdown: Associations with mood, drinking motives, context of drinking, and mental health (2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence)

The scope of their work integrates public health concerns with psychological and sociological frameworks, emphasizing maternal health, nutrition-related behaviors, and the impact of digital media on health perceptions and behaviors in children and adolescents. Their studies also address food insecurity and its relation to obesity and diet quality, as well as validated tools for measuring anxiety in postpartum populations, particularly in the context of widespread crises.

Best Publications

  • Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents.

    Matt Field;Paul Christiansen;Jon Cole;Andrew Goudie

  • Social Media Influencer Marketing and Children’s Food Intake: A Randomized Trial

    Anna E. Coates;Charlotte A. Hardman;Jason C.G. Halford;Paul Christiansen

  • Acute Alcohol Effects on Inhibitory Control and Implicit Cognition: Implications for Loss of Control Over Drinking

    Matt Field;Reinout W. Wiers;Paul Christiansen;Mark T. Fillmore

  • Why Tough Tactics Fail and Rapport Gets Results: Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to Generate Useful Information From Terrorists

    Laurence J. Alison;Emily Alison;Geraldine Noone;Stamatis Elntib

  • Inhibitory control training for appetitive behaviour change: A meta-analytic investigation of mechanisms of action and moderators of effectiveness

    Andrew Jones;Lisa C.G. Di Lemma;Eric Robinson;Paul Christiansen

  • Multiple behavioural impulsivity tasks predict prospective alcohol involvement in adolescents.

    Gordon Fernie;Margot Peeters;Matthew J. Gullo;Paul Christiansen

  • Less than meets the eye: reappraising the clinical relevance of attentional bias in addiction.

    Paul Christiansen;Tim M. Schoenmakers;Matt Field

  • The efficacy of rapport-based techniques for minimizing counter-interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of terrorists.

    Laurence Alison;Emily Alison;Geraldine Noone;Stamatis Elntib

  • The development and validation of the Addiction-like Eating Behaviour Scale

    H K Ruddock;P Christiansen;J C G Halford;C A Hardman

  • Components of behavioural impulsivity and automatic cue approach predict unique variance in hazardous drinking.

    Paul Christiansen;Jon C. Cole;Andrew J. Goudie;Matt Field

  • Internal reliability of the alcohol-related visual probe task is increased by utilising personalised stimuli and eye-tracking.

    Paul Christiansen;Rosie Mansfield;Jay Duckworth;Matt Field

  • The effect of influencer marketing of food and a "protective" advertising disclosure on children's food intake.

    Anna Elizabeth Coates;Charlotte Alice Hardman;Jason Christian Grovenor Halford;Paul Christiansen

  • Ego depletion increases ad-lib alcohol consumption: investigating cognitive mediators and moderators.

    Paul Christiansen;Jon C. Cole;Matt Field

  • Food and beverage cues featured in YouTube videos of social media influencers popular with children: An exploratory study

    Anna Elizabeth Coates;Charlotte Alice Hardman;Jason Christian Grovenor Halford;Paul Christiansen

  • From Socioeconomic Disadvantage to Obesity: The Mediating Role of Psychological Distress and Emotional Eating

    Jade Spinosa;Paul Christiansen;Joanne M. Dickson;Valentina Lorenzetti

  • Fluctuating disinhibition: implications for the understanding and treatment of alcohol and other substance use disorders.

    Andrew Jones;Paul Christiansen;Chantal Nederkoorn;Katrijn Houben

  • Commentary on Ataya et al. (2012), 'Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias'

    Matt Field;Paul Christiansen

  • “It’s Just Addictive People That Make Addictive Videos”: Children’s Understanding of and Attitudes towards Influencer Marketing of Food and Beverages by YouTube Video Bloggers

    Anna Elizabeth Coates;Charlotte Alice Hardman;Jason Christian Grovenor Halford;Paul Christiansen

  • Electrophysiological responses to alcohol cues are not associated with Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in social drinkers.

    Jasna Martinovic;Andrew Jones;Paul Christiansen;Abigail K. Rose

  • Household Food Insecurity, Diet Quality, and Obesity: An Explanatory Model

    Gregory S Keenan;Gregory S Keenan;Paul Christiansen;Charlotte A Hardman

  • Whatever you say, say nothing: Individual differences in counter interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of right wing, AQ inspired and paramilitary terrorists

    Laurence Alison;Emily Alison;Geraldine Noone;Stamatis Elntib

  • Alcohol expectancy moderates attentional bias for alcohol cues in light drinkers.

    Matt Field;Lee Hogarth;Daniel Bleasdale;Phoebe Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

Matt Field
Matt Field University of Sheffield
Eric Robinson
Eric Robinson University of Liverpool
Laurence Alison
Laurence Alison University of Liverpool
Emma J. Boyland
Emma J. Boyland University of Liverpool
Jon C. Cole
Jon C. Cole University of Liverpool
Jordi Salas-Salvadó
Jordi Salas-Salvadó Rovira i Virgili University
Lee Hogarth
Lee Hogarth University of Exeter
Mònica Bulló
Mònica Bulló Rovira i Virgili University
Harry Sumnall
Harry Sumnall Liverpool John Moores University
Matthew J. Gullo
Matthew J. Gullo Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career paths. In particular, many students interested in human communication and behavioral sciences pursue roles in speech-language pathology and therapy. These careers require both specialized education and state-specific certification. For instance, you can learn more about Idaho slp certification requirements if you’re considering practicing in that state.

Each state has unique steps for licensure. For students targeting Illinois, understanding how to become a speech language pathologist in Illinois helps clarify necessary education levels, exams, and supervised clinical experience. Likewise, those interested in Indiana should review the Indiana speech pathologist certification requirements to ensure they’re on the right track.

For prospective students and professionals in Iowa, understanding the process for becoming a speech therapist in Iowa is crucial for career planning. With the increasing availability of online psychology and speech-related degrees, pursuing these fields has never been more accessible—or more promising for a future in helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Christiansen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles